Pultec Eq's Comparisons
-
- KVRian
- 527 posts since 7 Apr, 2010
Any users thoughts, pros/ cons regarding these Pultec style eq's?
Waves Puig-tec
PSP Noble EQ
IK Vintage Tube
thanks
Waves Puig-tec
PSP Noble EQ
IK Vintage Tube
thanks
-
- KVRAF
- 14739 posts since 19 Oct, 2003 from Berlin, Germany
Different flavours, different kind out outcome.
You also missed:
Nomad Factory Pultec
UAD Pultec
amongst:
Leftover Lasagne Pushtec, G-Sonique Pultronic EQ-110P, URS FullTec
For even more push-pull EQing:
Variety of Sound BootEQmk2 and NastyVCS, even the passive SPL PASSEQ would count to that.
And let us not forget the Tube-Tech "Pultec" design PE-1C.
Again, different flavours...
You also missed:
Nomad Factory Pultec
UAD Pultec
amongst:
Leftover Lasagne Pushtec, G-Sonique Pultronic EQ-110P, URS FullTec
For even more push-pull EQing:
Variety of Sound BootEQmk2 and NastyVCS, even the passive SPL PASSEQ would count to that.
And let us not forget the Tube-Tech "Pultec" design PE-1C.
Again, different flavours...
-
- KVRist
- 62 posts since 6 Mar, 2004 from FWI
Another one: Antress "The black dragon", the curves really match the UAD one but without the mojo, and it's free !
http://antress.blogspot.com/
For what i compared with the demos, it seems that for me, the best sounding high end boosts can be achieved with the PSP, UAD and Tube-Tech, the one that impressed me the less is the IKM one.
But you should try by yourself as equing is a really subjective thing.
http://antress.blogspot.com/
For what i compared with the demos, it seems that for me, the best sounding high end boosts can be achieved with the PSP, UAD and Tube-Tech, the one that impressed me the less is the IKM one.
But you should try by yourself as equing is a really subjective thing.
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 527 posts since 7 Apr, 2010
Thanks, I didn't miss them, just curious about these 3 specifically.Compyfox wrote:Different flavours, different kind out outcome.
You also missed:
Nomad Factory Pultec
UAD Pultec
amongst:
Leftover Lasagne Pushtec, G-Sonique Pultronic EQ-110P, URS FullTec
For even more push-pull EQing:
Variety of Sound BootEQmk2 and NastyVCS, even the passive SPL PASSEQ would count to that.
And let us not forget the Tube-Tech "Pultec" design PE-1C.
Again, different flavours...
- KVRAF
- 3540 posts since 1 Oct, 2006 from Um! Where is this?
My favourite is the PSP Noble not an exact Pultec clone but certainly does the job and then some.I think it's far more flexible than the other two.
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 527 posts since 7 Apr, 2010
Thanks.Resonator63 wrote:My favourite is the PSP Noble not an exact Pultec clone but certainly does the job and then some.I think it's far more flexible than the other two.
Any idea which one resembles the hardware the most?
-
- KVRAF
- 14739 posts since 19 Oct, 2003 from Berlin, Germany
IK Vintage.
Oh wait... you can't really say that. Noble EQ is "inspired" by Pultec design. Puig-Tec, Vintage Tube, Pultec (Nomad)/UAD Pultec - they are all modeled after the particular Pultec hardware module they had at their disposal.
I remember a shootout from way back where people did comparisions with the most common suspects. The Nomad one cut through fairly well in that A/B/C/D thingy, so did the IKM creation. UAD and Waves were surprisingly not that well regarded.
Madbee actually summed it up pretty well:
Oh wait... you can't really say that. Noble EQ is "inspired" by Pultec design. Puig-Tec, Vintage Tube, Pultec (Nomad)/UAD Pultec - they are all modeled after the particular Pultec hardware module they had at their disposal.
I remember a shootout from way back where people did comparisions with the most common suspects. The Nomad one cut through fairly well in that A/B/C/D thingy, so did the IKM creation. UAD and Waves were surprisingly not that well regarded.
Madbee actually summed it up pretty well:
Which one is "closest" is up to you. No hardware module sounds the same. And sometimes I thank the plugin developers to take that into consideration as well. Which is only good for business - a lot of Pultec's to choose from and still sound different on the long run.But you should try by yourself as equing is a really subjective thing.
-
- KVRist
- 162 posts since 28 Jun, 2007
-
- KVRian
- 674 posts since 22 Sep, 2007 from Caracas, Venezuela
I chose IK's over Softube's, UAD's and Waves'. My personal preference, of course.
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 527 posts since 7 Apr, 2010
To all thanks.
I've never used any hardware versions. I'm curious what others think sound wise, the boost + atten together technique in particular- guessing it's a preset in Nebula.
I've never used any hardware versions. I'm curious what others think sound wise, the boost + atten together technique in particular- guessing it's a preset in Nebula.
Last edited by Lenticular on Tue Mar 27, 2012 6:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRian
- 514 posts since 6 Mar, 2012
Like Compyfox said: You missed the Nomad Factory EQ, which I believe differs considerably from the other plug-ins since it includes two hardware units in one VST. That's why it's called "PULSE-TEC EQs".
I have both the IKM Vintage Tube Program Equalizer and the NF PULSE-TEC EQs. Haven't heard any of the others, nor the original hardware. To my ears, the IKM is a solid piece of software allowing vintage and modern modeling of any instruments or vocals, single tracks or busses. The NF, however, goes even beyond that, in that it allows to do more fine tuning and extended signal shaping. The sound it puts out is definitely of a very high quality.
