It does, but in reverse.Reverse Engineer wrote:But does it do tarnce?
Kjaerhus MPL-1 Master Limiter is NOW AVAILABLE!
- KVRian
- 921 posts since 14 Oct, 2002 from Sweden
- KVRian
- 921 posts since 14 Oct, 2002 from Sweden
- KVRian
- 1078 posts since 23 Apr, 2003
Torben, will there be an introductory price for the Mac version as well, or do we have to buy the Windows version now and be able to crossgrade later?! Thanks for the clarification, looking forward to buying your limiter...
-
- KVRist
- 478 posts since 14 Jan, 2003 from Denmark
There will be a intro discount for Mac when we release them. Those who want the version for Windows now and Mac later can buy now and get the crossgrade to Mac for free.
Torben
Torben
-
- KVRist
- 406 posts since 31 Jan, 2004 from Sweden
Hi TorbenTorben wrote:Hi Bob! We did not do anything to prevent rendering in the demo version but it seems like some Hosts request data that are not available in the demo.BobYordan wrote:I tested both for half an hour and they had an excellent
bass respons.![]()
Sad that there were no presets and that it is not possible to render with the demo.
It would have been nice to be able to look at how eg clippings are handled in a rendered file, before buying.
Cheers
Bob
The MPL-1 wont clip but it will go right to the edge of the output level you have set. The precision of the look-ahead / attack makes it unnecessary to clip anything as there can simply be no overs.
Torben
Okay, now I can understand the strange behavior while rendering.
So a major peak and and minor peak that happens to trigger the clipping preventing look-ahead get the same treatment?
Cheers
Bob
Cheers Bob
Back for plug development in Sonic Birth.
Back for plug development in Sonic Birth.
-
- KVRist
- 478 posts since 14 Jan, 2003 from Denmark
No, it depends on the length of the peak and PDR settings but generally a transient of a few samples will be released very fast while longer lasting peaks (i.e. drum shots) will be released fast but a little slower than the transient spike. It is all a part of finding the best loudness vs. distortion relationship dynamically.BobYordan wrote:Hi Torben
Okay, now I can understand the strange behavior while rendering.![]()
So a major peak and and minor peak that happens to trigger the clipping preventing look-ahead get the same treatment?
Cheers
Bob
Torben
-
- KVRist
- 478 posts since 14 Jan, 2003 from Denmark
Presets posted before:
Hot (for those with a little respect left for there material)
Clipper (The step before ruining your music by sending it through a real clipper for that last 0.01dB).
And a new one:
Soft Limiting (good at soft material - I like this one)
Enjoy!
Torben
Hot (for those with a little respect left for there material)
Clipper (The step before ruining your music by sending it through a real clipper for that last 0.01dB).
And a new one:
Soft Limiting (good at soft material - I like this one)
Enjoy!
Torben
-
- KVRAF
- 1895 posts since 13 Oct, 2002
Another great plugin, congrats! I'd just like to suggest that despite the fact that you plan on making a metering plugin, it would be really convenient to have Bob Katz's K-system settings available in the MPL-1:
http://www.digido.com/portal/pmodule_id ... page_id=59
RME has implemented these in their Digicheck and I find it extremely useful to standardize mastering output levels for different uses (movie, pop and broadcast).
Thanks!
Breeze
http://www.digido.com/portal/pmodule_id ... page_id=59
RME has implemented these in their Digicheck and I find it extremely useful to standardize mastering output levels for different uses (movie, pop and broadcast).
Thanks!
Breeze
-
- KVRist
- 478 posts since 14 Jan, 2003 from Denmark
Many have said so. I just don't like to implement it half way, so when we do it we will do it right and I do not think that is easy in the present design.Breeze wrote:Another great plugin, congrats! I'd just like to suggest that despite the fact that you plan on making a metering plugin, it would be really convenient to have Bob Katz's K-system settings available in the MPL-1
Thanks
Torben
-
- KVRist
- 166 posts since 23 Feb, 2006
I guess you guys know that top mastering engineers prefer clipping there A/D converters rather than using limiting? Seriously. I can get you a recent Bob Katz quote for the unbelievers. They are using the real high end A/D converters (Lavry Gold, Prism etc), which are far superior to Apogee or budget stuff. Bob was very clear to explain that although these converters may have analog and digital limiters, these are disabled first. They are literally clipping the converters.
So if you want to mix ITB and compete with today's respected mastering engineers, you've got to consider clipping very seriously.
PS - before anyone rushes to deny this information, check your facts very carefully, because this is verifiable.
So if you want to mix ITB and compete with today's respected mastering engineers, you've got to consider clipping very seriously.
PS - before anyone rushes to deny this information, check your facts very carefully, because this is verifiable.
- KVRAF
- 6478 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
Uhhhhm,
NO SHIT SHERLOCK!
Kiwburger, perhaps you haven't been reading this thread, or other similar ones since maybe early last year. It has been mentioned, what, 4 times even in this very thread.
And it's by no means a superior method to standard mastering limiter stock. It's *a* method. "the right tool for the job" very much applies.
NO SHIT SHERLOCK!
Kiwburger, perhaps you haven't been reading this thread, or other similar ones since maybe early last year. It has been mentioned, what, 4 times even in this very thread.
And it's by no means a superior method to standard mastering limiter stock. It's *a* method. "the right tool for the job" very much applies.
-
- KVRAF
- 1933 posts since 29 Apr, 2005 from Beyond all space, time, and dimension.
That earlier post of yours was good point, though. Mastering engineers are a strange lot, though. They know all kinds of secret mojo we may never hope to understand.Kiwburger wrote:Post edited - not worth responding to that shit.
Here is my small version:
PLEASE VISIT www.thehungersite.com DAILY AND CLICK THE LINKS. THEY DONATE MONEY TO CHARITY BASED ON AD INCOME. IT'S FREE!
PLEASE VISIT www.thehungersite.com DAILY AND CLICK THE LINKS. THEY DONATE MONEY TO CHARITY BASED ON AD INCOME. IT'S FREE!
-
- KVRist
- 124 posts since 24 Oct, 2004
Well,
I for one remember pretty well what Bob Katz also wrote about limiting (and yes, sure, most prefer not having to limit (hard)). he also mentioned the oversampled limiter for the MD3 Brickwall, because it does not cause intersample peaks. And he did not say that to make clear it has to been avoided.
I for one, not a mastering guy, prefer material that is not clipped in any ways. Pretty simple.
best
I for one remember pretty well what Bob Katz also wrote about limiting (and yes, sure, most prefer not having to limit (hard)). he also mentioned the oversampled limiter for the MD3 Brickwall, because it does not cause intersample peaks. And he did not say that to make clear it has to been avoided.
I for one, not a mastering guy, prefer material that is not clipped in any ways. Pretty simple.
best
-
- KVRist
- 478 posts since 14 Jan, 2003 from Denmark
Kiwburger, from what I understand, some mastering engeneers clips the A/D in a few transients durring a whole song, after you processed the audio with analog equipment. It is in no way a general substitute for a mastering limiter.
Torben
Torben

