What's you secondary DAW
-
christianmusicmaker christianmusicmaker https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=12152
- KVRAF
- 1670 posts since 1 Feb, 2004 from UK
Two host polls and still no listing for P5. 
-
- Banned
- 18651 posts since 2 Oct, 2001 from England
according to the polls, he's asking about DAW's, not hosts....dont think he actually knows what he is talking about...christianmusicmaker wrote:Two host polls and still no listing for P5.
-
- Banned
- 2631 posts since 12 Oct, 2005 from the garden state
If only you had said 'bet'Warmonger wrote:I predict eXT will clean up in this poll.
maybe I could've had a little something on the side to make this thread interesting
-
- KVRAF
- 4074 posts since 28 Apr, 2004
posh boy, my secondary DAW goes straight out into the garden.Kriminal wrote:my secondary DAW is the one from the conservatory to the kitchen
edit: i have a tertiary DAW in the shed though... does that count ?
-
christianmusicmaker christianmusicmaker https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=12152
- KVRAF
- 1670 posts since 1 Feb, 2004 from UK
The lack of a listing in the poll is no big deal franklyKriminal wrote:according to the polls, he's asking about DAW's, not hosts....dont think he actually knows what he is talking about...christianmusicmaker wrote:Two host polls and still no listing for P5.
DAW's and hosts are so similar these days anyway. You can just as easily complete a whole track midi and audio in P5 and do the same thing in Sonar. Nobody will be able to tell that you used Sonar while mixing, and prepared the midi files for the project in P5 or vice versa.
There is so much crossover with softstudios, DAW's and Hosts that frankly a host is a host pretty much.
Bundled FX, instruments, notation and how a host works seem to bring up these IMHO outdated categrories.
The term softstudio has been used by magazines to describe Reason(which I use)as everything you need to make music. But it cannot record audio. Misleading. You can sequence in Reason but it's not called a sequencer see what I mean? Outdated. I think music packages are so diverse as far as how they arrive at a finished song that there probably is no easy way to categorise them. But it is still fun to read about it all
-
- KVRist
- 263 posts since 24 Oct, 2004 from Delhi, India
There is also "other" option. Fish may lead too.Warmonger wrote:I predict eXT will clean up in this poll.
Tools are tools, they don't produce anything...
-
- KVRian
- 747 posts since 5 Sep, 2002 from Redondo Beach
-
- KVRian
- 747 posts since 5 Sep, 2002 from Redondo Beach
-
- KVRAF
- 4229 posts since 9 Apr, 2003 from Right here, in front of my computer...
I use Logic as a main DAW, and Live as a secondary thing, for its strengths and for the things that Live does really well and Logic doesnt. It's basically a completely different music making paradigm and that can be healthy as it gets you out of habits developed when working in one application.Guitarjeff wrote:What would you use a "secondary" DAW for?
If you can't do everything you need to in your main DAW, then you need a new main DAW.
Plus Live is a great Live toolkit and has all sorts of uses. In short, they completment each other perfectly. Live for inspiration, jamming, remixing, on-the-fly arrangements, loop and texture generating and so on, and Logic for detail work, convertional stuff, and editing and mixing the audio generated from Live.
-
- KVRAF
- 7489 posts since 6 Jul, 2004
Agreed. Softstudio is a silly term. Being pedantic, I think that Cubase/Sonar/Logic are more like complete studios in software anyway - Reason is a MIDI sequencer with a rack of instruments/effects.christianmusicmaker wrote: The term softstudio has been used by magazines to describe Reason(which I use)as everything you need to make music. But it cannot record audio. Misleading. You can sequence in Reason but it's not called a sequencer see what I mean? Outdated. I think music packages are so diverse as far as how they arrive at a finished song that there probably is no easy way to categorise them. But it is still fun to read about it all
I chose Reason in this poll though. Although the term DAW is a misleading one, the fact is that I use Reason rewired into my main host in almost every project I do (where software instruments are required). So clearly Reason is my secondary piece of software.
The irony though is that this is true whatever I happen to be using as my "Main host" at the time - so I might use Live + Reason, maybe Sonar + Reason, or sometimes I'll go for Audition + Reason.
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 5745 posts since 11 Feb, 2005 from Bordeaux France
D-Fusion wrote:Kriminal wrote:really why? are you running low on useless information?stanlea wrote:Thought it would be interesting to know...
Think a little...
You can't always get what you waaaant...
-
- KVRAF
- 6519 posts since 13 Mar, 2002 from UK