The IKM is about 30 $ cheaper than the NF, in case that's important for your choice.
I have nearly the whole range of NF plug-ins. While some of them are only average, others are good or excellent. But: If I were to give away all of them but one, I would keep the PULSE-TEC EQs. IMO, this tool is NF's masterpiece so far.
I have both the IKM Vintage Tube Program Equalizer and the NF PULSE-TEC EQs. Haven't heard any of the others, nor the original hardware. To my ears, the IKM is a solid piece of software allowing vintage and modern modeling of any instruments or vocals, single tracks or busses. The NF, however, goes even beyond that, in that it allows to do more fine tuning and extended signal shaping. The sound it puts out is definitely of a very high quality.
The IKM is about 30 $ cheaper than the NF, in case that's important for your choice.
I have nearly the whole range of NF plug-ins. While some of them are only average, others are good or excellent. But: If I were to give away all of them but one, I would keep the PULSE-TEC EQs. IMO, this tool is NF's masterpiece so far.
Last edited by Skorpius on Tue Mar 27, 2012 6:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 527 posts since 7 Apr, 2010
Thanks, I'll check that one out too.Skorpius wrote:Like Compyfox said: You missed the Nomad Factory EQ, which I believe differs considerably from the other plug-ins since it includes two hardware units in one VST. That's why it's called "PULSE-TEC EQs".
I have both the IKM Vintage Tube Program Equalizer and the NF PULSE-TEC EQs. Haven't heard any of the others, nor the original hardware. To my ears, the IKM is a solid piece of software allowing vintage and modern modeling of any instruments or vocals, single tracks or busses. The NF, however, goes even beyond that, in that it allows to do more fine tuning and extended signal shaping. The sound it puts out is definitely of a very high quality.
The IKM is about 30 $ cheaper than the NF, in case that's important for your choice.
I have nearly the whole range of NF plug-ins. While some of them are only average, others are good or excellent. But: If I were to give away all of them but one, I would keep the PULSE-TEC EQs. IMO, this tool is NF's masterpiece so far.
-
- KVRAF
- 14739 posts since 19 Oct, 2003 from Berlin, Germany
You can do similar with NastyVCS and to a certain extend, also BootEQmkII. They're heavily inspired upon such equipment.Lenticular wrote:To all thanks.
I've never used any hardware versions. I'm curious what others think sound wise, the boost + atten together technique in particular- guessing it's a preset in Nebula.
Again, use your ears and decide what sounds best to you. Even in default the Pultec "colors" (I put that in quotation marks on purpose) the sound. One VST plugin does more, one less. It's really up to your ears and maybe even testing throughoutly with tools like C.Budde Plugin Analyser.
Out of all of them, I don't have any preference. Each EQ does what it should: filter. I just wish G-Sonique would finally go native and update their Pultronic EQ. I like the fusion of a Pultec like EQ and the ability to chance both the input and output modes. Unfortunately that EQ never got a good manual (or any at all). Still a steal for that money though. And... they have a sale atm as well (buy 2, get one additional free).
-
- KVRist
- 161 posts since 11 Feb, 2011 from Duluth
I agree - how strange it is that in ALL those NF plug's which, admittedly, I never resonated with (especially the compressors or limiters), they managed to do one that sounded so darn nice to me. My impressions echo Skorpius, the NF Pulse-tec is generally THE pultec type EQ I use (never mind if it sounds like a real pultec, I wouldn't know not having ever used the hardware version; the Pulse-tec EQ just sounds wonderful to me, provided the 'clipper' is turned off ~Skorpius wrote:Like Compyfox said: You missed the Nomad Factory EQ, which I believe differs considerably from the other plug-ins since it includes two hardware units in one VST. That's why it's called "PULSE-TEC EQs".
I have both the IKM Vintage Tube Program Equalizer and the NF PULSE-TEC EQs. Haven't heard any of the others, nor the original hardware. To my ears, the IKM is a solid piece of software allowing vintage and modern modeling of any instruments or vocals, single tracks or busses. The NF, however, goes even beyond that, in that it allows to do more fine tuning and extended signal shaping. The sound it puts out is definitely of a very high quality.
The IKM is about 30 $ cheaper than the NF, in case that's important for your choice.
I have nearly the whole range of NF plug-ins. While some of them are only average, others are good or excellent. But: If I were to give away all of them but one, I would keep the PULSE-TEC EQs. IMO, this tool is NF's masterpiece so far.
I love the PSP Noble too but feel it is generally another beast altogether. The UA one is sooo old, dated, I think you can hear it - just sounds one dimensional in comparison to almost all the others - kudos for them for going for it so long ago, but since their pultec hit the streets, even UA themselves have grown, developed & refined their methods in modeling (as heard these days with their Neve, Manley, Studer, Ampex, VOG, etc,). All the others (puig, tube-tech, etc.) you can generally take or leave, but that NF pulse-tec does have something really nice going on...I am still surprised.
- KVRAF
- 3540 posts since 1 Oct, 2006 from Um! Where is this?
Not ever having used the hardware I wouldn't like to say.Lenticular wrote:Thanks.Resonator63 wrote:My favourite is the PSP Noble not an exact Pultec clone but certainly does the job and then some.I think it's far more flexible than the other two.
Any idea which one resembles the hardware the most?
But PSP Noble is very,very good
