yea if you could import audio into the video as opposed to just sync it up, it would be awesomeMeloday wrote:I'd like to see a complete solution for video/film scoring within FL Studio. I don't want to have to learn another DAW from the ground up if I don't have to.....
flstudio (whats missing for you?)
-
- KVRAF
- 10597 posts since 13 Jun, 2004 from Alberto Balsam
- Suspended
- 17889 posts since 14 Jun, 2001 from Somewhere you're not!
Which is fine if you know what to look for but so much stuff is hidden away sufficiently well that it may never realise its even there.Carbonboy wrote:Fairly old argument?Image-Line have been putting increasing amounts of effort into doccumentation and the live help system. The FL Bible has been avaliable for some time, the FL5 help is excellent and the FL6 help will be completely up-to-date (or as complete as you can be within the limits of human error and gol adding features almost daily
)
NOVAkILL : Legion GO, AMD Z1x, 16GB RAM, Win11 | Audient EVO 8 | Lumi Keys | Studio Pro 8
Korg Odyssey, bx-oberhausen, Proxima, PolyMax, GR8, JP6K, Union, Atomika,
Invader 2, Flow Motion, Olga, TRK 01, Thorn, Spire, VG Iron
Korg Odyssey, bx-oberhausen, Proxima, PolyMax, GR8, JP6K, Union, Atomika,
Invader 2, Flow Motion, Olga, TRK 01, Thorn, Spire, VG Iron
- KVRian
- 759 posts since 10 Aug, 2004 from Fredericton NB
There's a 'help' menu in the main menu bar. You're grasping at strawsBONES wrote:Which is fine if you know what to look for but so much stuff is hidden away sufficiently well that it may never realise its even there.Carbonboy wrote:Fairly old argument?Image-Line have been putting increasing amounts of effort into doccumentation and the live help system. The FL Bible has been avaliable for some time, the FL5 help is excellent and the FL6 help will be completely up-to-date (or as complete as you can be within the limits of human error and gol adding features almost daily
)
-
- KVRian
- 1443 posts since 27 Dec, 2003
I'd like the ability to "compress" the playlist/patterns. What I mean is, as a song develops you create various MIDI patterns and map them out on the playlist. Later in the process, things are abandoned and I'd like to be able to mark "tracks" in the playlist for deletion, and then do a cleanup that would remove them from the playlist, delete any MIDI patterns associated, optionally remove generators from the SS if no longer used, and then "compress" all the tracks in the playlist - i.e. move higher ones down into the now empty slots and patterns.
Additionally or alternatively I've always wanted to have multiple playlists, presumably tab selectable, for experimenting with arrangements. I'd prefer to have the project file contain multiple playlist arrangements than to have multiple project files.
And while FL is by far not the worst in this respect *cough* sonar *cough*
I would welcome some abilty to organize the plugs menu.
I'd also like to be able to dock some of the windows so that they "stay on top". For example maybe I want the mixer to always occupy a certain part of the screen and always to overlay the playlist or piano roll. If I just nudge one MIDI note in the piano roll, I don't want to have to click the FX button or tab thru all the windows just to get the mixer back. Ditto for channel properties/plug interfaces. Basically I'd like better management of the client windows and some "click reduction" in that regard. Perhaps a tabbed interface that I can leave the plug interface open in one, the mixer open in another, etc.
Additionally or alternatively I've always wanted to have multiple playlists, presumably tab selectable, for experimenting with arrangements. I'd prefer to have the project file contain multiple playlist arrangements than to have multiple project files.
And while FL is by far not the worst in this respect *cough* sonar *cough*
I'd also like to be able to dock some of the windows so that they "stay on top". For example maybe I want the mixer to always occupy a certain part of the screen and always to overlay the playlist or piano roll. If I just nudge one MIDI note in the piano roll, I don't want to have to click the FX button or tab thru all the windows just to get the mixer back. Ditto for channel properties/plug interfaces. Basically I'd like better management of the client windows and some "click reduction" in that regard. Perhaps a tabbed interface that I can leave the plug interface open in one, the mixer open in another, etc.
-
- KVRAF
- 4222 posts since 23 Feb, 2004 from Tucson Arizona USA
The developers seem to *really* want you to take the multi-display approach.mn wrote: I'd also like to be able to dock some of the windows so that they "stay on top".
- Suspended
- 17889 posts since 14 Jun, 2001 from Somewhere you're not!
