are you serious???John Vulich wrote: You mean like the profanity censorship going on here? Or banning members like Sicklecell666?
btw, whats up man?
are you serious???John Vulich wrote: You mean like the profanity censorship going on here? Or banning members like Sicklecell666?
Again, that's a common misconception.Andrew Vernon wrote:Like admins have a right to do whatever the fcuk they like. THEY DON'T.
that was the creep posting pics of dead hurricane katrina victims, right? i'm sorry, i don't care what anyone's views on censorship are, that kind of crap is NOT what i come to this forum for.John Vulich wrote:You mean like the profanity censorship going on here? Or banning members like Sicklecell666?kevvvvv wrote:Forums that put straight jackets around their members quickly start to fail.
If this were the real world, people would encourage each other to fight against injustice. That doesn't happen on the internet, but it should.Markleford wrote:Again, that's a common misconception.Andrew Vernon wrote:Like admins have a right to do whatever the fcuk they like. THEY DON'T.
They *can* do whatever they want. Running the server and providing bandwidth gives them that right.
It's just the sad truth. Maybe it's not how you think it *should* be, but there it is all the same.
But it's your right to say, "Fcuk this noise, I'm out of here." It's also your right to start up your own forum and run it however you want.
I also think that NSS is too heavy-handed, but I admit that it *is* entirely within their right to run their forum how they'd like.
- m
Got back from Tahoe last week. And you? How is Japan?soulkraka wrote:are you serious???John Vulich wrote: You mean like the profanity censorship going on here? Or banning members like Sicklecell666?
btw, whats up man?
Interesting post, RO, and one that seems to re-inforce the commercial nature of NSS.ResonantOrder wrote:But what about those of us who pay for a product? I asked the dealer if there was any support for EWQLSO when I bought it, and he said that they had their own forum. I thought that was cool, and bought it. I should have investigated it more. The forum link takes me to the NSS forum. I've been around a while and have never gone to that site because of all the negativity I've read here on KVR. Had I known that the only forum they support is the NSS forum, I wouldn't have bought the product.
To add insult to injury, the forum wouldn't even let me register using my yahoo account. My ISP has switched hands four times since I signed on (there is only one broad band company here) and the email system has been borked for over a year with no fix in site. My ISP email simply will not work or my messages get routed to someone else's box.
Blah. I was looking for a community to discuss orchestral sample cds, and maybe learn something.
I won't make the mistake of buying from EW again.
Thanks for the link.Armadillo wrote:Not a direct competitor as they are certainly not nearly as big but http://www.vi-control.net/forum/forum.php have been made by NSS outcast and is slowly growing. No one has been banned there yet AFAIK.kevvvvv wrote:Forums that put straight jackets around their members quickly start to fail.
If NSS are buggering it up with censorship, then just watch - they'll shrink or go down the tubes.
As phz says, and I agree with him, at KvR we're moderate-ors.
btw does NSS have any competitor sites of a similar high quality?
I agree with you there.Lovesign wrote:IMO, NSS is a commercial forum in the guise of a community forum.
Is there a dollar value to be placed on "Big Overlord Vendors" versus "Small Oppressed Vendors"?A single post on NSS is not going to harm the sales of GPO or any other advertiser on there. GPO sells for around $250, IIRC, Hollow Sun CD's are $55.
I like to think so, too.KvR seems to strike a better balance.
Fortunately, we're allowed to supplement our information intake with any number of sites that we want! Anybody that restricts themselves to only one source of news or information, no matter what the subject matter, is doing themselves a disservice.Sure, it gets it's fair share of innappropriate postings, but the rules are more about creating a sense of community and free opinions. For a large proportion of the time it works very well.
The point I was trying to make was the difference between the size of company and market value of their products.Markleford wrote: Is there a dollar value to be placed on "Big Overlord Vendors" versus "Small Oppressed Vendors"?
Interesting. I wasn't aware of this, but am not surprised by it either.Markleford wrote:East West Sounds Online have products in the range of *thousands* of dollars, yet themselves came in conflict with the NSS rules. They didn't like the result, so they created their own forum. As a result of their policy, NSS lost hosting and advertising dollars from EWSO *and* lost a bit of their user traffic that no longer went there for product support.
I have nothing personal against any of the "paying" developers, in fact I have had very pleasant dealings with Francis at Bela D in the past and hope they continue, and GPO is undeniably good stuff.Markleford wrote:If your beef is against NSS policy, you really shouldn't blame those vendors that *do* pay their dues and "play the game". Once you do realise that it's a commercial forum, it makes sense. Hate the rules, not those who abide by then.
E/W quit NSS. They now have their own forum.ResonantOrder wrote:
Blah. I was looking for a community to discuss orchestral sample cds, and maybe learn something.
I won't make the mistake of buying from EW again.
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026