KVR Audio

AdmiralQuality · Post by **AdmiralQuality** » Sat Sep 20, 2008 10:19 pm

Kriminal wrote:
AdmiralQuality wrote: (And, do you need a superior product to earn the right to post? If so, what are the rest of you doing posting in here? You're obviously not worthy! )
i would rather use one of mine than yours anyday.

poly anal looks and sounds shite.

That's just your opinion. I feel the same way about your toys.

Kriminal · Post by **Kriminal** » Sat Sep 20, 2008 10:21 pm

AdmiralQuality wrote: That's just your opinion.

indeed, and im happy with it

djsubject · Post by **djsubject** » Sat Sep 20, 2008 10:21 pm

Branis

i really like that!

Subz

Kriminal · Post by **Kriminal** » Sat Sep 20, 2008 10:22 pm

AdmiralQuality wrote: I feel the same way about your toys.

you lowered yourself from your professional position to even try them?

aciddose · Post by **aciddose** » Sat Sep 20, 2008 10:25 pm

krim you're my inspiration to write poopsynth vsti with vintage emulation using o-ring filter technology.

robenestobenz · Post by **robenestobenz** » Sat Sep 20, 2008 10:25 pm

Branis wrote:This is probably a bad timing due to all the bad mouthing going on, but what the heck.

Is there a coder that likes this GUI and would like to implement it?
All controls are on one page (all are included), there's even one extra control for changing the background colour (I hope that's possible).

I love the fundamental style, the teal on grey somehow gives the knobs a fantastic cel-shaded look. I'd like to see the different groups of controls distinguished from each other a bit more distinctly though - at the moment it looks like a load of controls floating in space to me, with only the grey lines slicing them up. It could be my monitor though, it's a bit off-colour these days.

aciddose · Post by **aciddose** » Sat Sep 20, 2008 10:28 pm

"at the moment it looks like a load of controls floating in space to me, with only the grey lines slicing them up. It could be my monitor though, it's a bit off-colour these days."

the gamma of his color selection for the background grey is just too low. he uses a grey background and black regions similar to the regions in gsoto's design. (with smoothed corners)

i'll probably adjust the gamma of his color selections a little bit when we release it. for now here is a gamma-adjusted version of his mockup: http://xhip.cjb.net/temp/public/xhipguimi6gamma.png

AdmiralQuality · Post by **AdmiralQuality** » Sat Sep 20, 2008 10:30 pm

Kriminal wrote:
AdmiralQuality wrote: I feel the same way about your toys.
you lowered yourself from your professional position to even try them?

Part of being a professional means trying everything else out there. (It's AD who's stated here several times that he doesn't use anyone else's products.)

That's how we form opinions. If I hadn't tried them, I wouldn't have an opinon about them. (Though I'd still have one about you!

)

Kriminal · Post by **Kriminal** » Sat Sep 20, 2008 10:38 pm

djsubject wrote:Branis

i really like that!

Subz

looks a bit too much like u-he stuff, not that thats bad, but you need a sep identity for diff companies/products

DuX · Post by **DuX** » Sat Sep 20, 2008 10:49 pm

djsubject wrote:Branis

i really like that!

Subz

Holy shit! Me too! Gimmie!

btw. Circuit VSTi looks preety much like that, too, so what the heck

. It looks good.

Cheers!

koolkeys · Post by **koolkeys** » Sat Sep 20, 2008 10:51 pm

Watching these pre-ban posts by AQ is becoming an amusing past time here at KVR. I mean, does anyone except for AQ himself here actually WANT him in this thread, or think he has ANY reason to be here? When will he realize that he has dug his own grave? I tried his synth, and didn't like it. Tried XHip, didn't like it(yet, but getting better). I could care less about the facts of his post. But it's just ANNOYING to see a thread ruined time and time again by somebody who has a PERSONAL vendetta against a dev who is releasing a FREE synth. Sour grapes, if you ask me.

Can't AQ just let bitterness go and just GO AWAY? It's so distracting and is in EVERY SINGLE WAY the works of a troll. Where in the world did it start being the case where a freeware dev has ANY responsibility towards the users? AD can do as he pleases, and there is nothing wrong with it. But apparently AQ believes in the ridiculous idea that this particular freeware dev somehow owes people something in his "product".

Let's remember that this didn't start with this last spurt of blabberings by AQ. It started with him criticizing AD way back. This isn't the case of him getting involved because of "lies". He got involved and started his idiotic grudge before AD ever addressed him.

Please AQ, go away, at least from this thread.

Brent

koolkeys · Post by **koolkeys** » Sat Sep 20, 2008 10:52 pm

Kriminal wrote:
djsubject wrote:Branis

i really like that!

Subz
looks a bit too much like u-he stuff, not that thats bad, but you need a sep identity for diff companies/products

I don't know, there are several synths that use the same type of "knobs" as U-he stuff.

However, I do REALLY like that GUI.

Brent

vurt · Post by **vurt** » Sat Sep 20, 2008 10:53 pm

if hes getting to brent then he really must be bad

i have a very low tolerance for idiots but brent seems far more easy going.

AdmiralQuality · Post by **AdmiralQuality** » Sat Sep 20, 2008 10:57 pm

koolkeys wrote:Watching these pre-ban posts by AQ is becoming an amusing past time here at KVR. I mean, does anyone except for AQ himself here actually WANT him in this thread, or think he has ANY reason to be here? When will he realize that he has dug his own grave? I tried his synth, and didn't like it. Tried XHip, didn't like it(yet, but getting better). I could care less about the facts of his post. But it's just ANNOYING to see a thread ruined time and time again by somebody who has a PERSONAL vendetta against a dev who is releasing a FREE synth. Sour grapes, if you ask me.

Can't AQ just let bitterness go and just GO AWAY? It's so distracting and is in EVERY SINGLE WAY the works of a troll. Where in the world did it start being the case where a freeware dev has ANY responsibility towards the users? AD can do as he pleases, and there is nothing wrong with it. But apparently AQ believes in the ridiculous idea that this particular freeware dev somehow owes people something in his "product".

Let's remember that this didn't start with this last spurt of blabberings by AQ. It started with him criticizing AD way back. This isn't the case of him getting involved because of "lies". He got involved and started his idiotic grudge before AD ever addressed him.

Please AQ, go away, at least from this thread.

Brent

More lies. It started with AD lying about my products. Way back, yes. (If that's not apparent it's because Meffy changed history.)

I post on topic. Then reply to YOU guys. Sorry if you don't like my replies. Too bad you're not the particular L'il Hitler who's in charge around here or your opinion might matter.

dirty oscillators · Post by **dirty oscillators** » Sat Sep 20, 2008 10:58 pm

vurt wrote:if hes getting to brent then he really must be bad
i have a very low tolerance for idiots but brent seems far more easy going.

it's one thing if someone's adding a little humor to their comments but AQ doesn't, he just sounds like a little baby trying to garner support by dissing other people and constantly trying to prove that he's right. i say someone's got issues and it's wasting server space on here.

XHip--Please finish your synth!!