Is there a chapter called "Features You Won't Find, Even if You Look"? You shouldn't need to reead a manual cover-to-cover or trawl through every screen of the help to work out a piece of software.DavenH wrote:There's a 'help' menu in the main menu bar. You're grasping at straws
You know how many times I have looked at the help in ORION? Once, when SideChains were first added so I could work out how to rig them. 2 minutes in the help system in 5 years. That's intuitive software.
NOVAkILL : Legion GO, AMD Z1x, 16GB RAM, Win11 | Audient EVO 8 | Lumi Keys | Studio Pro 8
Korg Odyssey, bx-oberhausen, Proxima, PolyMax, GR8, JP6K, Union, Atomika,
Invader 2, Flow Motion, Olga, TRK 01, Thorn, Spire, VG Iron
Korg Odyssey, bx-oberhausen, Proxima, PolyMax, GR8, JP6K, Union, Atomika,
Invader 2, Flow Motion, Olga, TRK 01, Thorn, Spire, VG Iron
-
- KVRAF
- 4222 posts since 23 Feb, 2004 from Tucson Arizona USA
Is there a chapter called "Features You Won't Find, Even if You Look"? You shouldn't need to reead a manual [/quote]BONES wrote:There's a 'help' menu in the main menu bar. You're grasping at straws
1. It's not that bad
2. You are arguing vociferously against a piece of software that you don't personally use at all. It's well known that you don't use this software, yet you feel compelled to rail against it.
Bones, that's just plain trolling, and it's unacceptable on KVR.
-
- KVRAF
- 10597 posts since 13 Jun, 2004 from Alberto Balsam
^^actually BONES has used FLStudio a shitload since he beta tested it, no?
-
- KVRAF
- 3158 posts since 2 Jul, 2005 from Stuck in the closet
I'd like FLStudio to be more player-friendly. I feel restricted when I use it for live MIDI sequencing. Its quantising feature needs a lot of improvement too... for those of us who're really bad keyboardists. 
-
- KVRAF
- 4222 posts since 23 Feb, 2004 from Tucson Arizona USA
And after that he became a spokesman for Orion. That doesn't make it okay for him to be unreasonable in the forum. He's trolling. We shouldn't accept that from members who *should* know better.Chase wrote:^^actually BONES has used FLStudio a shitload since he beta tested it, no?
-
- KVRAF
- 10597 posts since 13 Jun, 2004 from Alberto Balsam
He also just gives one man's oppinion which can never be that harmful. He just doesnt sugar-coat his descriptions of things he doesnt like, that's all.
-
- KVRian
- 1283 posts since 13 Nov, 2004
Man you nailed it on the fl help.........it blows!BONES wrote:Is there a chapter called "Features You Won't Find, Even if You Look"? You shouldn't need to reead a manual cover-to-cover or trawl through every screen of the help to work out a piece of software.DavenH wrote:There's a 'help' menu in the main menu bar. You're grasping at straws
You know how many times I have looked at the help in ORION? Once, when SideChains were first added so I could work out how to rig them. 2 minutes in the help system in 5 years. That's intuitive software.
-
- KVRAF
- 5350 posts since 8 Aug, 2003 from Berlin Germany
I would think that some one who doesn't use FL would add a lot to the conversion about what is missing. There is probably something missing that is keeping that person from using it.
For me it's a few things: The audio tracks are no fun; I prefer a buzz like routing system, and (although I hate myself for this,) the graphics turn me off a bit.
I know that's not a what's missing but I could rephrase it into a what's missing if you like.
PS I WANT to like FL. I think the support, price, sequencer, and buzzmachines make it very attractive.
For me it's a few things: The audio tracks are no fun; I prefer a buzz like routing system, and (although I hate myself for this,) the graphics turn me off a bit.
I know that's not a what's missing but I could rephrase it into a what's missing if you like.
PS I WANT to like FL. I think the support, price, sequencer, and buzzmachines make it very attractive.
- KVRian
- 759 posts since 10 Aug, 2004 from Fredericton NB
Agreed. The only reason I look at the help file is to try and point out mistakes to the writers and sometimes, being 100% honest here, because I like how it's written and enjoy the read. If FL doesn't work intuitively for you, fine. Yet I've yet to read a post of yours that contains the words "FL" without a sweeping generalisation about it, which you obviously think applies to every potential buyer of the software.BONES wrote:You shouldn't need to reead a manual cover-to-cover or trawl through every screen of the help to work out a piece of software.
Every time, variations on
"that's exactly it about FL, it obviously flawed in [some fundamental manner], and it reeks of unprofessionalism"
A bot could say as much, and about any program.

