dismissed.........
Behringer V-Verb Pro - a real Lexicon and TC Killer ?
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1144 posts since 26 Sep, 2005 from Germany
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1144 posts since 26 Sep, 2005 from Germany
and to make things clear....
I did not compare the processed sounds with the Convolution based ones just to say : hey, look it sounds so much better than a Lexicon 480L or TC xxx.
That's what some people interpreted on their own.
I just wanted to give a contrast.
I wanted to show( may I say "prove" because I own a IR-Convolver), that the unit is way better than any software-based reverbs, specially the convolution based... Many many users think that the IR-reverbs / convolution is the most realistic technique for creating reverbs. I always argued the converse.
If some people have problems with reading try again and read the first post of the thread !
If you do not understand, go back to school and if that doesn't help, call the next doctor that is experienced with mental issues... (some people even claim to be students...
)
And while we are talking about reverbs, I do not have to own a 480L to know what good sounding reverb has to sound like....
these are butter and bread effects and you can hear these reverbs on nearly every buyable CD ...
So I just claim that the Behringer deliver top-notch-reverb that is on par with the other units.
If a Lex,Quantec,TC sounds slightly other is not that important....
More important is perfect dry/wet fusing and other aspects considering density and frequency behaviour
The best simulation will sound like real-world reverb. And you won't believe it.
I am familiar to this also...
So why should a unit just simulate another more expensive box?
I will be happy if it comes close to what real reverb sounds like...
And I claim (not prove) that the unit does this perfectly ...
And first plz prove that the Lexicon, Tc, etc. sound realistic...
And plz not proving it by just using recordings from real world reverb....
I did not compare the processed sounds with the Convolution based ones just to say : hey, look it sounds so much better than a Lexicon 480L or TC xxx.
That's what some people interpreted on their own.
I just wanted to give a contrast.
I wanted to show( may I say "prove" because I own a IR-Convolver), that the unit is way better than any software-based reverbs, specially the convolution based... Many many users think that the IR-reverbs / convolution is the most realistic technique for creating reverbs. I always argued the converse.
If some people have problems with reading try again and read the first post of the thread !
If you do not understand, go back to school and if that doesn't help, call the next doctor that is experienced with mental issues... (some people even claim to be students...
And while we are talking about reverbs, I do not have to own a 480L to know what good sounding reverb has to sound like....
these are butter and bread effects and you can hear these reverbs on nearly every buyable CD ...
So I just claim that the Behringer deliver top-notch-reverb that is on par with the other units.
If a Lex,Quantec,TC sounds slightly other is not that important....
More important is perfect dry/wet fusing and other aspects considering density and frequency behaviour
The best simulation will sound like real-world reverb. And you won't believe it.
I am familiar to this also...
So why should a unit just simulate another more expensive box?
I will be happy if it comes close to what real reverb sounds like...
And I claim (not prove) that the unit does this perfectly ...
And first plz prove that the Lexicon, Tc, etc. sound realistic...
And plz not proving it by just using recordings from real world reverb....
Last edited by hifiboom on Wed Jul 05, 2006 3:27 pm, edited 3 times in total.
-
- KVRist
- 145 posts since 19 May, 2005 from London UK
Is this a good time to argue semantics and say that the V-Verb is simply software involving (although not exclusively) convolution processes anywayhifiboom wrote:I wanted to show( may I say "prove" because I own a IR-Convolver), that the unit is way better than any software-based reverbs, specially the convolution based... Many many users think that the IR-reverbs / convolution is the most realistic technique for creating reverbs. I always argued the converse.
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1144 posts since 26 Sep, 2005 from Germany
I am not sure, but we haven't proven yet that it is based on any kind of convolution.... not even partially...
There are many people that claim many things...
Never read anything like that anywhere, also ther is nothing about that in the manual...
There are many people that claim many things...
Never read anything like that anywhere, also ther is nothing about that in the manual...
Last edited by hifiboom on Wed Jul 05, 2006 3:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Banned
- 4026 posts since 27 Jan, 2004
well, does it matter?hifiboom wrote:At I am not sure, but we haven't proven yet that it is based on convolution.... not even partially...
-
you also said eariler that the V-verb smokes anything by TC - so that must mean the M3000 and the Mfive billion and what ever - you just keep going round in circles.
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1144 posts since 26 Sep, 2005 from Germany
nosnooky wrote: well, does it matter?
thats called personal opinion... In Germany it is allowed to have your own opinion and to freely tell anyonesnooky wrote: you also said eariler that the V-verb smokes anything by TC - so that must mean the M3000 and the Mfive billion and what ever - you just keep going round in circles.
or did I say prove .... ?
well, does it matter?
Or can we come back to normal level....
