but there is one entry violating Rule 1 Article c Sub i, and three of them violate Rule 1 Article c Sub ii (which at least claims to be very strict)august contest - GOSSIP
-
- KVRAF
- 8388 posts since 18 Apr, 2004
Dunno how strict Teh Rulez are but there is one entry violating Rule 1 Article c Sub i, and three of them violate Rule 1 Article c Sub ii (which at least claims to be very strict)
but there is one entry violating Rule 1 Article c Sub i, and three of them violate Rule 1 Article c Sub ii (which at least claims to be very strict)
-
- The Teach
- Topic Starter
- 8273 posts since 23 Jul, 2002 from flatness
i am aware of these transgressions ...farlukar wrote:Dunno how strict Teh Rulez are
slainte
rob
-
- KVRAF
- 2093 posts since 19 Jun, 2003 from UTM 18 317254E 4295335N (WGS84/NAD83)
I don't know if those rules are really enforced!farlukar wrote:Dunno how strict Teh Rulez are
-
- The Teach
- Topic Starter
- 8273 posts since 23 Jul, 2002 from flatness
hmmmnnn ...You™ wrote:I don't know if those rules are really enforced!
... the cant-be-arsed-to-tag thing is REALLY starting to bug me though ...
slainte
rob
-
- KVRAF
- 8388 posts since 18 Apr, 2004
Well personally I don't care if a file is tagged or not, but there are a bunch of people whining about it and if 1.c.ii is for real this time it would probably be nice to say now that "this time, it's for real!" instead of after the voting... knowhatimean?pHz wrote:hmmmnnn ...
... the cant-be-arsed-to-tag thing is REALLY starting to bug me though ...
slainte
Ah wha evah. Forget I said anything hm'kay?
-
- KVRAF
- 2093 posts since 19 Jun, 2003 from UTM 18 317254E 4295335N (WGS84/NAD83)
Tags are your friends!
-
- The Teach
- Topic Starter
- 8273 posts since 23 Jul, 2002 from flatness
in all seriousness ...farlukar wrote:Ah wha evah. Forget I said anything hm'kay?
... it IS irritating (maybe i have a skewed perspective as im organising the contests and untagged entries just give me one more niggly job to do) ...
... what i might do is just list those who submitted untagged entries at the start of the voting thread and you lot can decide what to do ...
(although personally id favour just booting them out)
slainte
rob
-
- KVRAF
- 2093 posts since 19 Jun, 2003 from UTM 18 317254E 4295335N (WGS84/NAD83)
How about a grace period that ends this month. From then on, it's 1-strike you're out!
I mean, it's just tags. I end up rewriting almost all the ones I download anyway...
I mean, it's just tags. I end up rewriting almost all the ones I download anyway...
-
- KVRist
- 157 posts since 2 Aug, 2004 from St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
pHz wrote:in all seriousness ...farlukar wrote:Ah wha evah. Forget I said anything hm'kay?
... it IS irritating (maybe i have a skewed perspective as im organising the contests and untagged entries just give me one more niggly job to do) ...
... what i might do is just list those who submitted untagged entries at the start of the voting thread and you lot can decide what to do ...
(although personally id favour just booting them out)
slainte
Uh, didn't understand the rules guv... never even realized what the hell tagging was in this connection (thought it was just referring to the filename). Permission to upload amended file with tag added?
RichieBee
-
- The Teach
- Topic Starter
- 8273 posts since 23 Jul, 2002 from flatness
yeah - np mate ...
... just let us know here when youve done it yeah ???
slainte
rob
... just let us know here when youve done it yeah ???
slainte
rob-
- KVRist
- 157 posts since 2 Aug, 2004 from St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
Thanks officer. Promise not to re-offend. New version uploaded over the original (ie, same filename).pHz wrote:yeah - np mate ...
... just let us know here when youve done it yeah ???
slainte
RichieBee