KVR Audio

arke · Post by **arke** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 9:21 pm

This is about the stupidest test you could ever do. Instead, he should have had the samples route directly to the output in Reason, and used them as samples and not audio tracks in Cubase, and NOT processed them with sound forge.

jupiter8 · Post by **jupiter8** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 9:43 pm

You wanted to know what we thought of the test, huh....
Ok, brace youselfes [Hatemode on]
What a completley f**king wanker idiot!!!!
I can't believe what i am reading!!!!!
First off all from a scientific point of view the test is flawed in so many ways it's not even funny.
Second, does he think for a minute that the programmers at Steinberg and Propellerheads don't have a clue???
This bloody summing nonsence has to stop NOW GODAMMIT!!!
He should be f---ing trainspotter or go and have a good wank or something instead of doing such piss!!!
OMG i'm so angry i can't even argument anymore
AAAAARRRRRGGGGHHHHH
[hatemode off]
Hmm, quite amusing reading.There might be something there.Maybe i should do some testing on my own.

Foxglove · Post by **Foxglove** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 10:35 pm

Hmmm...

1) Waste of time doing the test
2) Waste of time listening to the test
3) Waste of time arguing about the test

Just kidding guys

Interesting, but pretty useless

bduffy · Post by **bduffy** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 10:44 pm

Foxglove wrote:Hmmm...

1) Waste of time doing the test
2) Waste of time listening to the test
3) Waste of time arguing about the test

Just kidding guys

Interesting, but pretty useless

Why do I keep clicking on this thread? What is wrong with me??

G&L_player · Post by **G&L_player** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 10:50 pm

jupiter8 wrote:You wanted to know what we thought of the test, huh....
Ok, brace youselfes [Hatemode on]
What a completley fkucing wanker idiot!!!!
I can't believe what i am reading!!!!!
First off all from a scientific point of view the test is flawed in so many ways it's not even funny.
Second, does he think for a minute that the programmers at Steinberg and Propellerheads don't have a clue???
This bloody summing nonsence has to stop NOW GODAMMIT!!!
He should be f---ing trainspotter or go and have a good wank or something instead of doing such piss!!!
OMG i'm so angry i can't even argument anymore
AAAAARRRRRGGGGHHHHH
[hatemode off]
Hmm, quite amusing reading.There might be something there.Maybe i should do some testing on my own.

Dude,

Don't take it the wrong way, but you're a funny bastard! I LMAO when I read your response!!

kritikon · Post by **kritikon** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 11:03 pm

Seems pointless to me too.

As for summing - what summing is going on when you only play one sample on its own?

I suppose it's not any sillier than some of the X vs Y topics that get thrown up around here though. A caterpillar vs a gorrilla...which one is most like a bacon butty?

jupiter8 · Post by **jupiter8** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 11:20 pm

Dude,

Don't take it the wrong way, but you're a funny bastard! I LMAO when I read your response!!

Glad i could be of service.

Seems pointless to me too.

As for summing - what summing is going on when you only play one sample on its own?

I suppose it's not any sillier than some of the X vs Y topics that get thrown up around here though. A caterpillar vs a gorrilla...which one is most like a bacon butty?

Yeah perhaps but hopefully the caterpillar vs gorilla dudes have some irony about it.

This moron was dead serious.

bduffy · Post by **bduffy** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 11:23 pm

Maybe one day we just won't respond to these posts. One day...

The Chase · Post by **The Chase** » Sun Dec 11, 2005 12:01 am

They're doing the test again. Hold tight.

shanecgriffo · Post by **shanecgriffo** » Sun Dec 11, 2005 12:20 am

has anyone actually made any music today????

The Chase · Post by **The Chase** » Sun Dec 11, 2005 12:27 am

shanecgriffo wrote:has anyone actually made any music today????

No what are you gay?

peejunk · Post by **peejunk** » Sun Dec 11, 2005 1:06 am

jupiter8 wrote:This bloody summing nonsence has to stop NOW GODAMMIT!!!

LOL, I used to feel a lot like you. All I've ever got from it are two pretty personal (in the end) beefs, one on the Grid and one on a local usenet group (the latter, as you might have noticed, spilled over to KvR and turned into a nasty display of nationalism) with self-righteous audio subjectivists, and some more DSP knowledge I sometimes looked up to back my arguments.

Anyway, just read up on the subjectivist/objectivist debate. It's been going on for years in audiophile circles. I did just recently. It's very liberating to discover there are people that had digested a lot more of their own liver over this subject than you have, and it's still futile.

Muzik 4 Machines · Post by **Muzik 4 Machines** » Sun Dec 11, 2005 1:59 am

reason_2.5_was_32_khz
reason3_really_works_at_lewast_44.1KHz

Ildon · Post by **Ildon** » Sun Dec 11, 2005 2:25 am

cyberpink wrote:reason_2.5_was_32_khz
reason3_really_works_at_lewast_44.1KHz

Is_your_space_bar_broken?

bduffy · Post by **bduffy** » Sun Dec 11, 2005 3:20 am

Ildon wrote:
cyberpink wrote:reason_2.5_was_32_khz
reason3_really_works_at_lewast_44.1KHz
Is_your_space_bar_broken?

Looks that way:

http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic ... highlight=

What's the deal with the underscores? And what you said is totally false, even if it made sense.

EDIT: I see you explained the underscores, although if the underscore is permanently on, wouldn't it look more like this?

______hi______i___say________things_______________

Reason vs. Cubase Blind Testing @ DOA