YOU WILL NOT BELEIVE THIS

[A3ntar]

Yes, they are really distorted to create this illusion. In fact most people do not even appreciate these thing when they walk over them

[fabi]

those are cool picture a3ntar. they must look really distorted, when looking from any but the implied angle, though, or am i wrong?

no, you are completely right - I'll post a pic of the lady at the pool from the other side in a few...

great, i was about to say that personally, i'd find photos from the other sides equally if not more amazing.

i couldn't do things of these proportions (wow, a pun... maybe), but i am quite fond of da vishl awhtz. <--- that included...

[jens]

here it is:

[fabi]

you don't happen to have a photo straight from the top, do you? that foot is incredible.

[A3ntar]

Yes, very elongated

Btw, I found that link http://math.ucsd.edu/~crypto/cgi-bin/monty2?2+1047 which seem to be very interristing. LOL. I am sure the numbers are scrwed though. It said that the "non switchers" won 50% of the time, while the switchers won only 0.8% of the time! It even shows negative players numbers..LOL I guess it is an overflow on the type of data he chose?

[jens]

you don't happen to have a photo straight from the top, do you?

nope - I just tried to take one but then the batteries of my digicam went empty...

[james0tucson]

Yes, very elongated

Btw, I found that link http://math.ucsd.edu/~crypto/cgi-bin/monty2?2+1047 which seem to be very interristing. LOL. I am sure the numbers are scrwed though. It said that the "non switchers" won 50% of the time, while the switchers won only 0.8% of the time! It even shows negative players numbers..LOL I guess it is an overflow on the type of data he chose?

It would be very interesting to compare this with statistics taken from the actual TV game show.

[farlukar]

i [...] would probably qualify as math-dyslexic

That has a name, you know


[edit]
Also nice: Escher for real

[mn]

You guys will love these:

Here's some more: http://users.skynet.be/J.Beever/pave.htm