You're points are well taken, Bones. I'm very glad you are contributing to this discussion! I have similar viewpoints and what you spoke of is basically the reason I don't care for Ableton Live. But I can certianly see why those who are more into DJing or loop-arranging consider Live to be a formidable tool.
I myself do use sequenced material (I've written from scratch) as a backing track element. I have always been moving toward a more improvised performance.
But this has been a natural progession for me. I started out triggering longer sequences, basically songs, and playing keyboard leads over the top. Later I progressed into chopping up the relevant parts of those longer sequences and started triggering them improvisationaly and mixing elements from the entire pool. Now each performance was never exactly the same. And so naturally I am moving more toward the smaller and smaller elements to further expand the pallette of possible outcomes. I also am having a lot of fun with arpeggiation as a new tool to spark off of.
Anyway...
I would only like to politely suggest that we don't get into too much philisophical discussions about performance *ethics*, but rather the **technical** aspects of using Energy XT in a live setting.
For what it is worth, I know of many very respectable artists using long presequenced movements and still rock the house.
I would imagine the relevant audience of this thread to be:
- IDM or "LivePA" artists
- Keyboardists who need a virtual rack
- Keyboardists who need background sequencing
- DJs
Oh and btw, if interest warrants it, we may create a dedicated forum for this discussion as I can already see some fragments breaking off.
