KVR Audio

574X · Post by **574X** » Sun Apr 02, 2017 6:19 am

It's nice if you vote Yea, thank you. I'm grateful for the countless gifts that posting this hard work naturally provides. I publicly apologize for the bad example and inconveniences of posting late. I'm also strong in setting the good example that you should always share your hard work, no matter your circumstances or quality of work thus far. I have a lot to learn and a lot to give and that is the reason I'm here.

Taron · Post by **Taron** » Sun Apr 02, 2017 6:20 am

No way, this is way too good!

... YES, YES, OF COURSE! My vote is YES, too!

Frostline · Post by **Frostline** » Sun Apr 02, 2017 7:30 am

I don't know if my vote will count (since frustration with synth made me abandon my project for the month) but since I can and will vote on the other submissions I think the late entry should be allowed to stay.

nickamandote · Post by **nickamandote** » Sun Apr 02, 2017 7:54 am

I've voted all tracks (haven't participated) - might change a few scores until 15 but as rules say I posted here as a notice.

Taron · Post by **Taron** » Sun Apr 02, 2017 8:21 am

Would be interesting to see a statistic on how many tracks were made per OSC (or per synth without doubles, of course). I wonder, what this would say about them. I mean, I know I missed at least 2 synths I really wanted to make a track with, but still... would be interesting.

vitalker · Post by **vitalker** » Sun Apr 02, 2017 8:39 am

bjporter wrote:Mini Vote:
574X's track unfortunately came in late - should it be qualified? Yea or Nay?

Well, the synth wasn't logical enough But he helped me(and others, I suppose) to create drums with it. So I think we should allow him to participate.

eraze the borders · Post by **eraze the borders** » Sun Apr 02, 2017 11:01 am

bjporter wrote:Mini Vote:
574X's track unfortunately came in late - should it be qualified? Yea or Nay? 10 OSCer votes to decide

Yea!

Even though it minimizes the chances for us other participants to win

Taron · Post by **Taron** » Sun Apr 02, 2017 11:26 am

Voted!
You know, 574X, you've had songs of ratings from 3 to 5 in this one song!

...luckily more 5 star snippets!

Well, if I may dare review a tiny bit...
Overall it was obviously very hard to deal with the rough, crude sound of this curiously raw synth experiment and most of us had a hard time to produce anything that could naturally deal with it. Yet, some few have managed to somehow make it work in its own world, which I find utterly impressive. This time I was more than happy that it was a rather little amount of tracks to go through, hehehehe, but some of them were in fact truly enjoyable to me.
HOWEVER, everyone has done a might fine job considering. GL all!

freethefumes · Post by **freethefumes** » Sun Apr 02, 2017 2:32 pm

bjporter wrote:Mini Vote:
574X's track unfortunately came in late - should it be qualified? Yea or Nay? 10 OSCer votes to decide

I'm going to vote Yea (It was also 574x's suggestion to use Fortune Cookie so he put a lot of time into it)

( 574X's track is on the voting page, though at this point it is considered disqualified unless a yea vote comes in. )

Yes from me too. It's lovely work and the drum advice was invaluable!

bjporter · Post by **bjporter** » Sun Apr 02, 2017 4:09 pm

Looks like we have a majority of votes for stay

Congrats 574X you made it

] Peter:H [ · Post by **] Peter:H [** » Sun Apr 02, 2017 4:29 pm

bjporter wrote:Looks like we have a majority of votes for stay

Congrats 574X you made it

As soon as a "yes" is also coming from participants that wrote sth. like"due to time constraints wasn't able to polish" or like "more abandond than finished" I'm fine. Otherwise I would have a bad gut feeling...
But I would say let's make a deal...one hand washes the other and each side has to put something on the table - We accept late submission but 574X promises not to take any price but leaves it for the next challenge in april if he makes first 5. Deal?

vitalker · Post by **vitalker** » Sun Apr 02, 2017 5:50 pm

] Peter:H [ wrote: We accept late submission but 574X promises not to take any price but leaves it for the next challenge in april if he makes first 5. Deal?

Haha, such an interesting point

TrojakEW · Post by **TrojakEW** » Sun Apr 02, 2017 6:22 pm

Voted!

I know this synth only from pictures

, but from sound I hear in tracks it looks like it was very hard to make percs. Too bad I missed the challenge. Good luck to all.

doctorbob · Post by **doctorbob** » Sun Apr 02, 2017 8:15 pm

Taron wrote:Would be interesting to see a statistic on how many tracks were made per OSC (or per synth without doubles, of course). I wonder, what this would say about them. I mean, I know I missed at least 2 synths I really wanted to make a track with, but still... would be interesting.

Yeah, that would be very interesting. Any chance BJ?

I think though that the more challenging the synth the more we owe it to OSC to persevere and create a track. Yes, for sure we will mostly create "below par" tracks compared to our other submissions - but it's a pretty level playing field, so we can all be "iffy" at the same time eh?

To this end, my next track will be my 38th in a row, and no passes! I worked with the good, the bad and the downright ugly. but always managed to make a track.

dB

Taron · Post by **Taron** » Sun Apr 02, 2017 8:57 pm

Yeah, I was kinda shocked that I'm at track 15 already, having skipped a few, unfortunately, but still... I started May 2015. Soon I'll have my 2 year anniversary!

But 38 in a row, Bob, that's incredible! Not to mention that BJ is almost 10 years at it now, if I calculate this correctly, which is just the most amazing thing! Less than 2 years to go for that! SWEET! I wished we could throw a party then, that's for sure!

...but let's not get ahead of ourselves, hehe...I'm holding back already!

One Synth Challenge #97: Fortune Cookie 2012 by HG Fortune (bh9090 wins!)