No demo, refund and even NFR of some orchestral libraries - is that legal?
- KVRian
- 1115 posts since 31 Aug, 2004
Just bought Spitfire Albion One, download and install. In 30 minutes I found that it is not what I expected.
However there is no way to refund even no resale possibility.
Is that legal?
However there is no way to refund even no resale possibility.
Is that legal?
Last edited by poshook on Fri Dec 22, 2017 2:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- KVRAF
- 23004 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
** Disclaimer ** I am not a lawyer.
Is it legal? Yes.
Is it legal? Yes.
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1115 posts since 31 Aug, 2004
However it is strange that you can not try before buy, can not refund and can not resale. It is not WIN - WIN relationshipwagtunes wrote:** Disclaimer ** I am not a lawyer.
Is it legal? Yes.
-
- KVRAF
- 2315 posts since 24 Jun, 2006 from London, England
Yep, this is their EULA I'm afraid:poshook wrote:Is that legal?
12. Refunds. Due to the nature of downloadable products and online services, no refunds are normally available for Products which have already been downloaded. Any refund request will be considered in our sole discretion and our decision will be final. Nothing herein affects your statutory rights.
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1115 posts since 31 Aug, 2004
I tried...but no successegbert101 wrote:Send them an email explaining you didn't get what you expected. Maybe they will be nice as it's holiday season and give you a refund.poshook wrote:Just bought Spitfire Albion One, download and install. In 30 minutes I found that it is not what I expected.
However there is no way to refund even no resale possibility.
Is that legal?
- KVRAF
- 1770 posts since 1 Mar, 2010 from Paris
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1115 posts since 31 Aug, 2004
That is right. But this is definitely not WIN-WIN situation. NFR is about developer decision, there is no "downloadable products nature". THis is not just Spitfire but almost all orchestral library developers. I do not understand the reason why software libraries use different rules than VST plugins. To me it is exactly the same as plugins. THere is no difference between e.g. VST EQ plugin and software library except the data size.mcbpete wrote:Yep, this is their EULA I'm afraid:poshook wrote:Is that legal?
12. Refunds. Due to the nature of downloadable products and online services, no refunds are normally available for Products which have already been downloaded. Any refund request will be considered in our sole discretion and our decision will be final. Nothing herein affects your statutory rights.
-
- KVRian
- 524 posts since 26 Nov, 2009
What did you expected to buy? Didn't you read the manual or watched demo videos?
There is a try sound for selected sample libraries - I've used it in the past, you can demo online the sounds.
https://www.bestservice.com/try-sound.html#
There is no way for developer to know that you deleted the library, that's why there are no refunds.
There is a try sound for selected sample libraries - I've used it in the past, you can demo online the sounds.
https://www.bestservice.com/try-sound.html#
There is no way for developer to know that you deleted the library, that's why there are no refunds.
-
- KVRAF
- 2657 posts since 13 Mar, 2004
The sole fact that something is stated in the EULA doesn't automatically mean it's 'legal' (ie comply to current laws) I'd say.mcbpete wrote:Yep, this is their EULA I'm afraid:poshook wrote:Is that legal?
12. Refunds. Due to the nature of downloadable products and online services, no refunds are normally available for Products which have already been downloaded. Any refund request will be considered in our sole discretion and our decision will be final. Nothing herein affects your statutory rights.
There's this often cited EU court rule about reselling software, has been discussed here on KVR also several times in the past iirc.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120 ... cant.shtml
- KVRAF
- 2110 posts since 5 Oct, 2015 from Swedish / Living in Hong Kong
I believe you are right but it doesn't make any sense. As an example, UVI have sounds for Falcon and UVI Workstation that comes with serial numbers. I don't see why other libraries on the market could not do the sameThere is no way for developer to know that you deleted the library, that's why there are no refunds.
Last edited by ATN69 on Fri Dec 22, 2017 1:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Win 10 -64bit, CPU i7-7700K, 32Gb, Focusrite 2i2, FL-studio 20, Studio One 4, Reason 10
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1115 posts since 31 Aug, 2004
Spitfire has no try-sound.anomandaris1 wrote:What did you expected to buy? Didn't you read the manual or watched demo videos?
There is a try sound for selected sample libraries - I've used it in the past, you can demo online the sounds.
https://www.bestservice.com/try-sound.html#
There is no way for developer to know that you deleted the library, that's why there are no refunds.
There is a serial number with activation so developer can force for deactivation before refund or transfer. Developers of plugins also do not know that I delete the plugin. But that sounds like all customers are potential crooks.
-
- Banned
- 3889 posts since 3 Feb, 2010
I agree that its due to the nature not refundable, but with Kontakt libraries they dont have this kind of nature, because its not like presets where you can download and just keep it. Its a licence wich once rewoked means you cannot use it.mcbpete wrote:Yep, this is their EULA I'm afraid:poshook wrote:Is that legal?
12. Refunds. Due to the nature of downloadable products and online services, no refunds are normally available for Products which have already been downloaded. Any refund request will be considered in our sole discretion and our decision will be final. Nothing herein affects your statutory rights.
-
- KVRAF
- 35677 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
I wonder what is supposed to be a Win - Win situation with a resale. I mean, yeah... both of the customers win, but, the company doesn't win anything. Actually, it loses.
But, the real reason has already been stated, like with sample packs, there's no way to make sure one side didn't uninstall the product. Same with plugins with serial number though, but, those mostly only allow 1 resale. Which, if you take it strictly, is "illegal" too. I think if the customer claims he cares about "business ethics" though, i think he also should take HIS customer ethics serious, otherwise the nice company he bought so much software from could one day be gone forever.
But, the real reason has already been stated, like with sample packs, there's no way to make sure one side didn't uninstall the product. Same with plugins with serial number though, but, those mostly only allow 1 resale. Which, if you take it strictly, is "illegal" too. I think if the customer claims he cares about "business ethics" though, i think he also should take HIS customer ethics serious, otherwise the nice company he bought so much software from could one day be gone forever.
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1115 posts since 31 Aug, 2004
For me the resale is not important issue. It is just a secondary part of the topic. I see what you wrote. But current situation is that some companies sell "promises" without possibility to try to prevent their business from potential harm of malicious customers. It is like buying dress without trying with the impossibility to refund.chk071 wrote:I wonder what is supposed to be a Win - Win situation with a resale. I mean, yeah... both of the customers win, but, the company doesn't win anything. Actually, it loses.
But, the real reason has already been stated, like with sample packs, there's no way to make sure one side didn't uninstall the product. Same with plugins with serial number though, but, those mostly only allow 1 resale. Which, if you take it strictly, is "illegal" too. I think if the customer claims he cares about "business ethics" though, i think he also should take HIS customer ethics serious, otherwise the nice company he bought so much software from could one day be gone forever.
