And hopefully they will. I still don't think the current version should be wholeheartedly dismissed though.machinesworking wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 4:19 pmI currently own a Memorymoog. I can A/B the demo, and there is massive differences in anything like a complex sound, using the voice modulation at all and the Cherry audio sounds like an emulation from 25 years ago, just white noise and artifacts. The filter is so far away from the Memorymoog filter that it's embarrassing etc. etc. There are always some synth sounds that can be close when you model the layout parameter wise of a synth, but when each circuit is obviously not that close and the sum of those circuits sounds like a cheesy Reaktor attempt from 2003.BBFG# wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 2:49 am It's more likely that it's ODD over OCD.
More OT: I owned a Memorymoog and chose it over a Prophet5 or an Oberheim. As far as the CA software version, I find some patches very accurate while others, not as much. Generally feel there's a presence missing in the bottom end, even though the sound is close enough otherwise. Sure, it can be improved, but it doesn't warrant a complete dismissal unless that's all you want to do with it anyway.
I've mentioned it before in this thread, my initial impression of CA was so bad that I was shocked with how close the Polivoks sounds to any demo I've ever heard of it. It's a great emulaiton, I wish the time had been spent on the Memorymoog emu..
And while the best thing I can say about all of these are the price point, I do enjoy playing them as well. I also find my favorites in their lineup are not these plugins but the lesser ones which I never originally owned. Novachord/Solovox, ProSoloist, Blue 3. In fact, while I played those way back when, I sometimes actually hated them then. I enjoy these way more than I ever did in their hardware form.
