Yamaha Reface DX vs Korg Opsix
- KVRAF
- 3361 posts since 31 Dec, 2004 from People's Republic of Minnesota
Seems like Yamaha has been doing the Roland thing. Not releases any new cool gear and just rereleasing shitty plastic shells of formerly great products.
-
excuse me please excuse me please https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=427648
- KVRAF
- 1631 posts since 10 Oct, 2018
Don't own any of them, but I think they are both great. I go for the Opsix for sound design. CinkeMusic at YT has some nice vids about it
- GRRRRRRR!
- 17690 posts since 14 Jun, 2001 from Somewhere you're not!
I am a total convert. I used to really hate them, because the early examples were just terrible keyboards, but since things like the KeyStep, Korg's Minilogue/Monologue and even my Seaboard Block, I find full-size keys to be too much like hard work. The Minilogue/Monologue keys, in particular, are fantastic because they have a bit more length, which makes it easier with the black keys.
NOVAkILL : Legion GO, AMD Z1x, 16GB RAM, Win11 | Audient EVO 8 | Lumi Keys | Studio Pro 8
Korg Odyssey, bx-oberhausen, Proxima, PolyMax, GR8, JP6K, Union, Atomika,
Invader 2, Flow Motion, Olga, TRK 01, Thorn, Spire, VG Iron
Korg Odyssey, bx-oberhausen, Proxima, PolyMax, GR8, JP6K, Union, Atomika,
Invader 2, Flow Motion, Olga, TRK 01, Thorn, Spire, VG Iron
- KVRist
- 178 posts since 11 Mar, 2021 from Romania
The Montage / MODX platform, which is more recent than the Reface, is super cool any way you look at it.masterhiggins wrote: Mon Aug 23, 2021 9:22 pm Seems like Yamaha has been doing the Roland thing. Not releases any new cool gear and just rereleasing shitty plastic shells of formerly great products.
Last edited by digitallysane on Tue Aug 24, 2021 4:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- KVRAF
- 26929 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
And if you want a unique and fresh FM hardware synth, check out Kodamo's EssenceFM synth
16 part multi-timbral
300 voices
6 operator with user created algos
etc
etc
16 part multi-timbral
300 voices
6 operator with user created algos
etc
etc
- KVRist
- 178 posts since 11 Mar, 2021 from Romania
The only reason I didn't mention it was the price, but it's THE most interesting FM hardware out right now, IMO.pdxindy wrote: Tue Aug 24, 2021 4:11 pm And if you want a unique and fresh FM hardware synth, check out Kodamo's EssenceFM synth
16 part multi-timbral
300 voices
6 operator with user created algos
etc
etc
- KVRAF
- 26929 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
Yeah... I agree. I want to get one as it supports MPE plus a bunch of other unique capabilities.digitallysane wrote: Tue Aug 24, 2021 4:53 pmThe only reason I didn't mention it was the price, but it's THE most interesting FM hardware out right now, IMO.pdxindy wrote: Tue Aug 24, 2021 4:11 pm And if you want a unique and fresh FM hardware synth, check out Kodamo's EssenceFM synth
16 part multi-timbral
300 voices
6 operator with user created algos
etc
etc
You could create a patch that was a drum machine with 64 voices spread across the keyboard and each voice its own unique 6 operator FM drum sound. What impressive flexibility!
-
- KVRAF
- 1763 posts since 1 Aug, 2006 from Italy
I didn't try the Korg Opsix so I can't make comparisons on the sound engine, but the Reface DX has the best mini keys I ever tried (those keys are good and playable... and I'm not a fan of minikeys!), I think they are in another league in comparison to the Minilogue or the Keystep.
The Korg Opsix looks easier / more user-friendly to program with that panel, though!
The Korg Opsix looks easier / more user-friendly to program with that panel, though!
- KVRAF
- 26929 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
Good to hear. I purchased the Minilogue XD and returned it the next day cause I couldn't stand the keys.sin night wrote: Tue Aug 24, 2021 7:12 pm I didn't try the Korg Opsix so I can't make comparisons on the sound engine, but the Reface DX has the best mini keys I ever tried (those keys are good and playable... and I'm not a fan of minikeys!), I think they are in another league in comparison to the Minilogue or the Keystep.
-
- KVRAF
- 9144 posts since 7 Oct, 2005
One year ago I was also between Reface DX and Korg FM Volca. The FM Volca was only 3 polyphony and doesn't respond to velocity, so I omitted it from the list. Between Reface DX and MODX, I went with the MODX in the end. In that time there wasn't the Korg Opsix in the market. Probably I would go for it instead because it is half the price of MODX, smaller and less complicated interface.
