KVR Audio

Teksonik · Post by **Teksonik** » Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:21 am

EnGee wrote: i5-4570 @ high perfomance (@3.2 to 3.43GHz)

Hmmm don't have any problems on my i7 3770K. Yes luSH101 can be demanding but I've done several multi layer patches that don't choke my system. I'll check tomorrow and see what numbers I'm getting.

Oh and I assume you have Multi Threading enabled in luSH101 ?

EnGee · Post by **EnGee** » Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:27 am

Teksonik wrote:
EnGee wrote: i5-4570 @ high perfomance (@3.2 to 3.43GHz)
Hmmm don't have any problems on my i7 3770K. Yes luSH101 can be demanding but I've done several multi layer patches that don't choke my system. I'll check tomorrow and see what numbers I'm getting.

Oh and I assume you have Multi Threading enabled in luSH101 ?

Sorry, my mistake, read the previous post.

Yes, multi threading and high quality all. But i5 has 4 cores while i7 has 8 (hyperthreading).

Teksonik · Post by **Teksonik** » Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:46 am

I'll check your Super S patch tomorrow and report what numbers I get.

EnGee · Post by **EnGee** » Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:51 am

Teksonik wrote:I'll check your Super S patch tomorrow and report what numbers I get.

Thank you

With the buffer size and the host please.
(mine is in a project of 44.1 khz and 128 buffer size, of iTwo audio interface, in Cubase Artist 8.5).

Touch The Universe · Post by **Touch The Universe** » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:01 am

EnGee wrote:
Teksonik wrote:Depends on your CPU. 40% of what ?
of i5-4570 @ high perfomance (@3.2 to 3.43GHz)

Update:
Sorry, it was not high performance.

With high performance, it is about 25% to 30% for the same preset. I'll upload it now:

i5-6200U @2.4ghz =12% with multi-thread enabled in the options menu.

All 16 voices get me to 40%, double check if the multi-thread is enabled

EnGee · Post by **EnGee** » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:12 am

Touch The Universe wrote:
EnGee wrote:
Teksonik wrote:Depends on your CPU. 40% of what ?
of i5-4570 @ high perfomance (@3.2 to 3.43GHz)

Update:
Sorry, it was not high performance.

With high performance, it is about 25% to 30% for the same preset. I'll upload it now:
i5-6200U @2.4ghz =12% with multi-thread enabled in the options menu.

All 16 voices get me to 40%, double check if the multi-thread is enabled

Which preset? and what host/buffer size/audio driver?

Touch The Universe · Post by **Touch The Universe** » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:25 am

EnGee wrote:
Touch The Universe wrote:
EnGee wrote:
Teksonik wrote:Depends on your CPU. 40% of what ?
of i5-4570 @ high perfomance (@3.2 to 3.43GHz)

Update:
Sorry, it was not high performance.

With high performance, it is about 25% to 30% for the same preset. I'll upload it now:
i5-6200U @2.4ghz =12% with multi-thread enabled in the options menu.

All 16 voices get me to 40%, double check if the multi-thread is enabled
Which preset? and what host/buffer size/audio driver?

The attached preset - 44khz via fl studio asio at 1024 buffer and 33ms, 256 buffer with 16ms raises to 15%, using Orion DAW

EnGee · Post by **EnGee** » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:35 am

Touch The Universe wrote:
The attached preset - 44khz via fl studio asio at 1024 buffer and 33ms, 256 buffer with 16ms raises to 15%, using Orion DAW

Ok thank you

I'll check with 256 buffer size and see (of course as it is a pad, i play a chord of 3 notes or 4).

EnGee · Post by **EnGee** » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:55 am

Ok, it seems when I lower the buffer size to 256 (with 10ms/10ms), the results are similar to Touch The Universe results.

I've just did a comparison with 256 buffer size, in both Cubase and Reaper with High Performance in the power options:

A chord of 3-4 notes is about 11% to 13% (in Reaper) and similar indication in Cubase.

Now, if I increase the polyphony from 16 to 32 and the Unison from 2 to 7, it jumps to 20% (both hosts).

This is a great result IMO

, it seems the buffer size from 128 to 256 is playing essential role in my setup. Well, I'm returning to 256 buffer size then and will enjoy LuSH more

Teksonik · Post by **Teksonik** » Thu Oct 06, 2016 8:44 pm

Just tried your Super S patch in Reaper 64 bit, 128 sample latency, 44.1k:

1 note = 1.9 % - 2.5 %

6 Notes = 3.2% - 6.6%

Both luSH101 and Reaper set to Multi-Threading. Using Reaper's meter.

EnGee · Post by **EnGee** » Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:21 pm

Teksonik wrote:Just tried your Super S patch in Reaper 64 bit, 128 sample latency, 44.1k:

1 note = 1.9 % - 2.5 %

6 Notes = 3.2% - 6.6%

Both luSH101 and Reaper set to Multi-Threading. Using Reaper's meter.

Thanks for that

but can you write the RT percentages please? (The real time CPU measure).

Numanoid · Post by **Numanoid** » Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:15 am

Lush 101 is again on sale.

Now costing just $50

https://www.jrrshop.com/d16-lush-101

db3 · Post by **db3** » Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:17 am

No brainer

hivkorn · Post by **hivkorn** » Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:38 am

got it 2 times , sold it 2 times....not bad but not for me even for $50 ...

ATS · Post by **ATS** » Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:45 am

I want it but I'm the process of clearing out a lot of unused stuff already and can't even afford it if I wanted to right now

LuSH-101