Shows us Theory Newbies how to implement chords.

Chords, scales, harmony, melody, etc.
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Toxikator wrote:Euh. Mute. :roll:
Damn. Now who's going to pick up my mistakes.
Image
Now with improved MIDI jitter!

Post

Anyway, OP, back to your post, whether or not you DO analyze the IV as being from the melodic minor or borrowed from the Dorian depends on what you follow it with; will you be following with a minor v or a Major V? If it's the former, since you won't be employing the #7 (characteristic of the melodic minor) then it's going to be borrowed. If you follow it with a V, then it should be considered part of the melodic minor form (as it has the #7 leading tone). Which form you use would probably reflect how you played the melody over top of it; the melodic minor form would likely (not always) experience some sort of shift back to the natural minor (traditionally, it's melodic ascending and natural descending, but this is of course open to interpretation). If it's borrowed from the dorian (as in it's a temporary switch for the duration of that chord) it's more likely that the melody would simply avoid the n6, though of course the melody (and possibly, the entire piece) could just be in Dorian.
Image

Post

Got that?

Who says theory is dull and pointless.
Image
Now with improved MIDI jitter!

Post

nuffink wrote:
Toxikator wrote:Euh. Mute. :roll:
Damn. Now who's going to pick up my mistakes.
Jesus mate. WTF??? This pissing match between you two is getting rather trite.

As much as you might like to claim superiority in the theory dept, Toxikator's posts are often quite informative (even if a little long-winded most of the time).

Post

nuffink wrote:You should be very careful about taking advice from our little problem child. He likes to throw around words like "chromatic subdominant" because it makes it sound like he knows what he's talking about.
nuffink wrote:I'm sure toxi could define them in pure chromatic bullshit given enough time.
nuffink wrote:Is that the same textbook that leads you to make a fool of yourself with every post? I'd get a new one if I were you.
Come on nuffink, this is unnecessary. You've already got one topic full of your rants; do not degrade this one to the same level. In this case your comments are completely unfounded. You are not disagreeing with any specific statement, you are just hurling abuse. Although I'm not a moderator, in my book this constitutes a personal attack.
From the rules wrote:Members should post in a way that is respectful of other users. Flaming or abusing users in any way will not be tolerated and will result in your post being edited / deleted, and you may be issued with a warning and / or a ban.
I think an apology is in order.

Post

advaya wrote:
nuffink wrote:
Toxikator wrote:Euh. Mute. :roll:
Damn. Now who's going to pick up my mistakes.
Jesus mate. WTF??? This pissing match between you two is getting rather trite.

As much as you might like to claim superiority in the theory dept, Toxikator's posts are often quite informative (even if a little long-winded most of the time).
Long before a specific forum existed this place used to have a number of knowlegable folk who often posted on theory matters. Ever wonder what happened to them?

I don't. I've got a private messagebox loaded with pm's saying the same thing. They won't bother while toxi is shitting all over everything they post.

Toxi wanted a war, he's got it. The place needs fumigating and whether or not you like it, he's going.
Image
Now with improved MIDI jitter!

Post

JumpingJackFlash wrote:
nuffink wrote:You should be very careful about taking advice from our little problem child. He likes to throw around words like "chromatic subdominant" because it makes it sound like he knows what he's talking about.
nuffink wrote:I'm sure toxi could define them in pure chromatic bullshit given enough time.
nuffink wrote:Is that the same textbook that leads you to make a fool of yourself with every post? I'd get a new one if I were you.
Come on nuffink, this is unnecessary. You've already got one topic full of your rants; do not degrade this one to the same level. In this case your comments are completely unfounded. You are not disagreeing with any specific statement, you are just hurling abuse. Although I'm not a moderator, in my book this constitutes a personal attack.
From the rules wrote:Members should post in a way that is respectful of other users. Flaming or abusing users in any way will not be tolerated and will result in your post being edited / deleted, and you may be issued with a warning and / or a ban.
I think an apology is in order.
You need to be quiet for a while.
Image
Now with improved MIDI jitter!

