AmpliTube Version 3.7.1 Now Available! Optimized: 30% to 40% less CPU & RAM
-
- KVRer
- 6 posts since 6 Apr, 2011
looking forward to it !
-
- KVRian
- 1335 posts since 23 Sep, 2003 from ocation: cation: ation: tion: ion: on: n: :
Ok, after a quick investigation:Peter - IK Multimedia wrote:The sound quality was not comprised at all during optimization. You should contact support. Thanks.Paulie Phonick wrote:Is it me or v3.7.1 doesn't sound the same? I just upgraded from v3.0.2 (I know, been a while) and my projects sound f..d up. Boomy low end on high gain presets; harshness and levels screwed up on others (80s Ballad for instance). If this is a side effect of the optimization, how do I get rid of it, besides downgrading?
1. The upgrade has reset all my quality prefs (oversampling, resolution etc.) to their lowest settings. Bringing them up again has helped.
2. The issue, however, seems to have more to do with recall of presets saved by the old AT 3.0.2. For instance, in one project I have a preset that is basically the 80s Ballad + a compressor. I open the project, it sounds harsh, middy and too loud. If I then select the 80s Ballad from the preset browser, add the Compressor and fiddle with settings, I can get a good sound again, albeit at different settings.
Anybody else gets this as well?
@Peter: I'll try to investigate further and get in touch with support, but I don't have much time for cross analysis of AT3 versions at the moment. Can you please verify that presets/models from the pre Custom Shop AT3 behave the same in v3.7.1?
the the impotence of proofreading
-
- KVRian
- 804 posts since 20 Aug, 2005 from Ann Arbor, MI
For what it's worth, by the way, AT 3.7.1 seems to be working just fine in Band In A Box 2012. 
Tom Smith
http://tomsmith.bandcamp.com - http://www.filkertom.com - http://www.thefump.com
Win10/64 - I5 3570K - 16 GB RAM - BIAB 2016 - Reaper 5 - Sound Forge Pro 9
http://tomsmith.bandcamp.com - http://www.filkertom.com - http://www.thefump.com
Win10/64 - I5 3570K - 16 GB RAM - BIAB 2016 - Reaper 5 - Sound Forge Pro 9
-
- KVRAF
- 5524 posts since 5 May, 2007 from Mars Colony
I think a better workaround would be for an update to reestablish the previous protocol and have AT not report 7 samples latency again.Brian @ IK Multimedia wrote: A work around for this is to disable PDC in Reaper while recording.
"You don’t expect much beyond a gaping, misspelled void when you stare into the cold dark place that is Internet comments."
---Salon on internet trolls attacking Cleveland kidnapping victim Amanda Berry
---Salon on internet trolls attacking Cleveland kidnapping victim Amanda Berry
-
- KVRAF
- 1629 posts since 11 Dec, 2005 from Malmö, Sweden
Nah, I think Dr.Gunjah is correct. I want facts, evidence, especially when it comes from a company like IK Multimedia that are experts in advertising...hibidy wrote:In fact, my singles are the only ones that do report it (not going anywhere near 3.71) with ONE exception, and that is magnetic.Dr.Gunjah wrote:sorry, but this is sheer assumption.Brian @ IK Multimedia wrote: Few developers report their latency accurately. That's actually the reason why you're seeing them all report zero - not because it's not there, but because they're just not reporting their latency at all!
In my experience it's the other way around... most (serious) devs do it right and just a few don't.
-
- KVRist
- 484 posts since 15 Jan, 2009
That's awesome IK this has been long awaited by many! I'm sorry to read about the PDC problems, I'm sure this will all be sorted out soon.
Thanks for the tip on disabling PDC while recording as a temporary fix. Having properly reported delay is better than a lie/omission!
Thanks for the tip on disabling PDC while recording as a temporary fix. Having properly reported delay is better than a lie/omission!
- KVRAF
- 5440 posts since 4 Aug, 2006 from Helsinki
Brian @ IK Multimedia wrote:Save 30% in CPU usage and 35% in RAM usage
Other enhancements to AmpliTube include the addition of the Preset Up and Preset Down menu items in the StealthPedal controller dialogue menu, and overall stability enhancements.
.
So far I haven't learn how to browse the AT presets. Can you do that in
the way what is most logical and convinient for the user: i.e.
after you have chosen the instrument and the genre, these presets
appear to the window. If you activate the first preset in this list and then try to get the next one in the list by clicking the preset arrow in the
top side of the interface - no! - you don't get the next preset in the list.
(99 % of the plugins preset browser work in the way that the up-down arrow brigns the next/previous in the list - in the IK way you have double-click again and again and again and again and again ...)
