What is KVR Audio? | Submit News | Advertise | Developer Account

Options (Affects News & Product results only):

OS:
Format:
Include:
Quick Search KVR

"Quick Search" KVR Audio's Product Database, News Items, Developer Listings, Forum Topics and videos here. For advanced Product Database searching please use the full product search. For the forum you can use the phpBB forum search.

To utilize the power of Google you can use the integrated Google Site Search.

Products 0

Developers 0

News 0

Forum 0

Videos 0

Search  

great kamioooka - some thoughts to make it a legend.

Official support for: g200kg.com

Moderator: g200kg

User avatar
resistent
KVRist
 
178 posts since 14 Apr, 2008, from Berlin

Postby resistent; Wed Dec 19, 2012 4:07 am

I also would love to see a pink/white switch for the noise and / or a simple pair filter. Also a little mix section within the MISC Module to mix LFO for example. Space is there.

Trust your intuition and keep on working.
THX 4 Kamioooka
LOVE*FIGHT*CREATE
-------------------------------------------
excusemyenglish
g200kg
KVRist
 
481 posts since 22 May, 2004, from Yokohama, Japan

Postby g200kg; Wed Dec 19, 2012 9:38 pm

the basic design of Kamioooka is 'everything is represented as cable-connections' (even if is mess in some patches).

I think it had better be implemented as an another product when I adopt the complex control handling like brok mentioned. it needs a lot of internal parameters and may be hard to keep patch compatibility to current version.

BTW I remember the massTURBOtar, DC'09 entry from lpD.
that has parameter switching ability with velocity.
http://www.kvraudio.com/kvr-developer-challenge/2009/#dc09_35
brok landers
KVRAF
 
5953 posts since 25 Sep, 2003, from right here, as you can see ...

Postby brok landers; Fri Dec 21, 2012 1:33 pm

g200kg wrote:the basic design of Kamioooka is 'everything is represented as cable-connections' (even if is mess in some patches).

I think it had better be implemented as an another product when I adopt the complex control handling like brok mentioned. it needs a lot of internal parameters and may be hard to keep patch compatibility to current version.

BTW I remember the massTURBOtar, DC'09 entry from lpD.
that has parameter switching ability with velocity.
http://www.kvraudio.com/kvr-developer-challenge/2009/#dc09_35

well, you're the boss... though i wouldn't really think that the "cable" approach is hurt by my idea... considering real modular synths from back then were not polyphonic, didn't respond to midi/velocity/cc's at all... and, would you agree that there's _no_ modular dino that would allow midi signals patchable? :)
but yeah, again, you're the boss, but it really would be a shame...
reg, the brok
Image
-gear is as good as the innovation behind it-the man-
Previous

Moderator: g200kg

Return to g200kg