| Author | Topic: [MAJOR] Automation resolution in eXT1.4.1 - A bug or intention? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|||
Hello to everyone!
So, I have faced a problem with automation resolution. To reproduce it: 1. Get MCompressor from MeldaProductions. 2. Create a new blank eXT project. 3. Add just the Sequencer component. 4. Add a new envelope track in the Sequencer, preferably shaped to be a linear fade. 5. Right-click the first MIDI track and select Output -> Add -> MCompressor 6. Click on the first Audio track in the Sequencer and click that small button in the main mixer with "1" on it. 7. Choose Add insert -> MCompressor 8. Select the envelope track in the Sequencer and choose Output -> audio and also Output -> MCompressor. 9. Double-click the envelope track, change CC to 0 and choose High res from the drop-down option. 10. Find MCompressor instance in the main mixer (leftmost side of the screen) 11. Open its interface by clicking that "e" icon next to its name. 12. Choose File -> CC Map, Add and from the drop-down option choose Release parameter. 13. Now do the same for the second instance of MCompressor, that we loaded as an insert to the audio track of the Sequencer. 14. Lower the tempo to 10 BPM or so. 15. Make it so that both plugin instances have their GUIs visible and hit play on the Sequencer's transport. 16. Have you noticed that the Release setting of one of the MCompressor instances is changing smoothly, while the other is changing with obvious 10-20 value steps, just like low MIDI resolution? How can I avoid that and make it smooth in both cases? Cheers! Daniel Last edited by DanielKonopka on Thu Oct 22, 2009 2:04 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 09 Feb 2007 Member: #139572 | ||
|
|||
UPDATE:
It seems like Automation is fully 32bit only when the envelope track destination is a plugin that is - not - loaded as a direct insert of an audio track, I mean, loaded into a MIDI track and then optionally disconnected from it. But then, we all know doing so destroys PDC... oh... Could somebody shed some light on this? This is a very important problem, as the stepping caused by low resolution is very audible, especially when it comes to - slooooooooooow - filter resonance / sweep automation. This, of course, affects every automatable plugin, from Kjaerhus Classics to Izotope Ozone. Even eXT VST loaded inside standalone version is affected. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 09 Feb 2007 Member: #139572 | ||
|
|||
Couldn't anybody replicate the problem,
or is my description so bad? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 09 Feb 2007 Member: #139572 | ||
|
|||
i think your description is enough and well listed.
iirc, jorgen stated that he will never touch ext 1.41 again. so i guess nobody is interested in confirming any bug for 1.41. or at least only a few die-hard-xt1 fans got hope for it. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 01 Nov 2005 Member: #86239 | ||
|
|||
Aarghhh... I hate it when great developers abandon their
gems... I can only see one possible workaround - use eXT2 (to be honest, I'm not very fond of it...) as host, send automation from eXT2 and use eXT1.4.1 as inserts... then it works fine. I wonder how PDC behaves in such configuration, though. I may sound very naive, but I hope Jorgen opens up the 1.4.1 source code one day... I think, in the right hands it would be a bomb, with all the known issues fixed etc. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 09 Feb 2007 Member: #139572 | ||
|
|||
DanielKonopka wrote: I may sound very naive, but I hope Jorgen opens up the 1.4.1 source code one day... I think, in the right hands it would be a bomb, with all the known issues fixed etc. Sadly that will never happen as people wouldn't bother with eXT2. Personally, I'd like to see development of eXT1 continued and would happily pay for an upgrade that fixed some of its bugs |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Sep 2006 Member: #118909 | ||
|
|||
Yeah, I can feel your pain. Meanwhile, I tested the PDC
behaviour in eXT2 -> eXT1.4.1 chain and everything seems to work properly. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 09 Feb 2007 Member: #139572 | ||
|
|||
Hello again,
I'm trying to use eXT VSTi within Reaper, because I need Reaper's great automation. So far, so good, great sync, etc. My last problem is that automation data sent from Reaper as a parameter to eXT (Param mapping) is not received by Audio tracks inside Sequencer component. Let's say that you send automation to eXT->param0 or param1, etc., you can map the CC to Sequencer's Master Out (pan, volume will react as expected) section of the Main mixer. But, tracks added into the Sequencer component are deaf to it. They are dead. You can't automate their pan, vol, etc. The same goes for their inserts... UNLESS, you route at least one Sequencer's MIDI track Output to them. BUT then... 32 bit automation precision is lost and I can't live with it since it's to be used with things like filter sweeps and sidechaining... Arghhh... even Param mapping does not make it right. -Here- is some old thread regarding that Is there any hope for me, or do I have to abandon the idea? Thinking of it makes me depressed... Cheers! Daniel |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 09 Feb 2007 Member: #139572 | ||
|
|||
why are you using xt1 audio tracks instead of reapers? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Jul 2004 Member: #33896 | ||
|
|||
It's only because I'm quite used to eXT workflow, feel.
It feels faster and less bloated. Plus, Reaper tends to rapidly decrease in responsiveness once your project goes past 15-20 tracks. eXT1 is harder to bring down this way... Thus, I'd like to keep reliance on Reaper as low as possible. But I'm considering it as my very last resort... |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 09 Feb 2007 Member: #139572 | ||
|
|||
I think a potentially working workaround is to
abandon Sequencer component altogether and store everything in the modular view. This way, VSTi automation is kept as 32 bit because there is no Sequencer component on the way, so you don't have to load plugins as inserts, you do it just by connecting "cables" and the good news is PDC should also work this way. There are 2 drawbacks to this approach though... First is that you have to abandon Sequencer, so it creates the necessity to use Audio Part components in the modular view, one per your track, just as you would do inside the Sequencer. Now, as you can imagine, it gets very crowdy as the project grows, so I suggest to use Dock pages in a smart way (for example, everything that goes to Vox Audio part gets its own Dock page "Vox", etc.) to organize your workplace as well as possible. Second drawback, is that because you get rid of Sequencer, Freeze goes out the window with it... I'm trying to figure out a workaround for that as well, at the moment. Any hints, tips, suggestions for that? Cheers! Daniel |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 09 Feb 2007 Member: #139572 | ||
|
|||
This could be completely off target, but if you make a sequencer, some midi tracks with ext VSTs as outputs, distribute parts etc. into them, I think you could freeze Greets, Pete |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 29 Jul 2007 Member: #156491 |
![]() |
All times are GMT - 8 Hours | |
|
Printable version |
||
![]() Previous Topic Next Topic |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group














