Effects on electric pianos
-
RandolphCarter RandolphCarter https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=185449
- KVRist
- 163 posts since 22 Jul, 2008
I'm trying to get a nice electric piano tone, but no matter the effects I use, I am still not satisfied with the results. It seems as if it's either a choice between it sounding too thin and weak, or if I "beef it up", it ends up having too much low or high end and overdriving a bit/not sounding really clean.
What do you guys use on your electric pianos? I usually put Classic Chorus, compression and a low pass filter with the envelope pulled back. But I'd love to hear your suggestions, specially about compression and EQ to get good tones.
If you want I can upload examples of my e-pianos so you can exactly listen to what's wrong with them.
What do you guys use on your electric pianos? I usually put Classic Chorus, compression and a low pass filter with the envelope pulled back. But I'd love to hear your suggestions, specially about compression and EQ to get good tones.
If you want I can upload examples of my e-pianos so you can exactly listen to what's wrong with them.
-
- KVRAF
- 14739 posts since 19 Oct, 2003 from Berlin, Germany
Last time I messed with Epianos (either VSTi or samples), I did not use any compression at all. Just some EQ here and there. Most important was the slight distortion of the piano (some VSTi have this built in) and the chorus. Maybe even additional flanging and rotary effects - but this is just bonus.
good to know would be in what context you want to use the piano:
- solo instrument or in a mix?
- what kind of style (modern or more "vintage")
- which instrument are you using?
I noticed with a lot of releases recently, that they are too overproduced, too spread apart. I really like the tone of GenuineSoundware's Epianos and the old Logic one. I do not touch any samples anymore.
good to know would be in what context you want to use the piano:
- solo instrument or in a mix?
- what kind of style (modern or more "vintage")
- which instrument are you using?
I noticed with a lot of releases recently, that they are too overproduced, too spread apart. I really like the tone of GenuineSoundware's Epianos and the old Logic one. I do not touch any samples anymore.
-
Mister Natural Mister Natural https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=164174
- KVRAF
- 2891 posts since 28 Oct, 2007 from michigan
love the ePianos in Dimension Pro - lots of different flavors of instruments there
Wurli - Rhodes - Yamaha - all have such different tones
I like a touch of chorusing & 'verb, do not need much EQ or comp . . .
Wurli - Rhodes - Yamaha - all have such different tones
I like a touch of chorusing & 'verb, do not need much EQ or comp . . .
expert only on what it feels like to be me
- KVRAF
- 2696 posts since 3 Aug, 2003 from Narnia
- KVRAF
- 43937 posts since 11 Aug, 2008 from clown world
Anyone who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
- KVRAF
- 2083 posts since 28 Feb, 2011
I'd like to hear your samples.
I used to be a tech at Dyno-My-Piano in San Francisco.
My use a sort of George Duke approach. I use NI's Scarbee Mark 1 from Komplete 8, which has a nice Dukey hard-hammer Rhodes (lots of high-end bells) for a very trebly sound. Starting with that, for soft passages delicate phase-shifting or even wah wah (ala Weather Report - I use U-He Runciter for wah) will give you some very cool 70's vintage sounds. Chorus will give you that rich 80's sound but more mud. If you use effects that boost certain freqs, then a late-stage limiter or compressor can help smooth things out.
If you have mud, use a graphical EQ to find the peaks and reduce them (I swear by Izotope Alloy). Alloy also has a splendid multiband compressor.
If you use the Rhodes for low end, you'll reduce mud by attenuating around 200-300 Hz. Otherwise, use the old mixer's trick of rolling off the low end altogether.
I used to be a tech at Dyno-My-Piano in San Francisco.
My use a sort of George Duke approach. I use NI's Scarbee Mark 1 from Komplete 8, which has a nice Dukey hard-hammer Rhodes (lots of high-end bells) for a very trebly sound. Starting with that, for soft passages delicate phase-shifting or even wah wah (ala Weather Report - I use U-He Runciter for wah) will give you some very cool 70's vintage sounds. Chorus will give you that rich 80's sound but more mud. If you use effects that boost certain freqs, then a late-stage limiter or compressor can help smooth things out.
If you have mud, use a graphical EQ to find the peaks and reduce them (I swear by Izotope Alloy). Alloy also has a splendid multiband compressor.
If you use the Rhodes for low end, you'll reduce mud by attenuating around 200-300 Hz. Otherwise, use the old mixer's trick of rolling off the low end altogether.
- KVRian
- 909 posts since 26 Nov, 2005
I would drop the chorus and use a delay with minimal initial settings for time and feedback. Increase the time and feedback gradually until you get the amount of thickening you want. I don't use a chorus because it can muddle the attack transient. I then pass it through an EQ instead of a low pass filter to fine tune the overall sound. Then finally a little compression to give a bit of bite. That usually gives me a good clean sound.RandolphCarter wrote:What do you guys use on your electric pianos? I usually put Classic Chorus, compression and a low pass filter with the envelope pulled back. But I'd love to hear your suggestions, specially about compression and EQ to get good tones.
