Cubase 7.5 official announcement!

Audio Plugin Hosts and other audio software applications discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS
Cubase Pro 15$579.99Buy

Post

Compyfox wrote:It depends on what you consider "convenient source"...

Marketing Babble and straight lying into your face? (which can be had/found on the Steinberg page as well)

Or users actually testing and reporting what works and what not?


Apples and Oranges... :shrug:
And no other companies do this.....? And by testing you mean going on about how good they are at help to sort out the obscure bugs that only affect them, then you are indeed correct. I also know your opinion about all things Steinberg - I have read it a few (cough) times now.

Just try not entering in a Steinberg thread OK - that is all I ask. It isn't exactly hard
I believe every thread should devolve into character attacks and witch-burning. It really helps the discussion.

Post

Compyfox wrote:It depends on what you consider "convenient source"...

Marketing Babble and straight lying into your face? (which can be had/found on the Steinberg page as well)

Or users actually testing and reporting what works and what not?


Apples and Oranges... :shrug:
Consider this: based on your experiences of Cubase and on my experience, i would start calling you a liar on every thread i see you posting. Would you think that to be a "convenient source" of info on you?

Not bashing you here. Just wan't you to see the other side of the story..
www.mkdr.net

MophoEd - the BEST DSI Mopho Editor VSTi

Post

thejonsolo wrote:But many of the posts here seem very bitter.
Well that's an understatement if I ever heard one. :hihi:

Post

I don't know why some marketing bogus is used as a base to discuss the credibility of a company anyway. When you go to the local market, and buy apples, the guy on the stand will also tell you, that it's the biggest, most healthy apples on the whole market, he won't tell you that they are sprayed with insecticides. ;) It's necessary to make sure the gain is enough, but noone will tell you. Same with marketing everywhere, it will always aim at the big mass, so you have to make it mass compatible. Which means you of course lower the level of presentation, and exaggerate the positive aspects of the product, while fogging the negative aspects. Normal stuff. :shrug:

Post

On the bright side, the 7.x cycle is midstream so 7.5 should have a demo almost immediately.

Hopefully, people who already own 7.06 or whatever won't have to download Halion and gigabytes of content yet again just to demo the new app functions in 7.5. That would be a bit of a bummer.

Post

mkdr wrote:
Compyfox wrote:It depends on what you consider "convenient source"...

Marketing Babble and straight lying into your face? (which can be had/found on the Steinberg page as well)

Or users actually testing and reporting what works and what not?


Apples and Oranges... :shrug:
Consider this: based on your experiences of Cubase and on my experience, i would start calling you a liar on every thread i see you posting. Would you think that to be a "convenient source" of info on you?

Not bashing you here. Just wan't you to see the other side of the story..
Ha! That's a valid point.

For example i have kinda similar setup like he have but i don't have problems. Never had. Not even with previous Cubase setup. I demoed extensively latest C7 and i don't have any issue. Odd. And this is coming from someone who is having computer set up like a 3d modelling computer. Nvidia cards, heavily overclocked (almost 5ghz), being working in Cubase 7 at 96khz, RME madi 32 real phyisical in and out.

No problem...

But then...i've had Ableton v8 when quite a lot of people had problems i did not have them. I don't know. I think i am lucky :)

Anyway it's a valid point when you look it from that perspective but we all know he is not lying.

However i am quite surprised that to this day he is in every Cubase thread, making responses of biblical proportions (while at the same time asking people to not quote his pyramidal threads...that one is weird) and quite honestly i am surprised that he is doing it in every thread :? By the amount of text he is making i can see he have a lot of time.

It's obvious he want to be seen and i do understand his suffering however it is becoming quite lame and stupid. I am actually surprised that Steinberg employee didn't warned admin of this board on his behavior asking for some help or at least warning of some kind.

Compy if you are on your mission to be seen and all that Robin Hood stuff, you can easily create your own thread and bump it here and there with new findings and everyone will see it. I am sure you'll have quite a few friends there as well.

You really don't have to derail every Cubase thread. Even if you are not trying to do it, by now it heavily looks like that - believe me..And believe me when i say that i don't want to mute you because i like to read your tech stuff however i am forced to do it in order to do basic thread reading :(

Post

kmonkey wrote: I am actually surprised that Steinberg employee didn't warned admin of this board on his behavior asking for some help or at least warning of some kind.
DH Miltz(mod) did step in, only on compy's behalf(and in the name of cooling the rhetoric).

If anything, this thread is being taken over now by people whining about compyfox.

Ironic isn't it. :dog:

Post

CTStump wrote:If anything, this thread is being taken over now by people whining about compyfox.

Ironic isn't it. :dog:
You gotta give CompyFox credit for one thing, he's consistent. You can reliably count on him to read Steiny the riot act. :)

Post

LawrenceF wrote:
CTStump wrote:If anything, this thread is being taken over now by people whining about compyfox.

Ironic isn't it. :dog:
You gotta give CompyFox credit for one thing, he's consistent. You can reliably count on him to read Steiny the riot act. :)
But (like i said) i am ok with that, however he doesn't need to destroy every goddamn Cubase thread at KVR. It's not funny or useful. Really it is not.. :?

Post

I hate acronymss but here goes anyway.....


IBTL :phones:

Post

CTStump wrote:I hate acronymss but here goes anyway.....


IBTL :phones:
Things settled down a bit now, so i think you're too late. :hihi:

Post

Compyfox wrote:It depends on what you consider "convenient source"...

Marketing Babble and straight lying into your face? (which can be had/found on the Steinberg page as well)

Or users actually testing and reporting what works and what not?


Apples and Oranges... :shrug:
Users actually testing and reporting what works and what not?

That means 'you' saying the same thing over and over again in five different threads at the same time during a whole year? Are you conscious of how much time you lose writing about this?

Lie to me, please Steinberg, lie into my face. Tell me that you love me and that the grace period starts at 1 January 1880.

I'm seriously (or not) considering asking Presonus to open a Cubase section in their forum. That's the only peaceful board that I know and, after all, every single Studio One user comes from Cubase.

Post

standalone wrote:I'm seriously (or not) considering asking Presonus to open a Cubase section in their forum. That's the only peaceful board that I know and, after all, every single Studio One user comes from Cubase.
I was going to stay out but I'm jumping in, again....

I came to Studio One from Sonar, however I do have cubaseLE(old version) and Studio One is real close to that workflow in the sense of the arrange page and editing tools. I think someone coming from Cubase would have no problems getting up to speed at least from that standpoint.

the KVR forum has a greater membership and is open, the Studio One forum is limited to owners so you wont get the traffic as you do here.

I myself really don't mind the debate but overboard rhetoric does grate at times and I sure wouldn't want to carry over an argument on a forum of another software if anything it belongs here, in a neutral environment.

Please leave Studio One's forum out of this scuffle. :wink:

Post

The S1 forum gets a "soft takeover" on every major product release... although... the Cubase 7.5 thread hasn't grown exponentially like some of the others, Logic X, Sonar X3, etc. :hihi:

It's always ... "compressed" ... though, because only registered users can post in the main forums. The regular "versus" threads on every new product release are almost non-existent there since they made that change.

Before that, the usual stuff, people who have no real interest in S1 starting versus threads to talk about the thing they like being the bestest ever, not really to seek any info about anything. :lol:

Post

Compyfox wrote:Marketing Babble and straight lying into your face....
There's a difference? :shock:

Post Reply

Return to “Hosts & Applications (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.)”