Yeah, something like that.sinkmusic wrote: And what about, when you type a custom name, a tick box or something with "remember that name" or "add this name to list" ?
If it is technically possible, that would be great...
MMultiAnalyzer, new multitrack analyzer/sonogram from MeldaProduction
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122 - KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 14325 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
-
- KVRAF
- 1870 posts since 17 May, 2005
Looking great.
Question, when i arrange i (almost) always name my tracks. Could you make it so that this plugin inherits the trackname in the overview?
It would save time from selecting a name manually.
I use Ableton btw.
Bye
Question, when i arrange i (almost) always name my tracks. Could you make it so that this plugin inherits the trackname in the overview?
It would save time from selecting a name manually.
I use Ableton btw.
Bye
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 14325 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
That's impossible I'm afraid, afaik host doesn't provide this information to the plugin.zeep wrote:Looking great.
Question, when i arrange i (almost) always name my tracks. Could you make it so that this plugin inherits the trackname in the overview?
It would save time from selecting a name manually.
I use Ableton btw.
Bye
-
- KVRAF
- 3329 posts since 18 May, 2003 from Sweden
Having just bought MMultiAnalyzer, I can see that I can probably get good use out of it.
However, I think that the workflow could benefit a lot if editing names and colours, etc., could be done for any track from any other instance of the plug in - just selecting the relevant track in the lefthand list and tweak names and other parphernalia of any of the other track instances.
That would be nice…
Best,
Joachim
However, I think that the workflow could benefit a lot if editing names and colours, etc., could be done for any track from any other instance of the plug in - just selecting the relevant track in the lefthand list and tweak names and other parphernalia of any of the other track instances.
That would be nice…
Best,
Joachim
If it were easy, anybody could do it!
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 14325 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
That's parly true, I'll think about it
-
- KVRAF
- 1870 posts since 17 May, 2005
Demoing it right now.
May i +1 this below! That would be very nice.
May i +1 this below! That would be very nice.
Spitfire31 wrote:..I think that the workflow could benefit a lot if editing names and colours, etc., could be done for any track from any other instance of the plug in - just selecting the relevant track in the lefthand list and tweak names and other parphernalia of any of the other track instances.
That would be nice…
Best,
Joachim
-
- KVRian
- 750 posts since 6 May, 2006 from Sweden
I have demoed some multichannel analyzers and this is one of the lightest (CPU) of them. I also like the clear view and the choice of available settings. I finally purchased it but have a request. There is a global disable function button but what do you think about a solo button for each channel?
-
- KVRAF
- 5524 posts since 5 May, 2007 from Mars Colony
+1, that makes a lot of sense. Maybe there is a way to do that that we are missing.KungKrille wrote:I have demoed some multichannel analyzers and this is one of the lightest (CPU) of them. I also like the clear view and the choice of available settings. I finally purchased it but have a request. There is a global disable function button but what do you think about a solo button for each channel?
"You don’t expect much beyond a gaping, misspelled void when you stare into the cold dark place that is Internet comments."
---Salon on internet trolls attacking Cleveland kidnapping victim Amanda Berry
---Salon on internet trolls attacking Cleveland kidnapping victim Amanda Berry
-
- KVRAF
- 1870 posts since 17 May, 2005
I'd like to see more settings for the analyzer with the ability to make it more detailed. Right now the analyzer in mdynamiceq that i use has a more precise display setting, allowing me to focus on small peaks etc.
Is that a possibility?
Is that a possibility?
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 14325 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
Ok folks, solo added to to-do list. Detailed settings - no I'm afraid. The things is the synchronization between the plugins. I'll think about it, but I doubt it right now. I also want to keep thisone simple.
-
- KVRAF
- 5524 posts since 5 May, 2007 from Mars Colony
Here's a thought: what might be really useful on a plug-in like this (and doesn't seem like it would be hard to add because it would just be another kind of display option), would be to be able to have two tracks on the plug-in enabled, and have the option to make one of them only display where it overlaps the first track (I don't know, maybe this is already a feature option I missed). One track could be "main" and the secondary one "overlap".
This would be a more direct way of looking for masking issues without also having to see all the areas where the two curves don't coincide (which would make it easier in a busy mix with a lot of dynamic action in the waveforms, which can be visually distracting).
The user could also choose to color one light and the overlapping track much darker for a high degree of contrast to make the overlap even easier to see.
As an example, I might have the full curve be a bass guitar and the overlap curve be the kick drum. I might make the bass light yellow and the kick black. I would see the full bass track curve, but not the full kick drum---I would only see the area under the bass curve where the kick drum curve is also present, and no other part of the kick drum curve would be visible.
I could very easily spot areas where there was a high degree of coincidence between the two waveforms, and then do EQ cutting to the main track to compensate. I think it would speed up workflow somewhat for that particular kind of task.
Just a thought.
This would be a more direct way of looking for masking issues without also having to see all the areas where the two curves don't coincide (which would make it easier in a busy mix with a lot of dynamic action in the waveforms, which can be visually distracting).
The user could also choose to color one light and the overlapping track much darker for a high degree of contrast to make the overlap even easier to see.
As an example, I might have the full curve be a bass guitar and the overlap curve be the kick drum. I might make the bass light yellow and the kick black. I would see the full bass track curve, but not the full kick drum---I would only see the area under the bass curve where the kick drum curve is also present, and no other part of the kick drum curve would be visible.
I could very easily spot areas where there was a high degree of coincidence between the two waveforms, and then do EQ cutting to the main track to compensate. I think it would speed up workflow somewhat for that particular kind of task.
Just a thought.
"You don’t expect much beyond a gaping, misspelled void when you stare into the cold dark place that is Internet comments."
---Salon on internet trolls attacking Cleveland kidnapping victim Amanda Berry
---Salon on internet trolls attacking Cleveland kidnapping victim Amanda Berry
-
- KVRAF
- 7030 posts since 28 Apr, 2004 from france
+1 for solo.
Would it be possible to get a similar display as the one in SplineEq?
It is great to see the strenght/impact, and afaik it is the only plugin having such a display (at least with these settings, which to me are perfect).
Would it be possible to get a similar display as the one in SplineEq?
It is great to see the strenght/impact, and afaik it is the only plugin having such a display (at least with these settings, which to me are perfect).
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 14325 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
What do you mean by the strength/impact????sinkmusic wrote:+1 for solo.
Would it be possible to get a similar display as the one in SplineEq?
It is great to see the strenght/impact, and afaik it is the only plugin having such a display (at least with these settings, which to me are perfect).