KVR Audio

loomchild · Post by **loomchild** » Tue Apr 26, 2005 10:15 am

pseudonoise wrote:
loomchild wrote:Logic is an open system, you can use wrappers.

Pseudonoise: You have not only compared two totally different kinds of reverbs(a convolution one_logic's_ with a classic one_fruity's_) but you have based your very meaningful comparison on the GUI criterion.

Cream of the crap indeed.
Whatev, so comparing a VW Beetle engine to an F1 engine isn't valid because they use different technology? I guess it's invalid to compare any two programs that have different algorithms then? WTF.

Besides, a classic reverb is just a VERY rough mathematical approximation of the sound space that a convolutional reverb models exactly off a ping. So the comparison is completely valid.

Convolutional reverb is better, period.

And if you read my original post in this thread, my whole point was that it was impossible to work on the cutting edge of sound design using FLStudio component. So comparing FL Reverb to a component that works on a 100x more advanced algorithm is the perfect argument.

Fl studio being a VSt host, it would be idiotic to base your whole argument on what's bundled with it. In particular when comparing it with an app that costs 6.6 times more.

quantitatively, there is no difference in audio processing

Have you at least tried to understand what he/she meant by that?

fateamenabletochange · Tue Apr 26, 2005 10:18 am

hey loomchild,you are a child that is looming ,that is close to getting out of diapers,that is looming close to a new way of being,all it will take is one final push from your mumma,but you understand she doesn't want to because of the pain.

loomchild · Post by **loomchild** » Tue Apr 26, 2005 10:19 am

fateamenabletochange wrote:hey loomchild,you are a child that is looming ,that is close to getting out of diapers,that is looming close to a new way of being,all it will take is one final push from your mumma,but you understand she doesn't want to because of the pain.

sounds interesting.

Rangtangtang · Post by **Rangtangtang** » Tue Apr 26, 2005 10:22 am

Also, anyone tried Delta SP, its a sequencer, a little bit complicated, but its got a plugin builder if your interested.

Here at http://www.pcpages.com/deltasp2002/index.htm

There is some free VSTi there that should work on most programs, for you to download.

fateamenabletochange · Tue Apr 26, 2005 10:22 am

i don't like fruit on my computer

Timbre · Post by **Timbre** » Tue Apr 26, 2005 10:23 am

all BULLSHIT talk.....its all in the composer, what and how the composer/producer uses his/her tools. FLstudio can do same output quality as any other host, can run all plugins as any other host...

to begin with, the thread question was obsolete.

fateamenabletochange · Tue Apr 26, 2005 10:30 am

I am also jaundiced against FL because the people in the non-virtual world that I live in that have raved about it have been uniformly shallow and in my opinion wouldn't have a clue.Of course,this does not apply to 99.8% of fruityloops [f**king silly name ] users,although I wouldn't be too sure about this last assertion...because......I do not like fruit on my computer.

Karbon L. Forms · Post by **Karbon L. Forms** » Tue Apr 26, 2005 10:30 am

Is any profressional music actually made with FLStudio?

Hope not...

fateamenabletochange · Tue Apr 26, 2005 10:32 am

and I agree with Timbre,but I do not like fruit on my computer.

spaceman · Post by **spaceman** » Tue Apr 26, 2005 10:49 am

It's called FL now, not fruityloops

and you are all gay

MOOOOOO!!!!!!!

CypherOne · Post by **CypherOne** » Tue Apr 26, 2005 10:51 am

spaceman wrote:It's called FL now, not fruityloops

and you are all gay

MOOOOOO!!!!!!!

glad that's all cleared up.....NEXT!

oh and moooooo to you tooooo

GypsyJazz · Post by **GypsyJazz** » Tue Apr 26, 2005 10:52 am

pseudonoise wrote:

If you read my original post in this thread, my whole point was that it is impossible to work on the cutting edge of sound design using FLStudio components. So comparing a FL Studio component to one that is 100x more advanced is the perfect argument.

But I'm not and don't want to work on the cutting edge of sound design!

I'm just a muso who wants to write and record some songs.
As for your comparison between a Beetle and an F1 car.
An F1 car is useless for everyday travel.
I'll take the beetle anyday!

The whole disscussion about "cutting edge" high quality sound is just
useless when most people are listening to music via 128 kbit MP3s.
They don't care about your flash Convolution Reverb with it's amazing GUI!

They just wanna party!

Me too.

fateamenabletochange · Tue Apr 26, 2005 10:56 am

most people are listening to 192 kbps,but I suppose the diff. don't matter if your a fruity user.

fateamenabletochange · Tue Apr 26, 2005 10:59 am

fruity to appeal to young people and loops because they actually don't play an instrument [which is not to say that they don't have considerable musical talent.

dazzer · Post by **dazzer** » Tue Apr 26, 2005 11:42 am

http://audioshots.com/auditorium/viewtopic.php?t=1073 made in fruity loops 5.oh!!! i mean fl.he,he,he.