Best quality time-stretch
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRist
- 443 posts since 12 Feb, 2004
Hi ttoz....when I posted I was going to mention that for the bucks it's a really good buy,I'm glad you mentioned it...what interested me most about it though was the kind of simplistic re grooving that you can do with it.
You can get some quite nice reworked beats out of it with the swing functions with the right material,something I have not come accross before.
But it is so easy,quick and clean to just mess about with.It's a lot of fun if you are so inclined with the extreme.
To these ears as well I quite liked how it still managed to keep the sound reasonably cohesive without flattening all the transients and screwing with the spatialization...not bad at all and handy for still being able to use material with more rediculous stretches.
Nice to see a new player in the market at a very affordable price point and pretty good all round...definately one to watch as it develops further.After demoing for a while I did buy it and very pleased.
You can get some quite nice reworked beats out of it with the swing functions with the right material,something I have not come accross before.
But it is so easy,quick and clean to just mess about with.It's a lot of fun if you are so inclined with the extreme.
To these ears as well I quite liked how it still managed to keep the sound reasonably cohesive without flattening all the transients and screwing with the spatialization...not bad at all and handy for still being able to use material with more rediculous stretches.
Nice to see a new player in the market at a very affordable price point and pretty good all round...definately one to watch as it develops further.After demoing for a while I did buy it and very pleased.
01001001 01110100 00100111 01110011 00100000 01100011 01100001 01101100 01101100 01100101 01100100 00100000 00100010 01000100 01100001 01101001 01110011 01111001 00101110 00100010
-
- KVRAF
- 1703 posts since 19 Apr, 2003 from Copenhagen, Denmark
Melodyne is not for polyphonic sounds by the way...
-
- KVRAF
- 1743 posts since 3 Dec, 2004
No fans of Adobe Auditions built in time-stretch/pitchshifting algorithms?
They constantly amaze me.
I actually had to implement a stretch/pitch in a dsp once and it kept ticking me off how much better Cool edits (at the time) was!!
They constantly amaze me.
I actually had to implement a stretch/pitch in a dsp once and it kept ticking me off how much better Cool edits (at the time) was!!
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRist
- 115 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from Kiev, Ukraine
Yeah that one good. pity that range only one octave
-
- KVRAF
- 1743 posts since 3 Dec, 2004
Its shit for this reason? Im talking about the fact that the algorithm introduces very little artifacts, not the interface...I never thought percentages were that difficult anyway for the simple effect.ttoz wrote:no. it's shit, one of the weaker aspects of audition.and there is no "before and after" tempo setting! how friggin annoying!
Have you used loop based tempo changes? These do in fact stretch on tempo....
Last edited by birrbits on Fri Feb 04, 2005 3:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRAF
- 1743 posts since 3 Dec, 2004
I will have to trust your experience with these other plugs, could you tell me roughly why they are so much better? (other than its shit...)ttoz wrote:no, it's shit because it sounds shit on TOP of that feature lack.
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRist
- 401 posts since 4 May, 2004
MPEX ones sound best to me (I've heard TimeFactory and the one in SX 2). They sound a lot less flangy and more natural than Elastique in FL and the one in Audition. I haven't heard Melodyne nor Waves, tho. Acid sounds fairly decent as well, with appropriate input, that is (undynamic, pad-like stuff gets somewhat flangy).