Getting paid stealing somebody's else work?!?!

Chords, scales, harmony, melody, etc.
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

This kind of progression and piano melody would be pretty common Trance techniques...

Post

Omniphonix wrote:
rlahalla wrote:
Ogg Vorbis wrote:Correct. Al Gore invented triplet arpeggios.
No, Al Gore invented the internet. Fact.
http://www.snopes.com/quotes/internet.asp

Al Gore fostered legislation that further developed DARPAnet for educational use and then went on to open it up to commercial access.
"During my service in Coldplay, I took the initiative in creating the triplet arpeggio." A. Gore

By the way, if I gave my wife 20 dollars to go to the grocery store to foster further development in meals, can I say that I "took the intiative for creating dinner?" :P

Post

Pretty basic chord progression IMHO , but to go further if they had sampled Coldplay they would have just had to clear the samples with a sample clearance company or with a direct talk from labels to labels ..
Image
Organising a protest march this Friday Schlesische Strasse 28 ,10997 Berlin, Germany

Post

Coldplay are shit.

Post

"Good composers borrow; great composers steal."
-- attributed to Igor Stravinsky

I'm sure some non-great musicians do too, but my point is that copying is commonplace. There have been uproars in the past over it too. C'est la vie.

Post

Ogg Vorbis wrote:
By the way, if I gave my wife 20 dollars to go to the grocery store to foster further development in meals, can I say that I "took the intiative for creating dinner?" :P
sure, why not. Seems a perfectly reasonable thing to say :!:

Post

ecsmix wrote:I know chord progression doesn't have copyright, but what is this???



I know my ears suck, don;t have perfect pitch or anything, I don't even thing that went well with the vocal, can someone explain why this melody worked with this vocal?

Thanks.

P.S: It is a COLD way to Play the game of doing music.
OMG.. And Cold Play was accused for plagiarism on the Satriani song :hihi: What comes around goes around :P


Post

jancivil wrote:
Ogg Vorbis wrote:
By the way, if I gave my wife 20 dollars to go to the grocery store to foster further development in meals, can I say that I "took the intiative for creating dinner?" :P
sure, why not. Seems a perfectly reasonable thing to say :!:
You would SO call bullshit on me! :lol:

Post

eduardo_b wrote:Define someone else's work? You mean something so unique that it doesn't have any connection to anything done before by anyone else? No borrowing, not remaking, no interpretation?
I wonder how hard it will be to find that exact same pattern and progression, say, in the works of Haydn, Telemann or Villa-Lobos?

Post

that kelly roland song is painful to listen to.. man .. F*ck pop music..

Post

Reminds me of an interview of some screenwriter (forgot his name) who decided to keep a note pad by his bed to record all the great ideas he was having for scripts in his dreams.

He stopped doing it after his first amazing dream idea was documented by his note: "Boy meets girl."

Sorry kids, it's all been done before. Your best bet is to try and ignore it as much as possible and move along.
Zerocrossing Media

4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~

Post

ecsmix wrote:I know chord progression doesn't have copyright, but what is this???

This is you going so far out of your way to find something to be unhappy about, that you actually listen to the music in the link.

Seriously, if that is the length that you have to go to, count your blessings.

Post

Milly Vanilly is the BESTSts!!!

:P

Post

thecontrolcentre wrote:Coldplay are shit.
they aren't that good

Post

james0tucson wrote:
eduardo_b wrote:Define someone else's work? You mean something so unique that it doesn't have any connection to anything done before by anyone else? No borrowing, not remaking, no interpretation?
I wonder how hard it will be to find that exact same pattern and progression, say, in the works of Haydn, Telemann or Villa-Lobos?
It doesn't even have to be exact. The "sounds like" test is enough to send some people off on a tangent about stealing other people's work...as if the arts aren't built on reusing many elements from what came before (before being about 5 minutes ago or longer). What they don't get is that simply doing a different arrangement (now referred to as remixing) makes an artistic statement, which can have its own value even though it's done using someone else's s-called "original" work. Keeps IP lawyers in upper income brackets.
We escape the trap of our own subjectivity by
perceiving neither black nor white but shades of grey

Post Reply

Return to “Music Theory”