I feel the same for the higher frequency range.BobYordan wrote:I tested both for half an hour and they had an excellent
bass respons.
I'm not happy to say that it beats Voxengo Elephant just a little bit.
I feel the same for the higher frequency range.BobYordan wrote:I tested both for half an hour and they had an excellent
bass respons.
Hi gbgeekboy wrote:@Bob
That was my feedback as well. I wished I could have seen the clipped waveforms.
I went ahead and bought it anyway. When I went back to take a look, I noticed that it was easy to over do it and to get "square waves". But then I backed off a bit, and was very pleased with the results (and it was a lot louder). Hope that helps, Bob.
I think it was rather transparent at the highs.PeterL wrote:I feel the same for the higher frequency range.BobYordan wrote:I tested both for half an hour and they had an excellent
bass respons.
I'm not happy to say that it beats Voxengo Elephant just a little bit.
Yes, transparent at the highs is the right word.BobYordan wrote:I think it was rather transparent at the highs.PeterL wrote:I feel the same for the higher frequency range.BobYordan wrote:I tested both for half an hour and they had an excellent
bass respons.
I'm not happy to say that it beats Voxengo Elephant just a little bit.Kind of warm and no added hi-freqs. It also handles overall dynamics/bandwidth good, IMHO.
Cheers
Bob
Hi Bob! We did not do anything to prevent rendering in the demo version but it seems like some Hosts request data that are not available in the demo.BobYordan wrote:I tested both for half an hour and they had an excellent
bass respons.![]()
Sad that there were no presets and that it is not possible to render with the demo.
It would have been nice to be able to look at how eg clippings are handled in a rendered file, before buying.
Cheers
Bob
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026