Why torment yourself with other systems after all?) If we have 10, then yes, the estimates will be more accurate, but still 1-2/10 will be equal to 1/5, and you are even unlikely to dare to put someone 3/10, because... The" problem " of OSC (actually its a great blessing of OSC!Taron wrote: Mon Feb 15, 2021 9:00 pm Sometimes that happens, doesn't it. I initially felt like my vote wouldn't help one bit, because of all the 5s. So I went through it one more time and still, I just couldn't lower so many of them. Then I went hyper critical and started spreading carefully, whilst still having felt somewhat obligated not to change a few 5er for various reasons. There were, however, actually 2 2s, not as punishment![]()
, but simply because they would've destroyed any justification for the 3s... as weird as that may sound. A system of 5 slots just really is hard, because the results could get so misunderstood. At the end, though...with anything around or near 60 tracks, the whole process is quite exhausting and it might be a blessing to only have 5 ratings (really 4). I still think there should be a "null" slot for the artists own track, then we would at least have all 5 slots for rating.
![]()
P.S. Someone needs to take my bag with exclamation marks and limit my time for writing posts! I can't control myself...
