Stolen samples of real world synths
-
- KVRist
- 54 posts since 19 Jan, 2004 from London
In the case of Sonik Synth 2 which has what I presume are multi-sampled classic analogue synths as part of it's many soundsets.
Would they have to get permission from Moog,Arp etc to do that? I presume buying and using a product like that would not raise any copyright issues later for the users of the product?
Anyone know for sure about this?
Would they have to get permission from Moog,Arp etc to do that? I presume buying and using a product like that would not raise any copyright issues later for the users of the product?
Anyone know for sure about this?
-
- KVRist
- 440 posts since 9 Mar, 2003 from Denver Co
Pentagon,z3ta+,Tassman,Vsampler 3,FM7,Vocator,Sonar 3 Producer,SoundForge,Awave,Vegas 5
SFZ+,P5. And two kick ass DawBox machines!
SFZ+,P5. And two kick ass DawBox machines!
- KVRAF
- 2548 posts since 7 Jul, 2003 from Huntington, WV
It's actually trademarked, not copyrighted.lawapa wrote:In the case of a major manufact the name is copyrighted and you need permission to use that.
take care,
McLilith
-
- KVRian
- 500 posts since 13 Oct, 2004 from Durham, NC USA
Well, here's where things vary from country to country. In the US, if you're using it for your own purposes and not for profit, it's not a crime but you can be sued.
Practically speaking, if you're just doing it for your own purposes, you have little to fear. The chances of being "busted" are slim to none.
Morally/ethically speaking, I'd say it's a gray area -- as usual, you have to make up your own mind. For example, if you own this synth and you're just making samples so you can use the sound more conveniently, I'd like to think the manufacturer wouldn't object (though one never knows). If you had to rent or borrow it, it's considerably less defensable.
People who make samples of sample-based synths and make post them for free to others, or sell them, are definitely violating other people's legal rights, and unless you're of an ethical persuasion (like communism) where intellectual property is an invalid concept, you'd have to conclude that it's ethically wrong.
Practically speaking, if you're just doing it for your own purposes, you have little to fear. The chances of being "busted" are slim to none.
Morally/ethically speaking, I'd say it's a gray area -- as usual, you have to make up your own mind. For example, if you own this synth and you're just making samples so you can use the sound more conveniently, I'd like to think the manufacturer wouldn't object (though one never knows). If you had to rent or borrow it, it's considerably less defensable.
People who make samples of sample-based synths and make post them for free to others, or sell them, are definitely violating other people's legal rights, and unless you're of an ethical persuasion (like communism) where intellectual property is an invalid concept, you'd have to conclude that it's ethically wrong.
Last edited by learjeff on Mon Jan 03, 2005 2:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 6596 posts since 21 Jun, 2004 from Secret Underground Hideout
Thanks for the answers. I can't even see myself recording with the Jupiter 6 samples, but it sure is fun playing rock star with them.
I've downloaded many SFs from the net. There's a good chance they're not all cleared. Have artists been getting sued for using these?
I've downloaded many SFs from the net. There's a good chance they're not all cleared. Have artists been getting sued for using these?
