Blue Cat's?
Since it exposes the transfer function, then why isn't it similar to Trash?
Blue Cat's?
Probably one of the machine learning plugins, trained with studio gear. For example, I captured a distorting Moog filter pedal with tonex and that for me is the gold standard of distortion for synths.soundmodel wrote: Sat Mar 30, 2024 4:03 pm I wonder what the gold standards of digital distortions for any material are. For reference.
Well cutting most of the low end and some of the very high-end makes all of the "complex transfer function" algorithms less harsh, but they stil sound bad, because the transfer function gives a sort of "cardboard" sound. They're just not good waves or then the way they're mixed into the input waveform sucks.soundmodel wrote: Sat Mar 30, 2024 4:23 pm Maybe the Trash type algos would work better in multiband use? E.g. applied only higher frequencies? Or mid?
Because... *drumroll* ... plugins sound different.soundmodel wrote: Sat Mar 30, 2024 4:53 pm Okay why does Waves Berserk sound smooth and not harsh, even when it has these "wow complex transfer functions"? There's none of that harshness of the Trash module.
I wanted to know the possible technical reason. After being surprised that the Trash module seems to suck even when iZotope in general is very knowledgeable developer.chk071 wrote: Sat Mar 30, 2024 5:00 pmBecause... *drumroll* ... plugins sound different.soundmodel wrote: Sat Mar 30, 2024 4:53 pm Okay why does Waves Berserk sound smooth and not harsh, even when it has these "wow complex transfer functions"? There's none of that harshness of the Trash module.
I just hope that no developer enters the discussion, and bores you with incomprehensible technical explanations.soundmodel wrote: Sat Mar 30, 2024 5:01 pmI wanted to know the possible technical reason.chk071 wrote: Sat Mar 30, 2024 5:00 pmBecause... *drumroll* ... plugins sound different.soundmodel wrote: Sat Mar 30, 2024 4:53 pm Okay why does Waves Berserk sound smooth and not harsh, even when it has these "wow complex transfer functions"? There's none of that harshness of the Trash module.
Maybe it's a (sort of) orchestration/sound design issue? I love Trash (both 1 and 2), but for me, it tends to be quite niche, i.e., drums and percussion. I'd never get near, say, a guitar with them, except, perhaps in some sort of quasi-industrial setting (?). I say this last with some hesitation as I am being totally speculative here and haven't had to try it.soundmodel wrote: Fri Mar 29, 2024 5:03 pm I've mostly used just Trash 2's presets, but today I shut down everything else and simply tried the Trash module.
I think all of the other settings there sounded pretty bad except for those that happened to have quite clean (e.g. a half-sine) transfer curve.
So to me all the other "wow what a complex curve" were just pointless.
Why bother then?
Could be an analog-digital thing too. The digital distortions just sound bad, when the equivalent thing as analog electronics would sound lively and smooth.
I'm testing Tube Drainer right now. It sounds pretty good to me. Here are the settings I'm using. I set the mid frequency high so that the tilt EQ is functioning more as a low pass filter. Trash Lite:soundmodel wrote: Sat Mar 30, 2024 4:36 pm But I don't understand why things like "Tube Drainer" also sound bad.
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026