But the thing is: everyone else is corroborating what he's saying...Shy wrote:You, troll, are the one who is trolling, claiming a whole lot and offering not a single proof for your ridiculous claims.dusted william wrote:shy is just trolling,
I can only think he is a re-incarnate of some other regular. Even if he's been around since '04
dw
Which reverb can rival/test Waves trueverb??
-
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
-
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Man, I'm telling you: they're right; you definitely get a cleaner mix this way. A 450M mix...but better-sounding! 
-
- KVRAF
- 4867 posts since 18 Dec, 2000
I am giving the exact steps for someone to recreate this on their own system, using their own synths, and listening with their own ears.Shy wrote:You, troll, are the one who is trolling, claiming a whole lot and offering not a single proof for your ridiculous claims.dusted william wrote:shy is just trolling,
I can only think he is a re-incarnate of some other regular. Even if he's been around since '04
dw
I would understand the need to post examples if I were the only one on this forum who had a synth and a host, but I'm pretty sure that isn't the case.
dw
-
- KVRAF
- 4867 posts since 18 Dec, 2000
A better sounding mix is the holy grail we all strive for.bduffy wrote:Man, I'm telling you: they're right; you definitely get a cleaner mix this way. A 450M mix...but better-sounding!
dw
-
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Indeed! Except the answers are usually tougher than this!dusted william wrote:A better sounding mix is the holy grail we all strive for.bduffy wrote:Man, I'm telling you: they're right; you definitely get a cleaner mix this way. A 450M mix...but better-sounding!
dw
I think I'm going to owe you a big "thanks" on my album liner notes... Oh, and I apologize for being in opposition before. 
Hey, is it normal for an audio editor to take 30 minutes to make an mp3 from a 192khz wave file?
-
- KVRAF
- 4867 posts since 18 Dec, 2000
bduffy,
Out of curiosity, did you just render at a higher rate, or did you mix and then render at the same high rate? In the beta of EXt2 you can render at ridiculous rates, but my last beta of over three months or so was screwing some things up.
no problem with the opposition here at all.
I first learned of audiomove from Kingston.
dw
Out of curiosity, did you just render at a higher rate, or did you mix and then render at the same high rate? In the beta of EXt2 you can render at ridiculous rates, but my last beta of over three months or so was screwing some things up.
no problem with the opposition here at all.
I first learned of audiomove from Kingston.
dw
-
- KVRAF
- 4867 posts since 18 Dec, 2000
-
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Yeah, me too, thanks Kingston!dusted william wrote:bduffy,
Out of curiosity, did you just render at a higher rate, or did you mix and then render at the same high rate? In the beta of EXt2 you can render at ridiculous rates, but my last beta of over three months or so was screwing some things up.
no problem with the opposition here at all.
I first learned of audiomove from Kingston.
I just rendered at the higher rate; I was mixing at 44/32.
EDIT: apologies for the hhijack too! But I think we've p0wned this one..
-
- KVRAF
- 1615 posts since 28 Mar, 2005
*IN THEORY * sr shouldn't make a difference. Well implemented filters like say Sonalksis sound damn similar at 44 and 88. BUT some other eg AirEQ sound MUCH better at 88. Shouldn't be, but it is. The problem sith upsampling is that the downsampling algos are VERY DIFFICULT to do right adn you can really screw things up on the way back to 44k if you do it in the digital domain.... prolly a good way to go would be to mix @ 96, and deliver 96 khz masters. Let the mastering engineer handle the resampling as part of the mastering process.....
-
- KVRAF
- 4867 posts since 18 Dec, 2000
-
- KVRAF
- 4867 posts since 18 Dec, 2000
that's where r8Brain comes in to the picture.semiquaver wrote:*IN THEORY * sr shouldn't make a difference. Well implemented filters like say Sonalksis sound damn similar at 44 and 88. BUT some other eg AirEQ sound MUCH better at 88. Shouldn't be, but it is. The problem sith upsampling is that the downsampling algos are VERY DIFFICULT to do right adn you can really screw things up on the way back to 44k if you do it in the digital domain.... prolly a good way to go would be to mix @ 96, and deliver 96 khz masters. Let the mastering engineer handle the resampling as part of the mastering process.....
dw
-
- KVRAF
- 2049 posts since 18 Sep, 2003 from Seattle USA
Do you believe R8Brain Pro might be up to the task?semiquaver wrote:...The problem sith upsampling is that the downsampling algos are VERY DIFFICULT to do right adn you can really screw things up on the way back to 44k if you do it in the digital domain...
-
- KVRAF
- 4867 posts since 18 Dec, 2000
I believe that the free audiomove is up to the task, but r8brain pro is probably better.kylen wrote:Do you believe R8Brain Pro might be up to the task?semiquaver wrote:...The problem sith upsampling is that the downsampling algos are VERY DIFFICULT to do right adn you can really screw things up on the way back to 44k if you do it in the digital domain...
dw