Anyway, in practice, MODX has a better all in one synth/rompler. I ended using presets much more than delving into the endless pages of the FM-X and keep touching the parameters and using the data wheel (keep repeating till my back begin to shout!). That's in the beginning though! After time, the process began to be less painful.
To be honest, I found it much easier to just run FM8 or Blue ii (or any virtual fm synth)! So, IMO, hardware fm synths can't compete with the ease of use of Virtual synths! If I want to buy a hardware synth, I would buy something like Minilogue XD module or something smaller like Uno (Pro). But to be hoenst, I don't need anything hardware!
If I don't have MODX and NI KK M32, I would buy Reface DX as both small light keyboard with FM synth. I can put it beside my PC keyboard and use it also on my laps when my back hurts me! Anyway, I like the MODX as it can act as a keyboard/midi controller/rompler and a fm synth! They keep updating it as well because it has the same software of their flagship MONTAGE. Although it doesn't have great keys! Just normal cheap plastic ones!
Anyway, in practice, MODX has a better all in one synth/rompler. I ended using presets much more than delving into the endless pages of the FM-X and keep touching the parameters and using the data wheel (keep repeating till my back begin to shout!). That's in the beginning though! After time, the process began to be less painful.
To be honest, I found it much easier to just run FM8 or Blue ii (or any virtual fm synth)! So, IMO, hardware fm synths can't compete with the ease of use of Virtual synths! If I want to buy a hardware synth, I would buy something like Minilogue XD module or something smaller like Uno (Pro). But to be hoenst, I don't need anything hardware!
If I don't have MODX and NI KK M32, I would buy Reface DX as both small light keyboard with FM synth. I can put it beside my PC keyboard and use it also on my laps when my back hurts me! Anyway, I like the MODX as it can act as a keyboard/midi controller/rompler and a fm synth! They keep updating it as well because it has the same software of their flagship MONTAGE. Although it doesn't have great keys! Just normal cheap plastic ones!
Using: Cubase Pro 15, Reason 13, Tascam US-4x4HR, MODX6, DM12D, LaunchKey 49, Yamaha guitar(Pacifica 612v) and bass (BB234) and some virtual instruments and synths.
- KVRist
- 178 posts since 11 Mar, 2021 from Romania
Interesting enough, my experience is the complete opposite.EnGee wrote: Tue Aug 24, 2021 10:01 pmAnyway, in practice, MODX has a better all in one synth/rompler. I ended using presets much more than delving into the endless pages of the FM-X and keep touching the parameters and using the data wheel (keep repeating till my back begin to shout!). That's in the beginning though! After time, the process began to be less painful.
To be honest, I found it much easier to just run FM8 or Blue ii (or any virtual fm synth)! So, IMO, hardware fm synths can't compete with the ease of use of Virtual synths!
I find tweaking FM with the MODX to be much faster, intuitive and inviting than FM8 or any other FM soft synth that I tried. It's pretty much the best, quickest FM interface I have experienced.
And I do enjoy the dial and the physical controls.
After some time with the MODX, something like FM8 feels very clumsy to me, fiddling with the mouse among all those tiny menus, tabs and settings.
That being said, you cand get a third party software editor for the MODX and edit it just like a VSTi, if you prefer that.
-
- KVRAF
- 9144 posts since 7 Oct, 2005
What that editor? Tell me please and I'll purchase it. I really don't see how touching parameters and keep switching between 8 operators and their "common" page and editing every stage by that wheel is easier than just seeing all in one page (expert tab in FM8) and just clicking with mouse and dragging! Envelopes are also much easier and flexible!
Yes, it seems we are on the opposite sides
For me, FM8 is still the best in editing than any FM synth because I can see exactly what each operator volume and how it connects. It is also by more flexible than any algorithms based synth because you can freely make any algorithm you want and save it. Blue 2 by Rob Papen is also a great FM/PM/PD synth. You can choose what kind of synthesis and also it has kind of wave sequencing!
When it comes to non analogue synthesis, hardware can't compete with today's software at all
IMO of course!
Yes, it seems we are on the opposite sides
When it comes to non analogue synthesis, hardware can't compete with today's software at all
Using: Cubase Pro 15, Reason 13, Tascam US-4x4HR, MODX6, DM12D, LaunchKey 49, Yamaha guitar(Pacifica 612v) and bass (BB234) and some virtual instruments and synths.
