First official SONAR 4 review is in!
- Beware the Quoth
- 35476 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
"billybk1 quoth
Press "M" to open the Track Manager and hide & unhide any tracks to your hearts delight.
Dont forget you can hide any given track by right-clicking and selecting 'Hide'
Press "M" to open the Track Manager and hide & unhide any tracks to your hearts delight.
Dont forget you can hide any given track by right-clicking and selecting 'Hide'
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
- KVRAF
- 8701 posts since 9 Jan, 2004 from leroyaumeuni
billybk1 wrote:Press "M" to open the Track Manager and hide & unhide any tracks to your hearts delight. You can also group tracks into all audio and MIDI, so one click will hide unhide all your MIDI tracks with one mouse click. With SONAR 4's new improved keybindings you will probably be able to assign that task to one keystroke, Hide/Unhide all MIDI tracks.spaceman wrote: I agree, just a way to hide the midi or audio tracks for softsynths would do for now
that would be a 'work around'
it would be nice though to have one shortcut to show/hide the audio or midi track of the SOFT synths ONLY.. otherwise you have to keep going to the track manager everytime you add a new soft synth and you'd have to make 2 short cuts yourself, 1 for the audio parts, 1 for the midi parts
My other host is Bruce Forsyth
- Beware the Quoth
- 35476 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
Sine Sonar handles audio effects and MIDI effects, I personally think having 1 to N audio tracks and a MIDI track inserted by default makes prefect sense. I cant understand why it would be done differently.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- KVRian
- 694 posts since 6 Aug, 2002 from London, UK
And (agreeing with Mr Wabbit :-)), it makes soft-synths work identically to hardware synths: I need one (or more) MIDI tracks to control the synth and one (or more) audio tracks in order to record the output.
Multiple MIDI tracks for the data makes things far more flexible too: for instance, when creating MIDI drums, whether using external MIDI modules, soft-synths or both, I can have one MIDI track for the kick pattern, one for the snare and so on. If I only had one MIDI track per module (or soft-synth), then a trivial copy of a 4 bar kick pattern would turn into an incredibly painful process.
Multiple MIDI tracks for the data makes things far more flexible too: for instance, when creating MIDI drums, whether using external MIDI modules, soft-synths or both, I can have one MIDI track for the kick pattern, one for the snare and so on. If I only had one MIDI track per module (or soft-synth), then a trivial copy of a 4 bar kick pattern would turn into an incredibly painful process.
-
Stupid American Pig Stupid American Pig https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=4753
- KVRAF
- 7065 posts since 25 Nov, 2002 from not sure
At first I thought that the 1 midi track/1 audio track was a pain as well, but it is INFININTELY more flexible, and I much prefer it now...
-
- KVRian
- 694 posts since 6 Aug, 2002 from London, UK
Although spaceman's suggestion ("hide soft synth") would be sensible.
-
- KVRer
- 19 posts since 5 Jun, 2004
Sonar&Live...that's a fun day for me! Add in a bit of Project5 and Kinetic, the day is complete.
I'm just like a kid in a candy shop with all of the capabilities that both Sonar and Live provide. Consider though, that I migrated off of Mac and Digital Performer a few months ago. Sonar and Live are a true epiphany (didn't use Live on the Mac). Once you unravel the dodgy world of PC-based sound technology, these tools are without peer in my book.
Or perhaps better phrased, they are the tools that give me the most joy to use, plus the added bonus of actual productivity.
I'm really interested in seeing how much of a difference Hyperthreading support makes.
Enjoy all this great technology in whatever way makes you happy.
I'm just like a kid in a candy shop with all of the capabilities that both Sonar and Live provide. Consider though, that I migrated off of Mac and Digital Performer a few months ago. Sonar and Live are a true epiphany (didn't use Live on the Mac). Once you unravel the dodgy world of PC-based sound technology, these tools are without peer in my book.
Or perhaps better phrased, they are the tools that give me the most joy to use, plus the added bonus of actual productivity.
I'm really interested in seeing how much of a difference Hyperthreading support makes.
Enjoy all this great technology in whatever way makes you happy.
munchkin wrote:Many times have I declared this and heard it echo'd through 't land.EricRichmond wrote:Sonar users replied 'We already have that'![]()
![]()
![]()
I'm very pleased with Sonar 4. The multiple takes option is going to be the most useful development for me (considering my crap playing and singing). My only criticism is that synths use up two tracks in Sonar. I wish Cakewalk would think up a more elegant solution like having one track that can be toggled for midi or audio. Or do what Live does and just have a midi track where audio FX can be used. But apart from that I turn to Sonar when I want to record audio.
I have Live 4 and it is very good but in a different way to Sonar. I think they compliment each other. I also have Vegas Video and all three work very well together. Sonar is great for linear recording and song construction. Live takes a pattern based approach so it's great for throwing audio and midi clips at and creating complex pattern based songs. And Vegas combines the two approaches except it doesn't have midi and is audio and video based. All three overlap in their capabilities so it's not very useful to claim that one is better than the other IMO.
