You know, I love Urs' products, but, I'm not seeing the need for zebra if you have reaktor? Seriously, have you explored carbon? I suppose if one had a bunch of patches or was really familiar with the user interface, that could be compelling, but, outside of that, zebra is the kind of synth that everyone does conceptually, it has lots of features, lots of routing options, and it sounds decent; the same can be said for many reaktor synths. IMNSHO, zebra isn't subtly beautiful like ace or diva, or for that matter, reaktor.4lb Kitty wrote:Okay, finally bought Reaktor and Scarbee MM Bass (well, Komplete 8), but now I need to save for Zebra again.
THEN I'll have everything I need.
I used to use zebra-cm but I found that between reaktor and massive, I didn't need it and it hasn't been re-installed for the last several machine updates. When I demo'd the full zebra a while back I didn't find anything about it sufficiently interesting (read innovative and compelling).
Building feature laden synths is easy in reaktor, what's hard is getting all of the subtle details of a strong emulation or novel workflow, either functionally or visually, right. For me, this drives any new purchase, I don't need "yet another LFO", or "97 bazillion ready to go patches"; what standalone synths must bring to the table is a really compelling feature that is non-trivial to implement in reaktor. In practice, that's actually a really high standard. I would say that very few synths (on the order of one new synth every three years or so) can both meet it and not be too similar to something that I already have.
It's REALLY worth the effort to get to know enough reaktor to take apart and reassemble other people's synths quickly.


