Software vs. Analog in 2025 – Has the Balance Shifted?
-
- KVRAF
- 2858 posts since 24 Nov, 2023
I am not putting any words in your mouth just stating the obvious you don't find Analog Filters to be better than digital ones because you use digital filters and again just said you use "all kinds of processes on all kinds of sounds"_leras wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 9:51 amYou're really determined to label peoplr and try and put words in their mouths, eh?IvyBirds wrote: Thu Jul 17, 2025 3:59 pm So what you are saying is that Analog Filters don't matter and digital filters can do things that can't be matched with hardware
I use all kinds of processes on all kinds of sounds.
Digital filters can be easily automated, for some kinds of things that's very helpful.
And I don't think anyone said anything like all digital filters are bad. I think people have just, accurately, stated and shown examples of tonal qualities software doesn't quite do yet.
-
- KVRAF
- 2858 posts since 24 Nov, 2023
Having a personal preference is fine, liking something is fine, never said it's notseafire wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 5:06 amAh I see, having a preference or even a liking equates to elitism and cork sniffing in your mind.IvyBirds wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 4:57 amNope not even close, go back and read what I wrote, I don't care what anyone uses, what I do care about is elitism and cork sniffing of which there is a ton of it in this thread by the purists, along with all kinds of false information about software synth options
Do carry on. Such fun.
But define it as such
-
- KVRAF
- 2858 posts since 24 Nov, 2023
in the end it's all voltages as that's how we listen to the end product, voltages make speakers vibrate and move air which in turn makes our ear drums vibratedellboy wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 12:25 pm I have to admit that I am baffled by the question as to whether digital can ever equal analogue? One is electrical voltage, the other is digital, what do they have in common? It makes much more sense if we compare like to like, as in, does a behringer analog thingy copy the real thing exactly? Both are analog voltage. Is an electric car the same as an ICE car? They both get you from A to B but the means of engine propulsion is completely different. I guess people like to compare.
Every example posted on this thread is also all digital because at some point voltages were turned into 1s and 0s
-
- KVRAF
- 2858 posts since 24 Nov, 2023
Why does analog even want to copy other analog?dellboy wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 11:41 am Why does digital even want to copy analogue?
Does it suffer from an inferiority complex? In the future digital human clones will lie on the psychiatrist couch and complain how unfair life is. Why do carbon based life forms think they are superior?
Why did Sequential remake the Prophet 5? Why did Moog North Carolina clone the Minimoog? Why did Korg make a 2600 or MS20? Why does Behringer clone old Analog Synths?
-
- KVRAF
- 2772 posts since 28 Mar, 2007
An original MiniMoog did not have DACs, it was entirely analogue in its output. My Juno 6 has analogue output.IvyBirds wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 1:30 pmin the end it's all voltages as that's how we listen to the end product, voltages make speakers vibrate and move air which in turn makes our ear drums vibratedellboy wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 12:25 pm I have to admit that I am baffled by the question as to whether digital can ever equal analogue? One is electrical voltage, the other is digital, what do they have in common? It makes much more sense if we compare like to like, as in, does a behringer analog thingy copy the real thing exactly? Both are analog voltage. Is an electric car the same as an ICE car? They both get you from A to B but the means of engine propulsion is completely different. I guess people like to compare.
Every example posted on this thread is also all digital because at some point voltages were turned into 1s and 0s
-
- KVRAF
- 2772 posts since 28 Mar, 2007
Mainly for commercial reasons, people will buy them.IvyBirds wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 1:39 pmWhy does analog even want to copy other analog?dellboy wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 11:41 am Why does digital even want to copy analogue?
Does it suffer from an inferiority complex? In the future digital human clones will lie on the psychiatrist couch and complain how unfair life is. Why do carbon based life forms think they are superior?
Why did Sequential remake the Prophet 5? Why did Moog North Carolina clone the Minimoog? Why did Korg make a 2600 or MS20? Why does Behringer clone old Analog Synths?
- KVRAF
- 20807 posts since 22 Nov, 2000 from Southern California
- KVRAF
- 1746 posts since 3 Nov, 2023
I haven't said otherwise. Do you need a definition for everything people say here? You seem to have a bee in your pretty bonnet about this thread. Go and make sweet music, don't take everything so seriously or personally.IvyBirds wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 1:25 pmHaving a personal preference is fine, liking something is fine, never said it's notseafire wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 5:06 amAh I see, having a preference or even a liking equates to elitism and cork sniffing in your mind.IvyBirds wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 4:57 amNope not even close, go back and read what I wrote, I don't care what anyone uses, what I do care about is elitism and cork sniffing of which there is a ton of it in this thread by the purists, along with all kinds of false information about software synth options
Do carry on. Such fun.
But define it as such
How original
- addled muppet weed
- 111294 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
IvyBirds wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 1:30 pm
Every example posted on this thread is also all digital because at some point voltages were turned into 1s and 0s
-
- KVRist
- 202 posts since 20 May, 2020
Good work everyone, let's see if we can get this to 200 pages now.
-
- KVRAF
- 16758 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
Obviously, this thread needs to survive to just over 300 pages.BazJacuzzi wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 2:28 pm Good work everyone, let's see if we can get this to 200 pages now.
- KVRAF
- 18446 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
It's funny, I talk about the fact that I can often find that software doesn't hold up when doing various types of things at higher notes, but I forgot to mention that those notes are also pretty annoying sounding on analog synths as well.stoopicus wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 9:59 am The first 100 pages! Nicely done _leras. Also well put. I don’t fully agree with your last sentence but it’s completely accurate to say when *trying* to model an analog filter, there will be gaps to an exact representation.
Whether or not those are really meaningful is open for debate though.
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
- KVRAF
- 26967 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
There are a few such analog purists over on Gearspace. I don't recall anyone in this thread saying such a thing though.Papuzzo wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 10:09 am Well, there is a tendency of people to say their analog equipment is better, meaning superior, to all digital hardware and software. There are purist analog snobs out there.