-
- Banned
- 4026 posts since 27 Jan, 2004
in one post you say that you didn't say the V-Verb was the best, and when I point out to you that you did, you go calling it "personal opinion" - pathetic, just admit defeat and walk away with a likkle bit of hounour...the V-verb is a fine unit, that was never the discussion, it's YOUR ATTITUDE that brings me to say these things to you!! get it?!?!hifiboom wrote:nosnooky wrote: well, does it matter?
thats called personal opinion... In Germany it is allowed to have your own opinion and to freely tell anyonesnooky wrote: you also said eariler that the V-verb smokes anything by TC - so that must mean the M3000 and the Mfive billion and what ever - you just keep going round in circles.![]()
or did I say prove .... ?
well, does it matter?
Or can we come back to normal level....
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1144 posts since 26 Sep, 2005 from Germany
-
- Banned
- 4026 posts since 27 Jan, 2004
what do you mean by that?hifiboom wrote:this is no fight at all...no winner, no looser
This is sharing my experiences with an electronic tool and my opinion about it...
take your M300 and try to produce something useful, than you'll get some respect from my side...
I use my m300 as a DIGI interface since I have sufficient reverbs as vst..what do you want me to do?
Should I make a nice sounding reverbed sound so you can hear how nice my reverbs are?
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1144 posts since 26 Sep, 2005 from Germany
that does mean: take active part of that discussion by delivering information,
that is useful for others.
And stop warping what I have said and not and what is proved and not and that I am a dumb ass idot etc ... thats not fine...
We should let this thread get free of that argueing and come back to a normal discussion level about reverb and specially the Behringer....
Would be real nice to have some Lexicon and TC upper class mp3 demos in this thread....
that is useful for others.
And stop warping what I have said and not and what is proved and not and that I am a dumb ass idot etc ... thats not fine...
We should let this thread get free of that argueing and come back to a normal discussion level about reverb and specially the Behringer....
Would be real nice to have some Lexicon and TC upper class mp3 demos in this thread....
-
Jason Brian Merrill Jason Brian Merrill https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=87372
- KVRAF
- 2694 posts since 11 Nov, 2005 from http://maps.google.com/maps?oi=map&q=Massena,+NY --(on the Canadian border)
im just pointing out your nonsense. i didnt say you werent mature, just that your post obviously wasnt. Its like "nyah nyah, look what i did mommy"snooky wrote:who made you the goodhearted messiah of KVR?Jason Brian Merrill wrote:gotta love the person who needs to proclaim for sure he has muted someone... it shows ultimate maturity.snooky wrote:hifiboom wrote:MEMBER MUTED. Click to view...
I can see his nosehairs wiggling about, but can't hear a word...
you're just as a big a fony as the rest of the dickless crew - simply imlying that I'm not "mature" by a forum post is also a very childish thing to do.
Hypocrite!
how am i a "fony" or a "hypocrite" ??
who is the self righteous one here?
I enjoy truth too, and i spoke it. perhaps you just didnt like it.
check my profile for contact info.
msn messenger is my email as well.
msn messenger is my email as well.
-
Jason Brian Merrill Jason Brian Merrill https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=87372
- KVRAF
- 2694 posts since 11 Nov, 2005 from http://maps.google.com/maps?oi=map&q=Massena,+NY --(on the Canadian border)
ahh, your sense of righteous indignation, no doubt.snooky wrote:it's YOUR ATTITUDE that brings me to say these things to you!! get it?!?!
check my profile for contact info.
msn messenger is my email as well.
msn messenger is my email as well.
-
Jason Brian Merrill Jason Brian Merrill https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=87372
- KVRAF
- 2694 posts since 11 Nov, 2005 from http://maps.google.com/maps?oi=map&q=Massena,+NY --(on the Canadian border)
this thread has taught me 2 new things.
hifiboom gets a little too excited about new cheap gear that sounds halfway decent
and snooky is a loser
hifiboom gets a little too excited about new cheap gear that sounds halfway decent
and snooky is a loser
check my profile for contact info.
msn messenger is my email as well.
msn messenger is my email as well.
-
- Banned
- 4026 posts since 27 Jan, 2004
well, since I am better than the rest of you I can say what I wantJason Brian Merrill wrote:ahh, your sense of righteous indignation, no doubt.snooky wrote:it's YOUR ATTITUDE that brings me to say these things to you!! get it?!?!
- KVRAF
- 26932 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
hifiboom wrote:that does mean: take active part of that discussion by delivering information,
that is useful for others.
And stop warping what I have said and not and what is proved and not and that I am a dumb ass idot etc ... thats not fine...
We should let this thread get free of that argueing and come back to a normal discussion level about reverb and specially the Behringer....
Would be real nice to have some Lexicon and TC upper class mp3 demos in this thread....
There is always someone who somehow feels it is their obligation to punish someone else for being human and thus less than perfect in their expression. Discussion boards have much potential to share knowledge, but often end up with mostly personal issues at the forefront.
I would really like to learn from those who have more expertise. For example, some people say, as if it is jut common knowledge that this Behringer cannot come close to a top Lexicon or TC reverb. Why? Please someone post some demo from a top unit and explain why it is superior. Such discussion is educational and enjoyable. Brok Landers started a reverb thread while back and it was very informative.
