two different monsters , two neo-distinctive soundscape possibillities ....
Nuendo is the OFFICIAL ProTools Killer, hint !!!
;;; but for instictive functionality CakeWalk was the first PRO tOOLs. {History ... remember ?, maybe not}
-new generation is O.K. with me.
Nuendo vs Sonar again
-
- KVRian
- 1283 posts since 13 Nov, 2004
They both suck, and although nuendo is 20 to 40 percent better audio engine, it is 3 times the price.slovak wrote:two different monsters , two neo-distinctive soundscape possibillities ....
Nuendo is the OFFICIAL ProTools Killer, hint !!!
;;; but for instictive functionality CakeWalk was the first PRO tOOLs. {History ... remember ?, maybe not}
-new generation is O.K. with me.
Tracktion is free, btw
-
- KVRist
- 189 posts since 29 Jan, 2003 from location, location, location...
Actually the surround support in Sonar4 is arguably more "true" than in Nuendo. Read the latest review in Mix: it appears the reveiwer claims Sonar4 is the the best choice for surround work currently available.UltraJv wrote:Nuendo is a high end audio application, it has true surround sound capability. Most people use it instead of protools. Yes it has multitracking, 64 bit broadcast wav format and many options geared towards the film industry. I prefer Nuendo over Cubase as I use adobe premiere. I prefer Cubase AND Nunedo over Sonar.
Last edited by LoRez on Fri Jan 07, 2005 2:45 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 42 posts since 26 Oct, 2004
i meant professional as in Sonar being more user friendly, i dont know why i see it in that kind of way, ima try it out cracked nd see if i like the new 1, then well see about which to buy. ive used tracktion, its not bad. keep coming at me with opinions, nuendo is catchin up on the polls.
-
- KVRist
- 189 posts since 29 Jan, 2003 from location, location, location...
"More pro" definitely depends on what aspects you are talking about. Depending on the feature I could argue the case for Nuendo being more pro OR Sonar being more "pro".SickNick2020 wrote:funny comparison with Ultra and Eric they both sound like they do the same lol. keep coming at the opinions i think nuendo is a bit more professional that sonar, baisically i think all of steinberg's products are very good i cant doubt any of them.
Last edited by LoRez on Fri Jan 07, 2005 2:39 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- KVRist
- 189 posts since 29 Jan, 2003 from location, location, location...
Maybe you should try the demo rather than crack...SickNick2020 wrote:i meant professional as in Sonar being more user friendly, i dont know why i see it in that kind of way, ima try it out cracked nd see if i like the new 1, then well see about which to buy. ive used tracktion, its not bad. keep coming at me with opinions, nuendo is catchin up on the polls.
Last edited by LoRez on Fri Jan 07, 2005 8:36 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- KVRist
- 189 posts since 29 Jan, 2003 from location, location, location...
Good points Rabbit. I too have a wide range of plugs and to be honest I get as good of compatibility, if not better, with more instruments and plugins in Sonar than I did in SX/Nuendo. This "not native VST host" is such a BS red-herring and I never hear anyone actually offer any concrete experience where they've had issues. All I hear is "oh well when I TRIED Sonar I had this one plug that I think maybe didn't work quite right..." Whatever.whyterabbyt wrote:maxxxter quoth And it's a REAL vst host. No compatibility issues.
I currently have 264 different plugins available to Sonar, from a very wide spectrum of developers. With no compatibility problems. I have used and tested hundreds more.
The one developer who's plugins consistently give problems in other hosts, including Sonar? Steinberg.
Funny that; can't even stick to their own standard. Not a good sign.
What was that about compatibility again?
-
- KVRian
- 1283 posts since 13 Nov, 2004
ooooooooooo, a fight opportunity..............Audioflux1 wrote:Nuendo/Cubase own Sonar's a$$!
... my dad can beat up your dad...
I'ma tellin' ya..........tracktion for free and it doesn't crash every three bars...........
-
- KVRian
- 954 posts since 15 Dec, 2000 from NY,NY,USA
No such thing.Vst has to wrapped even in Cubase/Nuendo to even work in a Windows based host.The disadvantage of Cubase/Nuendo is the built in wrapper can't be updated until the program itself is updated.If I had a nickel for everytime Nuendo wouldn't open because of a compatibility issue due to a certain VST plug....................maxxxter wrote:it's a REAL vst host. No compatibility issues.
-
- KVRian
- 954 posts since 15 Dec, 2000 from NY,NY,USA
I thinks it's sane to not want corrupted project files and the program to open at all times and burdensome dongles and flawed code that results in crashes.I said goodbye to Nuendo after 1.6.2 and sometimes visit the forums stil,but still see a lot of the same complaints to problems(clicking crossfades etc.)I haven't experienced in a long time plus new ones.Hopefully support will actually materialize once Yamaha is in place,but I wouldn't bet on it or even care anymore.Those problems aren't mine anymore.kaufi wrote:Sonar over Nuendo (or Cubase) *LoL*
Are you sanely???
-
- KVRist
- 68 posts since 21 Oct, 2003
I have been running Nuendo 2.2 for several months but it's bugloaded. Even when writing automation on the FM7 makes Nuendo lock up. Rewire2 issues. I gave up using it and that makes me a bit sad. It costs a lot of money.
I am a Sonar 2.2XL user and am considering to move to version 4.
I am a Sonar 2.2XL user and am considering to move to version 4.
Kind regards,
Marco Raaphorst
[composer/sound designer]
_____________________________________________________
Melodiefabriek - http://melodiefabriek.nl/
Marco Raaphorst
[composer/sound designer]
_____________________________________________________
Melodiefabriek - http://melodiefabriek.nl/
-
- KVRer
- 1 posts since 27 Feb, 2004
best joke this thread will have.eyeknow666 wrote:nuendo is 20 to 40 percent better audio engine
sonar wins, even though depending on the pan law nuendo might be 3dB louder on tracks panned to the center.