AIR Instrument Collection For $299

VST, AU, AAX, CLAP, etc. Plugin Virtual Instruments Discussion
RELATED
PRODUCTS
Vacuum Pro-70%$29.00Buy

Post

careyletendre wrote: Loom and Vacuum Pro are already VST/AU/RTAS/AAX and the rest will be released in the near future.
Carey
How "near" will that be? And will actual users be entitled to have the new versions for free? Did they commit to that?
Fernando (FMR)

Post

osiris wrote:Everyone talks about Pace, but can someone explain why it's so disliked, please?
I don't want to hijack the thread with yet another Pace/iLok debate so to be brief (and no rant)....I had a bad experience that cost me a lot of money and to this day they have not been able to provide a solution. So no more money from me going their direction.

Also, it runs in the background eating system resources. This may (or may not) be a problem for others but I need my system resources to go to my DAW.

osiris, you been here long enough to know the rants, erm...debates, about this subject. :hihi:

Apologies to OP for taking off track for a moment.

Happy Musiking!
dsan
My DAW System:
W7, i5, x64, 8Gb Ram, Edirol FA-101

Post

I know. I've seen people say : I installed Pace and nothing works right after, but Pace is the owners of the ILok, correct? At least the software side of it. I had UVI on another computer which used Pace and I didn't notice any problems. Still, I see where people get upset.

Post

Vacuum Pro is now 75% off, costing $50, 1000 licences are available.
Vacuum Pro guide wrote:Note: Vacuum Pro uses PACE copy protection, so
it will install the PACE InterLok driver on your system if you do not already have it. As most audio software uses PACE copy protection, though, this is probably already installed on your system.
:lol: That's one way of selling it :hihi:
Last edited by Numanoid on Thu Mar 13, 2014 4:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post

careyletendre wrote:However, I'm sad to see that they dropped the iLok protection in place of the Pace soft-license.
Does that mean it is quite easy to sell of licence second hand?

Image

https://www.ilok.com/ilm.html;jsessioni ... f038760518

Post

Hey Numanoid
Do you sell it again the Vacuum Pro or do you have bought it?
Synth Anatomy
http://www.synthanatomy.com
Sound Design and Software / IOS Synthesizer Videochannel

Post

MillerSam wrote:Do you sell it again the Vacuum Pro or do you have bought it?
I would be interested in buying it for just $50, if I knew that if I got tired of it I could at a later point transfer and sell the licence to somebody else

Post

same idea here ;)

But it's interesting for the future for buying the complete bundle with loom at 149,99 Dollar Upgrade
Synth Anatomy
http://www.synthanatomy.com
Sound Design and Software / IOS Synthesizer Videochannel

Post

MillerSam wrote:same idea here ;)

But it's interesting for the future for buying the complete bundle with loom at 149,99 Dollar Upgrade
Yes, that would be $50 + $150 = $200

Saving $100 on the full package :)

Post

I don't know, purchase or not purchase
Synth Anatomy
http://www.synthanatomy.com
Sound Design and Software / IOS Synthesizer Videochannel

Post

For the price, Retrologue is maybe a better option for analogish style synth plug, and that licence I know one can deregister and sell second-hand

Post

Nope , Retrologue is on e-licenser and you need a second for the transfer
Synth Anatomy
http://www.synthanatomy.com
Sound Design and Software / IOS Synthesizer Videochannel

Post

MillerSam wrote:Nope , Retrologue is on e-licenser and you need a second for the transfer
No, you do not need the physical dongle to run Retrologue, the soft e-licenser is enough.

So the licence can be deregistered from the soft e-licenser and sold second hand

Post

osiris wrote:Everyone talks about Pace, but can someone explain why it's so disliked, please?
First, Pace has a long history of being a sh*t company in many ways. Also historically the Pace CP system has been among the worst crap like Sony rootkit, Macrovison and other horrible things that could mess up your computer, cause instabilities and compatibility problems. Sure, they have improved but even as recently as couple of months ago there were problems where some Pace stuff caused some Tone2 stuff not to work. And not to mention the big downtime from the last year.

Second, it's the overall logic that bothers me even more - basically the fundamental idea of Pace iLok is to put all the CP expenses on the paying users. You have to pay for your precious iLok extra money out of your own pocket. If your precious iLok brakes you are in for a lot of grief and have to suffer additional losses in both time and money trying to resolve the matter, and no developer nor Pace will give a flying F. What is more insulting is that they see nothing wrong in asking you even more money for their "downtime protection" that lets you use your paid for software if something with their CP brakes. What a joke! And all those outrageous license transfer fees... Pace is basically a extra punishment for paying customers.

Third, it takes control over your paid software out of your hands and ties it to arbitrary external factors. So it's an external non-core function of your software that in the case of not functioning makes your software non-functional in full. I know that many people do not encounter any problems, and good for them, but during my work I've seen plenty. Why do they sell you their "insurance" in the first place?

Dealing with CP sh*t in general is rapidly becoming a full-time chore and these practices should not be encouraged. Pace is a remnant of the old times where good software was rare and expensive. Fortunately this is not the case anymore and there are plenty of choice beside Pace-locked software.
No signature here!

Post

robotmonkey wrote:Pace is a remnant of the old times...
Complaining about Pace and providing disinformation about it is a 'remnant of the old times'.

Post Reply

Return to “Instruments”