Post

Oh, and by the way, advaya. Apparently this isn't the first forum he's shat all over. He's a serial offender.
Image
Now with improved MIDI jitter!

Post

Guybrush wrote:A little tip from me as a pianoplayer:

Making your chords and progressions sound nice is not only about having the right notes (harmonies, chords) but alot about in what order you play the notes in them. Say you want to write a progressions from C to F, beginners usually lay each chord in it's standard variation; C: c-e-g to F: f-a-c. When writing progressions (maybe mostly using a keyboard, pianoroll or something that works like the keys of a piano) the general rule of thumb is: The less motion the smoother sound. Skipping between different parts of your keyboard for your chords genrerally sounds noobish. With the C to F progression try playing your C chord with the (2nd) voicing e-g-c and so that you just need to move your thumb and middle finger to f and a while you keep your pinky at the c - since that note is in both chords (first the root note then the fifth).
Ever wondered how all those awsome jazzpianists make their progressions sound smooth? Just lay your chords with voicings that stay the closest possible togheter.
Thanks, Guybrush, that's a good point. Even in guitar based rock and roll, using inversions makes a difference. Try C - G/B - Am - G. Let the bass player pick up the B in the 2nd chord.

Post

JumpingJackFlash wrote:
From the rules wrote:Members should post in a way that is respectful of other users. Flaming or abusing users in any way will not be tolerated and will result in your post being edited / deleted, and you may be issued with a warning and / or a ban.
I think an apology is in order.
:hihi: Yeah, that'll happen.

Aw, let him have his fun. It's his very last little stretch as KvR's only resident theorist, don't take that away from him.
Image

Post

This is a lot to digest, and I admit that i've been all over the place lately with music and theory (trying to polish my playing technique, as well as learning other things) so tonight what I am going to do is brush up on chords (even went out and bought one of those books with every single chord in it, it has pictures of the scale/and pictures of someone's fingering position on the keys and all, pretty nice for 6 dollars!) and re-read this, and try to get it all in.
"You are going to let the fear of poverty govern your life and your reward will be that you will eat, but you will not live."

Post

Whoa, I thought this was Theory Newbie stuff.

Maybe if I stick to monophonic, I will have a valid excuse as to why this means nothing to me.

But I doubt it. I need to brush up on my theory, but this is obviosly not the place to start (especially when you have to filter your way through the space wasting bickering)

Post

@No name and Dayl, I wouldn't let the theory slow you down. Try some of the chord progressions and later dive into the theory. Post some other progressions you like even if you don't know the theory. After all, if it sounds good, it is good.

Post

chardin wrote:After all, if it sounds good, it is good.
The ultimate truth. :D

I'd be interested to hear a few of these new ones, too; I'm sure that I and the many other theory geeks would be mor than willing to take a crack at explaining the theory behind them.
Image

Post

chardin wrote:
Guybrush wrote:A little tip from me as a pianoplayer:

Making your chords and progressions sound nice is not only about having the right notes (harmonies, chords) but alot about in what order you play the notes in them. Say you want to write a progressions from C to F, beginners usually lay each chord in it's standard variation; C: c-e-g to F: f-a-c. When writing progressions (maybe mostly using a keyboard, pianoroll or something that works like the keys of a piano) the general rule of thumb is: The less motion the smoother sound. Skipping between different parts of your keyboard for your chords genrerally sounds noobish. With the C to F progression try playing your C chord with the (2nd) voicing e-g-c and so that you just need to move your thumb and middle finger to f and a while you keep your pinky at the c - since that note is in both chords (first the root note then the fifth).
Ever wondered how all those awsome jazzpianists make their progressions sound smooth? Just lay your chords with voicings that stay the closest possible togheter.
Thanks, Guybrush, that's a good point. Even in guitar based rock and roll, using inversions makes a difference. Try C - G/B - Am - G. Let the bass player pick up the B in the 2nd chord.
great tip!
my key skills are limited, but that made a big difference in a little practice

Post Reply

Return to “Music Theory”