I believe the v-machine is gonna be a great product after a few debugging issues. imho you have wrong expectations towards this thing.dirkpiano wrote:
He was talking about Truepianos... is THAT "a large CPU load", in V-Machine terms??? Well, that's it for me then. I'm extremely disappointed.
I've been following this thread for weeks, reading about the V-Machine for months, hoping that I was finally able to replace my CX-3 and Promega 3 with a V-machine running VB3, Truepianos and Elektrik Piano simultaneously.
- running big sample-VSTis requires a lot of internal RAM. loads of internal RAM need a large motherboard, this again requires another housing, etc...
- show me a PC below 1000$ that runs VB3, truepiano and NI elekrik with 10x3 voices at the same time...
- its not probable the v-machine runs all major plugs. even if NI elektrik would be compatible now, I am not sure if NI+Co. would block the compability in future releases - unless SMPro has a binding contract with the vst dev.
- u cannot compare a v-machine with a Promega 3 or a CX-3. the GM Promega 3 is about 7 times more expensive - surley it has more power! also the promega is about 10 times heavier... of course, even if you had 7x v-machine you'd hardly get the 320 polyphony of a Promega: the v-machine is all-purpose, it has no specific synthesis architecture.
the big advantage for a v-machine in my eyes is that you can easily add another one to your setup. while going on tour with 3 laptops is not very reasonable, you could get a distinct v-machine for every big plugin u need to run.