FR theme: Performance/Graphics issues

Official support for: energy-xt.com
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Can't believe i had to dig this one up from the 4th page...

Well, nothing as been done AFAICT, so here is a big ass bump.

Post

Just fired the official release on my centrino 1.5Ghz, 1024MB ram, Line6podXT ASIO@1024 samples, task monitor shows CPU at 40%, dragging the windows peaks the CPU at 90% and playback glitches and then stops...
Same problem with ASIO4ALL with a 1024 buffer.




XT2 is simply unusable ....

Samplitude 9 Pro demo and sonar 6 web trial both run flawlessly with small buffers, so does tracktion 1.6 NFR and Reaper...

Please fix this GUI rendering problem, it really looks like all the rendering is done on the CPU (feels like running KDE under linux with with no video driver installed, with no HW accel for graphics rendering)...

Post

I don't know if anyone's mentioned this already, but grid drawing seems to be a massive slowdown on displays > 1280x1024.

Basically, if I have a full-screen MIDI editor and set the Grid Size to "Bar", I can zoom in and out quite happily, notes can be entered easily and velocities edited easily.

However, if I set the Grid Size to "16" or greater, then suddenly everything goes into major slowdown.

I'm certain a large part of the issue is down to the graphics primitives rendering code (and, imvho, I think this carries on to every GUI-related problem in XT2). I can have full-screen displays in Podium, etc. which use fully scalable, opacity driven primitives but with no slowdown or sluggishness whatsoever.

Post

Is the performace better for you guys?

Post

soma wrote:Is the performace better for you guys?
haven't been working on some songs with xt2, but just looking at the task manager's cpu meter, it doesn't seem so...

Post

Anyone else who was having problems notice any changes?
I'll keep it as an issue if I don't hear back by Friday.

Post

Well, GUI performance is still very bad :-(

Post

i'm wondering how many pages we'll have to go through before getting any kind of heads up on this...

Post

i had extreme problems with performance as i stated somewhere. i stated i got crackles starting at 40% cpu usage. after turning off hyperthreading (using a p4 3.2 ghz) i can push the cpu up to 80-90% with 512 samples. crackles occur occasionally but not as bad as before and setting latency to 1024 cures the crackles. will do more testing and report...

my guess is that xt2 uses (when hyperthreading is on) only one cpu for audio and the other one for graphics. maybe some people experiencing problems could try this out.

that said the "big players" show still a better performance but i have the feeling that the gap gets smaller.

Post

Performance issue.

Comparing with energyXT1 and XT2.

XT1 has no issues with Pitch bending.

XT2 tends to not capture every single Pitch bend event, resulting in a sort of quantized, non-smooth bend, from realtime MIDI input.

Post

Are people still having graphics issues?

Post

PM-740, 2Gb, XP Pro SP2, GeForge Go6400

1. Sometimes XT2 kills ObjectDock. Shuts it down. End. Exit. Bye. Can't replicate, very strange indeed.

2. Windows leave pixel traces... sometimes.

3. Moving clips causes 5-40% CPU rise, which is pretty much the same in REAPER.

Post

soma wrote:Are people still having graphics issues?
yes, I have a problem with the sliders display of DKS Pro from Arald FX...

Post

[quote=".
2. Windows leave pixel traces... sometimes.
[/quote]
yess, had the same with xt1.

Post

Still sluggish midi editing fullscreen on anything > 1280x1024 ... and I have an ATI X1950... which plays Bioshock in full detail and lovely antialiasing... go figure. :lol:

(I wish jorgen would put the GDI=1 trick back into XT, it made everything lovely and fast)

Post Reply

Return to “energyXT”