Sounds to me like Bitcrusher got the first one right, although I'd say it would probably be a bit easier to get levels right if you put the reverb on its own return channels, or if you can't do that, then a group channel(s) with the verb as insert 100% wet. It's just easier to control if you can tweak channels rather than return levels and wet/dry mixes.
Of course the other way (a bit more tedious) is to actually render a reverb to audio and run it as an audio channel - I do that with things like dub etc when you want to be able to do lots of things with FX and their levels. And it means you can cut and paste for some more complicated FX shenanigins. So you can suddenly flip the reverb over to reverse etc instead of having another FX using CPU.
How to...FX related...
-
- KVRAF
- 2356 posts since 30 Sep, 2003 from Sunny Staffordshire
FX1, dont forget the kick triggered side-chain compression. That effect has become really popular lately, but it works great!
FX2, sounds like a phaser to me.
FX2, sounds like a phaser to me.
-
- KVRist
- 261 posts since 24 Jul, 2002 from Tennessee
FX1 sounds like bandpass filtered saw-bass fed to a reverb with a large pre-delay.
FX2 sounds to me like a deep flange effect following by a chorus. The Boss stomp-box flanger and chorus combo can sound like that.
FX2 sounds to me like a deep flange effect following by a chorus. The Boss stomp-box flanger and chorus combo can sound like that.
-
- Banned
- 1648 posts since 11 Sep, 2005
Ever had one of those days where nothing was working out right and you just had to piss somebody off because otherwise you'd burst?
I figured the least damaging thing I could do is revive a thread from May 2004, but still piss people off.
Come on, get pissed! Yell at me! Argh!
I figured the least damaging thing I could do is revive a thread from May 2004, but still piss people off.
Come on, get pissed! Yell at me! Argh!
