KVR Audio

Chris-S · Post by **Chris-S** » Wed Nov 02, 2016 4:11 pm

Urs wrote:We have beta

So I have a new toy. Thanks

mholloway · Post by **mholloway** » Wed Nov 02, 2016 4:14 pm

Uhhh. I own -every- U-He product, but haven't received any info about getting Repro as a gift.... was it an e-mail?

Urs · Post by **Urs** » Wed Nov 02, 2016 4:23 pm

mholloway wrote:Uhhh. I own -every- U-He product, but haven't received any info about getting Repro as a gift.... was it an e-mail?

Send e-mail to support at u-he dot com - you might be registered with two different addresses, so our automated script didn't catch you.

martinjuenke · Post by **martinjuenke** » Thu Nov 03, 2016 7:35 am

spunkmuffin wrote:
Urs wrote:The beta has 2 or 3 parameters that we might kick out from the automatable parameter list. So if you use a lot of automation, you might have to reassign the automation tracks between the first public beta and the final version. Otherwise the beta should be perfectly well suited for production.
.....yes.....yes I think I understand that.....only 1 thing.....WHERE IS IT?! I WANT IT NOW! GIMME GIMME BETA!!!

Urs wrote:Also not we haven't added the final set of presets. There's just 30 "serious" ones and 20 in a folder called "1982" which are a bit bland for what Repro-1 can do. Howard Scarr is currently working on a film project, so his presets won't be popped in for another week or two.
Why doesn't that Urs guy come up with some patches? What does he do all day anyways?

Talking rudely while having no clue ...

twolegstoneworks · Post by **twolegstoneworks** » Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:34 am

Why on earth did I sell Filterscape back in 2007..

reusenoise · Post by **reusenoise** » Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:50 am

...I ve got an idea about next OSC...

electro · Post by **electro** » Thu Nov 03, 2016 5:21 pm

Isn't that tweak page fantastic?

fluffy_little_something · Thu Nov 03, 2016 5:35 pm

reusenoise wrote:...I ve got an idea about next OSC...

It would probably be minimalist music as many computers will hardly run more than 3 or 4 instances

EvilDragon · Post by **EvilDragon** » Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:03 pm

I can easily run about 20 Repro-1s over here... It's not really THAT hungry if you have a halfways decent CPU

fluffy_little_something · Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:08 pm

EvilDragon wrote:I can easily run about 20 Repro-1s over here... It's not really THAT hungry if you have a halfways decent CPU

20 instances using those effects, Jaws in particular?

Lejurai · Post by **Lejurai** » Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:08 pm

fluffy_little_something wrote:
reusenoise wrote:...I ve got an idea about next OSC...
It would probably be minimalist music as many computers will hardly run more than 3 or 4 instances

Bounce?

fluffy_little_something · Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:17 pm

I want to hear and manipulate it all live and in real time

With 4 polyphonic instances one could actually make reasonable music, but with 4 monophonic instances...

AnX · Post by **AnX** » Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:26 pm

fluffy_little_something wrote:I want to hear and manipulate it all live and in real time

Buy a decent computer then

AnX · Post by **AnX** » Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:27 pm

fluffy_little_something wrote:
With 4 polyphonic instances one could actually make reasonable music, but with 4 monophonic instances...

Wrong. The cpu hit would be much higher if it was poly.

penguinfromdeep · Post by **penguinfromdeep** » Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:31 pm

So what's the verdict

KVR Audio

Repro-1 (out now)

To your ears, which filter behaves most analogue