One-Synth-Challenge: General discussion thread
- KVRian
- 575 posts since 30 Jan, 2021
So, using a low pass filter (which is really just a specific EQ) is okay, but once it's automated, it's not?
If you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit.
- KVRian
- 613 posts since 29 Nov, 2019
Indeed - creative filtering is a no-go. Any static filtering and EQ-ing should of course also be applied in such a way that the sound does not become "unrecognizable as coming from the synth."
-
- KVRist
- 226 posts since 14 Jun, 2020 from Adelaide, Australia
Interesting. I thought "modulation effect" was a generic term for chorus, phaser, flanger... A low-pass filter wouldn't come under that heading?ELEX wrote: Thu Jun 09, 2022 8:24 amI'd say no, definitely not, as that would be an external modulation effect. Mod effects are only OK if they're part of the synth.
- KVRian
- 613 posts since 29 Nov, 2019
I'd say that a modulation effect is any effect that uses modulation of it's processor(s) to achieve a characteristic sound. Whether that modulation is related to time ( chorus, flanger, pitchshifters ) or frequency ( filters - phaser, leslie, LPF/HPF/etc.) doesn't matter, imo. Examples of both categories are explicitly mentioned in the rule. Which would logically also apply if one creates one's own versions of these type of effects by automation.
- KVRian
- 575 posts since 30 Jan, 2021
A question about panning: We're allowed to pan sounds in the stereo field as we see fit, right? What about autopanning?
If you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit.
- KVRist
- 411 posts since 3 Oct, 2019
Autopanning has been used before without anyone objecting. I see no harm here.Boy Wonder wrote: Fri Jun 10, 2022 7:05 am A question about panning: We're allowed to pan sounds in the stereo field as we see fit, right? What about autopanning?
- KVRian
- 575 posts since 30 Jan, 2021
Thanks, SeBaer.
If you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit.
- KVRist
- 462 posts since 4 Nov, 2019
I question ELEX's interpretation of modulation effects. I've always taken it to refer just to the class of effects achieved through modulating delays or phase relationships between copies of a sound. To expand this to include any effect that uses modulation of its processes to achieve its characteristic sound would preclude a number of effects which are widely accepted, such as autopanning and volume automation.
I would still not use automation of a low pass filter. I would only use a high pass or low pass filter to trim off the extreme frequencies, or possibly to make room in the mix (though I would favor an EQ shelf). Wanting to modulate the cutoff is a flag that this is becoming part of the sound design. You should consider carefully how much it alters the character of the sound, because the nature of the synth's sound is to be preserved.
I would still not use automation of a low pass filter. I would only use a high pass or low pass filter to trim off the extreme frequencies, or possibly to make room in the mix (though I would favor an EQ shelf). Wanting to modulate the cutoff is a flag that this is becoming part of the sound design. You should consider carefully how much it alters the character of the sound, because the nature of the synth's sound is to be preserved.
Celebrating 50 years of pants with frogs in them
- KVRist
- 124 posts since 31 Dec, 2021
Thank you for the responses. I've digged a little deeper and I'm confused about something else now...
I've just found that the synth does in fact respond to CC brightness/cutoff on my controller which doesn't seem to be a low pass filter but more of a general operator level, so it can lead to quite drastic changes from sine to noise depending on the preset. I can use that, it leads to some interesting results!
I suppose my recorded automation performance of that would be okay since it's using the synth itself and my MIDI controller. However, I notice that there's no parameters on the GUI itself that this appears to be altering directly. It seems to be an under-the-hood expression setting? Is this okay to use?
I've just found that the synth does in fact respond to CC brightness/cutoff on my controller which doesn't seem to be a low pass filter but more of a general operator level, so it can lead to quite drastic changes from sine to noise depending on the preset. I can use that, it leads to some interesting results!
I suppose my recorded automation performance of that would be okay since it's using the synth itself and my MIDI controller. However, I notice that there's no parameters on the GUI itself that this appears to be altering directly. It seems to be an under-the-hood expression setting? Is this okay to use?
- KVRist
- 124 posts since 31 Dec, 2021
That makes this synth a lot more fun then! Thank you for all the help! 
- KVRian
- 575 posts since 30 Jan, 2021
"Modulation" is such a gray word, isn't it? In Plugin Boutique, a modulator search pulls up effects like the Efektor Modulation Bundle which is a chorus, flanger, phaser and tremolo. And the tremolo part is interesting because, if you slow it down enough, it becomes an autopanner as in HY's free HY-TP2 tremolo/autopanner plugin. Or Audio Damage's QuatroMod which is a flanger, chorus, freqshift and diffusor with the diffusor being the gray area because its, according to them, essentially the diffusion block from a reverb.
If you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit.
- KVRAF
- 9542 posts since 6 Jan, 2017 from Outer Space
Modulation in the context of OSC is meant as automation. As long you could draw it in its fine. You would cross the line if you use an oscillator in hearing range to control an automateable parameter. If your automation is capable of audio rate, keep it out of the hearing range… (I’d say max 10 Hz…)
With Midi you could go into hearing range (up to 500 Hz in theory), but if you move a controller by hand its never that high…
With Midi you could go into hearing range (up to 500 Hz in theory), but if you move a controller by hand its never that high…
- KVRAF
- 2479 posts since 22 Sep, 2016
Just a note:
It seems that the reorganisation of the https://sites.google.com/site/kvrosc broke some external links.
I visited the Dexed site: https://asb2m10.github.io/dexed/
This page has a link "Examples" which points here: https://sites.google.com/site/kvrosc/osc-74-dexed
But hit link is dead, because the page has been relocated to https://sites.google.com/site/kvrosc[b]/2015[/b]/osc-74-dexed ... bad luck?
It seems that the reorganisation of the https://sites.google.com/site/kvrosc broke some external links.
I visited the Dexed site: https://asb2m10.github.io/dexed/
This page has a link "Examples" which points here: https://sites.google.com/site/kvrosc/osc-74-dexed
But hit link is dead, because the page has been relocated to https://sites.google.com/site/kvrosc[b]/2015[/b]/osc-74-dexed ... bad luck?
- KVRian
- 1124 posts since 30 Oct, 2013 from Scarborough
Thanks for the heads-up. I have fixed it so this link will now work, but it is likely that other external links may also have become broken by the site overhaul.] Peter:H [ wrote: Wed Jun 15, 2022 9:21 pm Just a note:
It seems that the reorganisation of the https://sites.google.com/site/kvrosc broke some external links.
I visited the Dexed site: https://asb2m10.github.io/dexed/
This page has a link "Examples" which points here: https://sites.google.com/site/kvrosc/osc-74-dexed
But hit link is dead, because the page has been relocated to https://sites.google.com/site/kvrosc[b]/2015[/b]/osc-74-dexed ... bad luck?
https://rjsemper.wixsite.com/website
One Synth Challenge - https://sites.google.com/site/kvrosc/about
One Synth Challenge - https://sites.google.com/site/kvrosc/about
