Maybe it only seemed like that because you were hallucinating.cryophonik wrote: Thu May 21, 2026 6:24 pmHmmmm, I'm not so sure about that. I ate some bad gas station sushi once and my GI tract made at least 4 billion sounds in about 3 hours.zerocrossing wrote: Thu May 21, 2026 3:03 am If you spent a second on each sound it would take you 133 years of nonstop auditioning to hear them all.
4.2 BILLION SOUNDS
- KVRAF
- 18470 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
- KVRAF
- 18470 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
I haven’t even finished the presets of the synthesizers I already have!ThoughtExperiment wrote: Thu May 21, 2026 9:54 pmBest get started thenzerocrossing wrote: Thu May 21, 2026 3:03 am If you spent a second on each sound it would take you 133 years of nonstop auditioning to hear them all.![]()
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
-
- KVRian
- 1048 posts since 6 Nov, 2010
Just to be that ass: how many sounds can you get out of an average 2 osc subtractive synth?
What lies behind us and what lies before us are small matters compared to what lies within us. - Emerson
-
- KVRAF
- 16793 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
Three or four.Cuauhtli wrote: Fri May 22, 2026 2:15 am Just to be that ass: how many sounds can you get out of an average 2 osc subtractive synth?
- KVRAF
- 20858 posts since 22 Nov, 2000 from Southern California
Every single sound in that video was bad.
- KVRAF
- 13871 posts since 19 Jun, 2008 from Seattle
Yeeeah, I didn't experience any 'wow' moments either, and certainly wouldn't proclaim what I heard as "inspiring", but I think there is a potential market for a hardware one-button-press four channel MIDI randomization feature alone.
Notwithstanding, $149.00 for all of the following is pretty reasonable, and the price of those I suspect will soon follow on the second hand market will be even more reasonable, for those who are accustomed to mindlessly playing with their food.
- 8 synthesis engines: subtractive, fm, acid, noise, speech, karplus-strong, supersaw, additive
4 simultaneous instruments per patch, individually mixable
4 simultaneous euclidean sequences, playable over MIDI (see below)
20 scales
5 filter types
4-track audio output over usb-c (one track per instrument, pre-reverb)
4-channel MIDI in: play RND synth with keyboards or sequencers (usb-c + trs mini jack)
4-channel MIDI out: send 4 random sequences to other instruments (usb-c)
9 MIDI modes: see below.
MIDI clock in (usb-c + trs mini jack) and out (usb-c)
analog sync in and out (2 ts mini jack)
stereo mix out (trs mini jack / post-reverb)
I'm not a musician, but I've designed sounds that others use to make music. http://soundcloud.com/obsidiananvil
-
- DASH Guy
- 8157 posts since 20 Sep, 2001
-
- KVRian
- 869 posts since 30 May, 2019
That was always the worst thing about Autogun.bermudagold wrote: Thu May 21, 2026 5:39 pmlol...that's what people said in the comments...also this...memba berries
https://www.kvraudio.com/product/the-el ... ise-by-ugo
Hence the need for it's bigger and better brother Ogun.
- Beware the Quoth
- 35496 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
Im curious about the definition of 'sounds' here, given that my brain seems to think that having 8 parameters with a value range of 0-15 per parameter gives you 4.2 billion possible settings.
(https://coolconversion.com/math/exponen ... ower-of_8_)
(https://coolconversion.com/math/exponen ... ower-of_8_)
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1030 posts since 15 Feb, 2005
yeah was kinda surprised by the reception...its surprisingly robust and well thought out concept both functionally and as art, for by todays standard relatively low price...add another usb port for an external drive and another raspberry pie to analyze the sample drive according to some small set of metrics and apply some small set of heuristics to steer the randomization and sequencing in highest probability musical directions...and they may be onto somethingShabdahbriah wrote: Fri May 22, 2026 9:08 amYeeeah, I didn't experience any 'wow' moments either, and certainly wouldn't proclaim what I heard as "inspiring", but I think there is a potential market for a hardware one-button-press four channel MIDI randomization feature alone.
Notwithstanding, $149.00 for all of the following is pretty reasonable,
Music had a one night stand with sound design.....And the condom broke
- KVRAF
- 11336 posts since 18 Aug, 2007 from NYC
Of course someone will like it. I’ve already seen some excited by it on another forum.
Having needed to interact with a number of AI music tools that essentially do the same thing, I can’t say this seems fun. The whole push/click receive result and repeat until you find something enjoyable is 100% not enjoyable to me at least.
Clearly there’s a market for it and the “hey look at what I did” crowd is ready to showcase anything resembling good/passable for 15 seconds. It makes sense why this can exist.
Yeah, I’m not jaded at all.
I’m pretty sure I have more than 4.2 billion options every time I choose to play. From my short and recent experience with one click options, it takes longer to find something decent than just playing and shaping along the way.