This space has been unintentionally left blank.
- KVRAF
- 43937 posts since 11 Aug, 2008 from clown world
Not so bad with the sale price and more importantly, it's designed for job. I'm not familiar with any other AIO (all in one) VST that covers this specific task.hibidy wrote:interesting. kinda pricy though
Anyone who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
- KVRAF
- 18371 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
I've found that the electric pianos that come with my SonicCell just sound so sweet they need no further eq or processing. Maybe it's the source, not the effect. I'm not saying you should turn to a hardware ROMpler, but maybe a better virtual electric piano or sample based Rhodes is what you need more than effects.
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
-
- KVRAF
- 42529 posts since 21 Dec, 2005
Even though I think 117 is pretty steep, I'm going to maybe give it a whirl since I already have 60,000 rhodes samples that I never quite seem to get right.Aloysius wrote:Not so bad with the sale price and more importantly, it's designed for job. I'm not familiar with any other AIO (all in one) VST that covers this specific task.hibidy wrote:interesting. kinda pricy though
-
- KVRAF
- 2285 posts since 20 Dec, 2002 from The Benighted States of Trumpistan
SimulAnalog's Univibe or Antti's Phase 90, then maybe a nice mostly clean amp sim (SimulAnalog's Twin is nice), then maybe a nice tape sim, but I'm old school and like a soft wash of funky color. And cheap, so I use free stuff. Err, frugal.
Wait... loot _then_ burn? D'oh!
- KVRAF
- 12615 posts since 7 Dec, 2004
i have a dyno-my-piano mk.1 r1 stage 73. it actually sounds way worse with the dyno pre/eq than just raw.
main problem though is if you're looking for the classic suitcase timbre it's not only in the pre, but also in the piano itself. the 3,4 and 5 are way different than the mk.1.
with dyno-eq: http://soundcloud.com/aciddose/funkymonkey
the dyno eq gives it this hollow timbre because it's just a really steep bass/treble peaking filter pair. the mk.1 can't be made to sound like the mk.3,4,5 no matter what you do. it's simply a different tine/bar/pickup configuration. it's like trying to sample a minimoog and get your samples to replace the synthesizer, it isn't going to happen no matter how many effects you throw at it.
http://soundcloud.com/aciddose/stg
i like the raw output a lot more.
main problem though is if you're looking for the classic suitcase timbre it's not only in the pre, but also in the piano itself. the 3,4 and 5 are way different than the mk.1.
with dyno-eq: http://soundcloud.com/aciddose/funkymonkey
the dyno eq gives it this hollow timbre because it's just a really steep bass/treble peaking filter pair. the mk.1 can't be made to sound like the mk.3,4,5 no matter what you do. it's simply a different tine/bar/pickup configuration. it's like trying to sample a minimoog and get your samples to replace the synthesizer, it isn't going to happen no matter how many effects you throw at it.
http://soundcloud.com/aciddose/stg
i like the raw output a lot more.
Free plug-ins for Windows, MacOS and Linux. Xhip Synthesizer v8.0 and Xhip Effects Bundle v6.7.
The coder's credo: We believe our work is neither clever nor difficult; it is done because we thought it would be easy.
Work less; get more done.
The coder's credo: We believe our work is neither clever nor difficult; it is done because we thought it would be easy.
Work less; get more done.
-
fateamenabletochange fateamenabletochange https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=8029
- KVRAF
- 3062 posts since 13 Jul, 2003 from outer rim
Rhodes Mark I Stage 73 here, into a preamp, with a mix bus out to chorus for widening and a reverb for placement [to take it a little further back], and a direct out to thicken things up through a reverb with a big delay mixed in very low to give it a kind of subtle sustain.
- KVRAF
- 12615 posts since 7 Dec, 2004
do you have the mk1 r1? the hammers are plastic in the r1 and the original had wooden hammers.
actually it's kind of difficult to identify the mk.1's because of the "rhodes" vs. "fender rhodes".
mine is a fender rhodes mk.1 r1, meaning it has the original 1960s stage design only with the upgraded plastic hammers and rubber tips, and lighter bars.
so even the rhodes mk.1 sounds quite different, which you could actually call the r2, and then there were further upgrades which you could call r3, or even r3 and r4.
actually it's kind of difficult to identify the mk.1's because of the "rhodes" vs. "fender rhodes".
mine is a fender rhodes mk.1 r1, meaning it has the original 1960s stage design only with the upgraded plastic hammers and rubber tips, and lighter bars.
so even the rhodes mk.1 sounds quite different, which you could actually call the r2, and then there were further upgrades which you could call r3, or even r3 and r4.
Free plug-ins for Windows, MacOS and Linux. Xhip Synthesizer v8.0 and Xhip Effects Bundle v6.7.
The coder's credo: We believe our work is neither clever nor difficult; it is done because we thought it would be easy.
Work less; get more done.
The coder's credo: We believe our work is neither clever nor difficult; it is done because we thought it would be easy.
Work less; get more done.


