MIDI Controller testing

Anything about MUSIC but doesn't fit into the forums above.
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Sickle666 quoth Ok, so why then do some clearly perform better than others?

Sampling rate of the ADC the pot is connected to, probably...
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."

Post

The weird thing about my Radium is that the sampling rate isn't consistent (well, data entry and mod wheel excepted). On average, it's roughly 10 samples/sec, but occasionally (meaning about once every second) there are two samples only 20ms from each other.

Movies running at 30fps isn't exactly a great analogy because the inherently recorded motion blur. Current games are a better comparison, and 30 is pretty much the minimum required for smooth gameplay.

Anyway, if this is only a problem with Radiums, then there's no problem. But I'm interested in an Ozonic, so I'd love to see for myself that it is smooth enough.
Image

Post

It has to do with things like the sampling rate and the A to D convertor. A higher sampling rate will give smoother changes, and over-sampling at 12 or 16 bits and converting to 8 bits for MIDI would result in better 'resolution', too.

{Edit} Geez - I go out for an hour and someone beats me to the answer...

Post

Sickle666 wrote: You have three basic grades of electronics; commercial, industrial, and military..
I always thought that the industrial grade was more advanced than military...who develops the military grade stuff? Isn't it the industry?

Post

Dunno, but that's the order of quality as I always understood it.

Post

Warmonger, ftp is not working with Firefox or even SmartFTP, says it can't find the file MIDItest.trkarch.

Post

I may be misreading bradkvr's post, but I'm not so sure that all pots are made equal... I may be wrong about this, but when I took a cheap joystick apart to make my pedal board, I replaced the joystick's pots with some new ones I'd bought from maplin. It came as a bit of a shock to find that the new pots had significantly less resolution (this probably isn't the right term - I mean less resolution from the software side of things - the o/p value jumps in big steps) than the original joystick ones. This is with the same circuitry, so the same sampling rate is being used.

What I reckon made the difference is that the new pots were lower quality, and therefore they weren't lubricated(?) as well (they're certainly more stiff to turn than the original ones), with the result being that when you turn them, the resistance only changes in big steps.

Of course, I've no idea if this applies to midi controllers... I'd have thought that they'd use components of at least the same quality as those in a £15 joystick...

- Niall.

Post Reply

Return to “Everything Else (Music related)”