Having needed to interact with a number of AI music tools that essentially do the same thing, I can’t say this seems fun. The whole push/click receive result and repeat until you find something enjoyable is 100% not enjoyable to me at least.
Clearly there’s a market for it and the “hey look at what I did” crowd is ready to showcase anything resembling good/passable for 15 seconds. It makes sense why this can exist.
Yeah, I’m not jaded at all.
I’m pretty sure I have more than 4.2 billion options every time I choose to play. From my short and recent experience with one click options, it takes longer to find something decent than just playing and shaping along the way.
- KVRAF
- 20858 posts since 22 Nov, 2000 from Southern California
You're right, and I actually like the concept, I just can't understand how every sound in the video was so bad.Shabdahbriah wrote: Fri May 22, 2026 9:08 am Yeeeah, I didn't experience any 'wow' moments either, and certainly wouldn't proclaim what I heard as "inspiring", but I think there is a potential market for a hardware one-button-press four channel MIDI randomization feature alone.
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1030 posts since 15 Feb, 2005
sure...i prefer deterministic workflows to stochastic ones...but if you go by kvr threads, people are constantly looking to be inspired by stochastic processes...its the most requested feature...people don't realize how much they can increase time waste and ear fatigue...but they are entertainment...same reason people can sit in vegas in front of slot machines all dayelxsound wrote: Fri May 22, 2026 4:54 pm Of course someone will like it. I’ve already seen some excited by it on another forum.
Having needed to interact with a number of AI music tools that essentially do the same thing, I can’t say this seems fun. The whole push/click receive result and repeat until you find something enjoyable is 100% not enjoyable to me at least.
Clearly there’s a market for it and the “hey look at what I did” crowd is ready to showcase anything resembling good/passable for 15 seconds. It makes sense why this can exist.
Yeah, I’m not jaded at all.![]()
I’m pretty sure I have more than 4.2 billion options every time I choose to play. From my short and recent experience with one click options, it takes longer to find something decent than just playing and shaping along the way.
Music had a one night stand with sound design.....And the condom broke
- KVRAF
- 11336 posts since 18 Aug, 2007 from NYC
Yeah… There’s some reaching. How is it “the most requested feature?”bermudagold wrote: Fri May 22, 2026 6:01 pmsure...i prefer deterministic workflows to stochastic ones...but if you go by kvr threads, people are constantly looking to be inspired by stochastic processes...its the most requested feature...people don't realize how much they can increase time waste and ear fatigue...but they are entertainment...same reason people can sit in vegas in front of slot machines all dayelxsound wrote: Fri May 22, 2026 4:54 pm Of course someone will like it. I’ve already seen some excited by it on another forum.
Having needed to interact with a number of AI music tools that essentially do the same thing, I can’t say this seems fun. The whole push/click receive result and repeat until you find something enjoyable is 100% not enjoyable to me at least.
Clearly there’s a market for it and the “hey look at what I did” crowd is ready to showcase anything resembling good/passable for 15 seconds. It makes sense why this can exist.
Yeah, I’m not jaded at all.![]()
I’m pretty sure I have more than 4.2 billion options every time I choose to play. From my short and recent experience with one click options, it takes longer to find something decent than just playing and shaping along the way.
Anyway, I called this a novelty device earlier it so seems we’re in agreement to some degree.
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1030 posts since 15 Feb, 2005
far from reaching...every new plug thread before it reaches second page is someone asking for a random button...look at the popularity of plugins promoting non deterministic happy accident workflows...no hyperbole from me...lots of hardware could be considered novelty devices at this point...cause they all have more powerful comparable products in softwareelxsound wrote: Fri May 22, 2026 6:38 pmYeah… There’s some reaching. How is it “the most requested feature?”bermudagold wrote: Fri May 22, 2026 6:01 pmsure...i prefer deterministic workflows to stochastic ones...but if you go by kvr threads, people are constantly looking to be inspired by stochastic processes...its the most requested feature...people don't realize how much they can increase time waste and ear fatigue...but they are entertainment...same reason people can sit in vegas in front of slot machines all dayelxsound wrote: Fri May 22, 2026 4:54 pm Of course someone will like it. I’ve already seen some excited by it on another forum.
Having needed to interact with a number of AI music tools that essentially do the same thing, I can’t say this seems fun. The whole push/click receive result and repeat until you find something enjoyable is 100% not enjoyable to me at least.
Clearly there’s a market for it and the “hey look at what I did” crowd is ready to showcase anything resembling good/passable for 15 seconds. It makes sense why this can exist.
Yeah, I’m not jaded at all.![]()
I’m pretty sure I have more than 4.2 billion options every time I choose to play. From my short and recent experience with one click options, it takes longer to find something decent than just playing and shaping along the way.
Anyway, I called this a novelty device earlier it so seems we’re in agreement to some degree.
Music had a one night stand with sound design.....And the condom broke