Is the UAD plugs really THAT much better?
-
- KVRAF
- 6097 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
Jesus, forget about BF and his FTones it was just an example(btw: their 2003 release doesn't sound any better).
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer
-
- KVRAF
- 6478 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
aaah. we finally enter the audiophile territory where belief systems and voodoo prevail.
I'm willing to bet mr digris absolute LOVED the pet sounds untill he found out it was done on digital.
It's called the placebo effect.
I understand if someone says that something sounds "woody". But as soon as we get into the "sounds oaky" club, I leave the room.
I'm willing to bet mr digris absolute LOVED the pet sounds untill he found out it was done on digital.
It's called the placebo effect.
I understand if someone says that something sounds "woody". But as soon as we get into the "sounds oaky" club, I leave the room.
Last edited by Kingston on Thu Mar 10, 2005 10:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 6097 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
Good choice, but even crazy people can hear.Kingston wrote: from now on I'll just ignore your ramblings and trust your sig.
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer
-
- KVRer
- 17 posts since 15 Sep, 2003 from kentucky
Read the quote. It said a good mastering house uses hardware. Is Mark Linett shite? And the version I'm referring to is the CD stereo version or DVD surround edition in which he remixed using the multitrack backing tracks and the vocals were a pretty darn high quality source. In fact, many people would give their right arm to be able to get that sound.
I never said the UAD was all he used. He used it alot though!
I never said the UAD was all he used. He used it alot though!
There is a bit of an overstatement that it was re-mastered with "just" the UAD-1. Regardless, the original Pet Sounds master tracks would hardly be considered an audiophile source. And, I have the remaster and well, lets just say it sounds like a CD remaster.
-
- KVRAF
- 6097 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
Dude, you can say the music sucks. I have no issue with like/dislike genre. But saying that CD sounds like shit is laughable.nuffink wrote:SJ_Digriz wrote: Not to me. They both sound like shit.
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer
-
- KVRAF
- 6097 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
I'm on a role. I gotta see if I can get this thread longer than my last efforts on the modular host post.StudioTan wrote:This thread kicks ass!
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer
-
Moritz Morpheus MkIII Moritz Morpheus MkIII https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2011
- KVRian
- 668 posts since 11 Mar, 2002 from Vienna, Austria
peace, 
-
- Boss Lovin' DR
- 14312 posts since 15 Mar, 2002 from the grimness of yorkshire
-
Jaeson Merrill Jaeson Merrill https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=29081
- KVRian
- 1185 posts since 10 Jun, 2004 from nowhere you believe in
kingston... I almost dont believe this, but i totally agree with what your saying!!!!Kingston wrote:aaah. we finally enter the audiophile territory where belief systems and voodoo prevail.
I'm willing to bet mr digris absolute LOVED the pet sounds untill he found out it was done on digital.
It's called the placebo effect.
I understand if someone says that something sounds "woody". But as soon as we get into the "sounds oaky" club, I leave the room.
-
- KVRAF
- 6519 posts since 13 Mar, 2002 from UK
Dude. There is no objective standard for taste. Shame really, they could give you a kite mark.SJ_Digriz wrote:Dude, you can say the music sucks. I have no issue with like/dislike genre. But saying that CD sounds like shit is laughable.nuffink wrote: Not to me. They both sound like shit.
-
- KVRAF
- 6478 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
where's the shaking hands emoticon now that we need it.Jaeson Merrill wrote:kingston... I almost dont believe this, but i totally agree with what your saying!!!!
-
- KVRAF
- 6097 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
I can hardly wait to find out what CD you think is a good benchmark to shoot for.nuffink wrote: Dude. There is no objective standard for taste. Shame really, they could give you a kite mark.
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer
-
- KVRAF
- 6097 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
oh, and sorry I don't know what a kite mark is? Clue me in so I can appreciate the finer points of an insult. hehehenuffink wrote:they could give you a kite mark.
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer
-
- KVRAF
- 6519 posts since 13 Mar, 2002 from UK
SJ_Digriz wrote:I can hardly wait to find out what CD you think is a good benchmark to shoot for.nuffink wrote: Dude. There is no objective standard for taste. Shame really, they could give you a kite mark.
It's well bum.