IK - do I get something wrong or is this very basic feature that difficult to implement. Your way makes the browsing of the presets very confusing.
I don't give a damn about the browsing with the SteatlhPedal, first you should fix this fundamental issue I menion above, then maybe finetune pedal browsing.
Harry
-
- KVRian
- 871 posts since 20 Jun, 2010
I'm incertain about this.A.M. Gold wrote:I think a better workaround would be for an update to reestablish the previous protocol and have AT not report 7 samples latency again.Brian @ IK Multimedia wrote: A work around for this is to disable PDC in Reaper while recording.
now that we have learned that amplitube always had this latency and just didn't report it, the only real solution would be to change the engine so that it does not introduce latency.
Though since we all know this won't happen (
I guess we (Reaper guys) might get the old behaviour by using this (?!)
-
- KVRAF
- 1580 posts since 22 Apr, 2011 from The House of Zaid
So many plugins that introduce latency that never report it. It took Soundtoys forever to add their latency reporting. I think mfr's need to be more upfront about latency in their plugins as this can cause serious mixing issues even if you think you don't hear anything. Slight phase caused by a 7 sample delay might be inaudible but it might also be eating up headroom and then you might wonder why your track isn't sounding as loud and crisp, well you have some phasing going on that you didn't know about.
I wonder if Guitar Rig also adds latency but just doesn't report it. Any way to truly verify this?
I wonder if Guitar Rig also adds latency but just doesn't report it. Any way to truly verify this?
Has anybody ever really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
-
- KVRist
- 431 posts since 3 Oct, 2009
...About Soundtoys... Decapitator is still 1 sample off...@midnight wrote:So many plugins that introduce latency that never report it. It took Soundtoys forever to add their latency reporting. I think mfr's need to be more upfront about latency in their plugins as this can cause serious mixing issues even if you think you don't hear anything. Slight phase caused by a 7 sample delay might be inaudible but it might also be eating up headroom and then you might wonder why your track isn't sounding as loud and crisp, well you have some phasing going on that you didn't know about.
I wonder if Guitar Rig also adds latency but just doesn't report it. Any way to truly verify this?
It is reporting 1 sample delay more than it is actually using
Delay compenstion seems to be quite tricky
-
- KVRAF
- 42529 posts since 21 Dec, 2005
I don't know what all of this is but GR, Schuffam and AT 3.7 report NOTHING in reaper. They work fine@midnight wrote: I wonder if Guitar Rig also adds latency but just doesn't report it. Any way to truly verify this?
If I add an instance of any IK single, I get reporting and I can hear the difference.
- KVRAF
- 2707 posts since 23 Mar, 2005 from Detroit
I don't care about the PDC that much or whatever people are mad about in this thread, because this plugin is now usable without being an extreme resource hog on my dated (6 year old) system.
______________
They said they fixed the Stealth Pedal write automation
A proper (video) tutorial would be great.
I know there is the midi setup on the plugin, and also a separate midi program configuration utility. This is all mind boggling to me, and I can usually figure these things out by reading the manual or online tips/hints from someone.
If someone knows how to do this, please explain.
(Edited to sound nice, the previous wording was to get IK's attention, not to sound harsh, but maybe it did)
Last edited by metalifuxx on Sat Mar 10, 2012 11:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Peter - IK Multimedia Peter - IK Multimedia https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=217907
- KVRAF
- 8146 posts since 20 Oct, 2009
In Reaper... You are hearing it because of the rounding up, not because of a mere 7 samples of properly-reported latency. Have you reached out to Reaper support? All other hosts appear to be handling this minute amount of latency properly reported without a hitch. Obviously we've looked at this and Brian already answered correctly on our part but I'm surprised nobody has stated they've even asked Reaper support/devs about this.hibidy wrote:I don't know what all of this is but GR, Schuffam and AT 3.7 report NOTHING in reaper. They work fine@midnight wrote: I wonder if Guitar Rig also adds latency but just doesn't report it. Any way to truly verify this?
If I add an instance of any IK single, I get reporting and I can hear the difference.
Also, if you are adding Singles during tracking I can understand Reaper's round-up affecting things but in a mix environment with higher buffer settings being typically the norm, wouldn't your host handle reported latency correctly even with the rounding up and everything be perfectly aligned? In Cubase and Studio One it sure does, from experience.
-
- KVRAF
- 42529 posts since 21 Dec, 2005
Why would I reach out to reaper support?
The other plug ins are fine
It's just the IK stuff.
3.7 doesn't report anything, just the IK singles (and apparently the 3.7.1 update)
The other plug ins are fine
3.7 doesn't report anything, just the IK singles (and apparently the 3.7.1 update)