- KVRist
- 178 posts since 11 Mar, 2021 from Romania
http://www.jmelas.gr/montage/perf.php
Well, FM8 (and any matrix based FM synth for that matter) feels unreadable to me, as opposed to algorithm based ones. So what you see as an advantage is just an unreadable mess to me. (One reason I like the Kodamo Essence as well).EnGee wrote: Wed Aug 25, 2021 7:01 am I really don't see how touching parameters and keep switching between 8 operators and their "common" page and editing every stage by that wheel is easier than just seeing all in one page (expert tab in FM8) and just clicking with mouse and dragging! Envelopes are also much easier and flexible!
Yes, it seems we are on the opposite sidesFor me, FM8 is still the best in editing than any FM synth because I can see exactly what each operator volume and how it connects. It is also by more flexible than any algorithms based synth because you can freely make any algorithm you want and save it.
Also, having every OP on a *very easily and quickly* accessible tab again makes it for a more readable and clear workflow, FOR ME. It's a much structured approach that is, in the end, much faster (again, for me). Not to mention that the OP levels are directly adjustable with the physical sliders on the MODX, so no need for a wheel, mouse dragging etc
I'm personally not a fan, at all, of having everything on a cluttered screen (an approach favored by lots of VSTis, including FM8's expert view).
My VSTi of choice is UVI Falcon, and one reason is exactly the structured GUI that splits things logically and allow one to deal with one task at once.
I find the FM-X engine better than most FM VSTis (including FM8). Don't know if it's "the best", but it's certainly very competitive.When it comes to non analogue synthesis, hardware can't compete with today's software at all
Same goes for the AWM2 engine.
Same goes for the Kodamo Essence FM hardware FM synth...
Anyway, we are taking this way off-topic...
-
- KVRAF
- 9144 posts since 7 Oct, 2005
Thanks a lot for the link! I remember I have downloaded this once I bought my MODX but it wasn't complete like now! Or I was just overwhelmed by all the learning process! Anyway definitely I will buy the three ones (Performance, total librarian and Live set). Not sure I need the Wave editor though. I wished if there is a VSTi, but oh well, not a biggie! I think now I can delve better into the parameters with this editor
Yamaha should have made a VSTi editor 
Yes, I agree! The FM synth in MODX sounds nicer (deeper maybe) than other FM synths, but it is a minor difference for me. Oh well, let's jump into the sea of MODX FM. I will start by copying some presets
Oh by the way, Yamaha has a free web tool to convert DX7 presets (thousands online) to MODX/MONTAGE format:
https://yamahasynth.com/index.php?optio ... cle&id=111
Yes, I agree! The FM synth in MODX sounds nicer (deeper maybe) than other FM synths, but it is a minor difference for me. Oh well, let's jump into the sea of MODX FM. I will start by copying some presets
Oh by the way, Yamaha has a free web tool to convert DX7 presets (thousands online) to MODX/MONTAGE format:
https://yamahasynth.com/index.php?optio ... cle&id=111
Using: Cubase Pro 15, Reason 13, Tascam US-4x4HR, MODX6, DM12D, LaunchKey 49, Yamaha guitar(Pacifica 612v) and bass (BB234) and some virtual instruments and synths.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 8674 posts since 24 May, 2002 from Tutukaka, New Zealand
I'm the same with VSTi FM synths. Can't say I exhaustively tested all of them, but the ones I did try were gobbledygook to me. Probably because I learnt FM on DXs (which admittedly is very Byzantine) some of the FM VSTis just didn't make any sense to me. Did not find them easy or fun to program. Whereas Reface is very DX in its programming, so it's familiar to me. Opsix is different but VERY intuitive looking, and based on the same DX idea but translated into knobs and sliders that make sense ( and then additions that are so similar to subtractive programming that everyone knows how to do it)
Actually IMO Korg excel at that. They manage to make very complicated synths much more intuitive to actually use and program. Wavestate is still ridiculously complicated, but Korg somehow made it easier than the Wavestation. I am incredibly impressed with how they implemented FM on Opsix.
I think what I really want is the Opsix, but I want it small like Reface with dinky keys and a dinky size and I'd happily pay more for it. Unfortunately I probably can't have both.
TBH I find it odd...FM should be better in VSTi form, a no-brainer, yet the most tempting FM synths (IMO) are all h/w. Should be the other way around.
Actually IMO Korg excel at that. They manage to make very complicated synths much more intuitive to actually use and program. Wavestate is still ridiculously complicated, but Korg somehow made it easier than the Wavestation. I am incredibly impressed with how they implemented FM on Opsix.
I think what I really want is the Opsix, but I want it small like Reface with dinky keys and a dinky size and I'd happily pay more for it. Unfortunately I probably can't have both.
TBH I find it odd...FM should be better in VSTi form, a no-brainer, yet the most tempting FM synths (IMO) are all h/w. Should be the other way around.