redbull academy
tagged: Wagner, Bayreuth, Dragonblood, Opera, Soprano, Bariton, Siegfried, Kriemhild
Oh right. So I guess we're in agreement that cherry picking and then misrepresenting someone else's words in a way that distorts their position to one which is more easily refuted - aka building a strawman - that would be the sign of a poor argument, yeah?himalaya wrote:Have you really missed all that I wrote, the whole sense of all that I wrote and contributed? [...] perhaps try to see everything in its right context
Ingo, that's what my input and intention was as well.Ingonator wrote:
My own comparison of Saurus and Diva was not for or against any of the both synths. It was just a comparison and to show Saurus could sound analog like and not to show it could sound exactly like Diva.
So this is hopefully my last Saurus vs Diva comment in this thread.
Ingo
I'm not offended and don't want to take anything on a personal level here. I respect you and your opinion. I understand what you're saying about pdxindie's demo. I must have missed those bits of the conversation.himalaya wrote:The Diva example should be taken in relation to pdxindy's Saurus feedback demo. That is the comparison, not my Saurus clip in your quote!
Please, do not be offended, and perhaps try to see everything in its right context.
Oh no. Again.hakey wrote:Oh right. So I guess we're in agreement that cherry picking and then misrepresenting someone else's words in a way that distorts their position to one which is more easily refuted - aka building a strawman - that would be the sign of a poor argument, yeah?himalaya wrote:Have you really missed all that I wrote, the whole sense of all that I wrote and contributed? [...] perhaps try to see everything in its right context
-
Then please follow, at least the very recent flow of conversation, as what you wriote has smeared my character, and that's not what you should be doing, right?chacka wrote:I must have missed those bits of the conversation.
I can't have the power for people to read a page back. That's all you had to do before you showed me in bad light. I was talking with pdxindy and the flow was obvious, what was refered to what.Not everybody is following the whole conversation and still listens to your examples. You don't think that this could lead to a false conclusion?
Cherry picking? Or seeing your first reaction to the clips. It is always the first reaction in comparisons like this that counts.hakey wrote:cherry picking *is* manipulationhimalaya wrote:In short, I used your first reactions to those clips. There was no manipulation of your text or building a 'strawman'. Read all again. ok?
I don't want to smear your character. I just tried very politely to be on topic. And my "I might have missed something" comments were obviously too polite, sorry for that. Can we just leave it at that? No hard feelings here.himalaya wrote:Then please follow, at least the very recent flow of conversation, as what you wriote has smeared my character, and that's not what you should be doing, right?chacka wrote:I must have missed those bits of the conversation.
I can't have the power for people to read a page back. That's all you had to do before you showed me in bad light. I was talking with pdxindy and the flow was obvious, what was refered to what.Not everybody is following the whole conversation and still listens to your examples. You don't think that this could lead to a false conclusion?
see above edited posthimalaya wrote:Cherry picking?
Excellente!hakey wrote:Edit - I missed your reply.himalaya wrote:Read all again. ok?
Okay, friends.
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026