I do as well, but with VintageVerb. You should try this stress test. If you follow the link in the description, you can download the original files, and the example files. I downloaded the Lexicon file, plus the original and tested VintageVerb with it, and it pretty much beats the Lexicon test with all of VVV's algorithms.Aroused by JarJar wrote:I prefer Valhalla Room to the PCMs. Bounce a wet track and shelf the bass a bit then mix with the dry original.Frantz wrote:I bought Reason when Thor first came out. It was my first attempt to move from hardware to ITB. I was immediately struck by how bad the Reason reverb was compared to my Lexicon PCM 81. Reason reverb sounded gritty and cheap in comparison. I abandoned Reason after messing around for a few weeks because of the reverb and being underwhelmed by Thor.
I now work almost exclusively ITB. I am using Valhalla Room for reverb. I don't bother patching in the Lexicon hardware. The Valhalla stuff is good enough and more convenient when you're ITB.
I think reverb is the perfect example why the original closed Reason model didn't work. The Valhalla guy is a reverb maniac and has spent years coding nothing but reverb algorithms. No one on the Props team was as experienced or interested in reverb. Their reverb was inferior to both Valhalla and Lexicon.
You would find the same thing if you compared all the virtual analogs plugins available (Diva, TAL, Monark, Arturia SEM, etc.) to Thor. The world of standard format plugins has a deeper developer talent pool than the Propellerheads team. They finally recognized this by adding Rack Extensions but I think it's too late. The world has moved on.
Besides this, to keep inline with the thread's subject, Ever since Record and Reason were merged, Reason's sound quality is pretty damn good. I loved the sound of Record and at the time before console emulation plugins were out, was seriously considering it as an option to mix in. I think this track is a great example. It was one of the Record song demos at the time.
