KVR Audio

kinwie · Post by **kinwie** » Mon Sep 30, 2013 7:49 pm

octopuss wrote:Sorry, but I can't agree with you.
I've used cracked

wowww...

anyway...i don't yet own any u-he plugs...just because there's no pro tools version for windows...glad now that it will be!

well, maybe it just an excuse because my latest purchase is xlutop's chainer, a 2003 product and VST only

just for the need to host those 'damn-great' synthedit free vsti

i just know, one day u-he will jump in to pro tools arena

kinwie · Post by **kinwie** » Mon Sep 30, 2013 8:03 pm

Tricky-Loops wrote:I rather trust a demo version directly from the developer than some Team AiR pirates!

in pro tools...AIR team is the major developer for PT's instrument plugins

funny they choose the same team name...hahaha

VitaminD · Post by **VitaminD** » Mon Sep 30, 2013 8:04 pm

How did a beta version end up in the hands of a software pirate?

Do you watermark in some fashion to find the mutineer? If not have you considered it for the future?

Ameyah Audio · Post by **Ameyah Audio** » Mon Sep 30, 2013 9:32 pm

VitaminD wrote:How did a beta version end up in the hands of a software pirate?

Do you watermark in some fashion to find the mutineer? If not have you considered it for the future?

uhe is posting beta versions in their subforum here at kvraudio.
so its nothing serious and to worry about.

wasnt to hyped on satin, but that wow/flanger effect is awesome. wish i could offer it. still busy to save money for a field recorder.

Delfinoverde · Post by **Delfinoverde** » Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:02 am

octopuss wrote:It doesn't matter if you have a protection to "work" in a "special day". The crackers always find a way to bypass the protection.

Personally, I like to try a VST without any limit of time or noises.
I understand that U-he can't afford to make that, and you (U-he) also give some nice freeware for those that can't afford to buy your software, as I already stated.

Warez is wrong, and people that constantly use it are only supporting those crackers instead of the developers that spend a lot of time and energy to create those things that some people take it for granted!!!!

Come on gentleman, nearly every informed citizen knows that even big recording studios use cracked copies of software. Why? Because they keep them under their desks in cases of loss of the original paid versions (=hassling protections).

ariston wrote: octopuss, it still sounds fishy, no matter how you phrase it. Using a crack to "test software" is still using a crack.

It depends on how good the crack is done!
Why not testing a demo-version first? The best software I bought was based on my experiences made with demos. What I really liked was Native Instruments very generous approach. They let you use their instruments full, with the only limitation of a 30 minutes usage time. That was splendid, so then i decided to buy the package! And I'm still convinced that it's the best way to let people test software.

Cracks in figures