-
- KVRAF
- 7489 posts since 6 Jul, 2004
I'll be wanting a look at the S4 demo when it arrives. In the meantime I had a good play with the S3 demo recently.
I liked the Groove Clips, Sonitus fx suite and mixer, also the MIDI editing, which is more indepth than Tracktion (my main sequencer at present).
I didn't like the Synths included in the demo. In fact I couldn't make head nor tail of them!! So I downloaded a Project5 demo to boot, hoping that might make up for Sonar's apparent lack of synths.
Oh dear - that was a mistake. The P5 and Sonar 3 synths all look like they were developed about 15 years ago, and seemed so out of place in a state of the art programme like S3.
I hope that S4 will improve on this.
I liked the Groove Clips, Sonitus fx suite and mixer, also the MIDI editing, which is more indepth than Tracktion (my main sequencer at present).
I didn't like the Synths included in the demo. In fact I couldn't make head nor tail of them!! So I downloaded a Project5 demo to boot, hoping that might make up for Sonar's apparent lack of synths.
Oh dear - that was a mistake. The P5 and Sonar 3 synths all look like they were developed about 15 years ago, and seemed so out of place in a state of the art programme like S3.
I hope that S4 will improve on this.
-
- KVRAF
- 7489 posts since 6 Jul, 2004
Doesn't look like it, no. Which is a shame in my view. Native VST might have swayed me for sure. As it is, I'm not sure...loomchild wrote:Does anyone know if it now handles VSTs natively or does it still require a wrapper like in previous versions?
-
- KVRAF
- 2139 posts since 15 Jul, 2003 from ex-NJ, PA
Are you really basing your decision on the included synths -- especially when there are terrific free ones available?headquest wrote:I didn't like the Synths included in the demo. In fact I couldn't make head nor tail of them!! So I downloaded a Project5 demo to boot, hoping that might make up for Sonar's apparent lack of synths.
Oh dear - that was a mistake. The P5 and Sonar 3 synths all look like they were developed about 15 years ago, and seemed so out of place in a state of the art programme like S3.
I hope that S4 will improve on this.
-
- KVRAF
- 3476 posts since 9 Apr, 2003 from NE Ohio, USA
Dreamstation is junk (I'd use Synth1 and/or Triangle 2 instead), and Edirol VSC (replaced in Sonar4) is pretty meager too.headquest wrote:I didn't like the Synths included in the demo. In fact I couldn't make head nor tail of them!! So I downloaded a Project5 demo to boot, hoping that might make up for Sonar's apparent lack of synths.
Oh dear - that was a mistake. The P5 and Sonar 3 synths all look like they were developed about 15 years ago, and seemed so out of place in a state of the art programme like S3.
In P5, Velocity (drum synth) is IIRC a cut-down version of DR-008, and PSYN is by Rene (RGCaudio). I like PSYN, it's also bundled with Kinetic.
As far as the wrapper: I guess I'm used to it, because both FLS and Sonar use/require wrappers for VSTI. I don't find it to be a serious impediment - I have to re-scan VSTI in other hosts as well. I have DirectIXer because I skipped the Sonar3 upgrade, so when I get Sonar4 I'll have both.
Doug
Logic is a pretty flower that smells bad - Spock, in "I, Mudd"
For a good time click http://www.belindabedekovic.com/video_fl_en.htm
For a good time click http://www.belindabedekovic.com/video_fl_en.htm
-
- KVRAF
- 7489 posts since 6 Jul, 2004
Erm... no, not just on the synths actually! But I think some of the other "deciders" have clearly been sorted in v.4. The synths I'm not so sure...torhan wrote:
Are you really basing your decision on the included synths -- especially when there are terrific free ones available?
-
- KVRAF
- 2139 posts since 15 Jul, 2003 from ex-NJ, PA
I'll agree the included synths are weak. Hopefully, the new TSS-1 (?) (looks like Hypercanvas) will be better.headquest wrote:Erm... no, not just on the synths actually! But I think some of the other "deciders" have clearly been sorted in v.4. The synths I'm not so sure...torhan wrote:
Are you really basing your decision on the included synths -- especially when there are terrific free ones available?
-
- KVRist
- 495 posts since 5 Sep, 2002 from Boston, Mass
I heard on the cakewalk forum that TTS isn't as good as Sampletank LE in terms of sounds...ouch 
If it sounds good it is good.
-
- KVRAF
- 2336 posts since 13 Oct, 2002 from Terra Firma
An example of how to organise synth tracks in a different way to Sonar is how Live 4 does it. A synth is opened in a midi track. That track can have audio and midi effects on it. For multiple outs just open as many tracks as you need and route the synth outs to them. 