KVR Audio

sdv · Post by **sdv** » Thu Feb 17, 2005 7:50 pm

dbl-post

sdv · Post by **sdv** » Thu Feb 17, 2005 7:51 pm

dang dbl-post

sdv · Post by **sdv** » Thu Feb 17, 2005 7:53 pm

fuego96 wrote:
You could also not listen to that jens crybaby,
No need. It's pretty obvious to me who here knows what a real synth is and who doesn't

Yep, the debate should be on algorithms vs samples pure & simple. No judgement call on either as Iuse both types of instruments, but there is a difference.

envoy · Post by **envoy** » Thu Feb 17, 2005 7:55 pm

tony tony chopper wrote:"...I'm not a business person, I'm the programmer..."

I wonder if the business people are aware of this, if for no other reason than the attitude you show has lost them at least one potential sale.

I'm done here.

envoy

shamann · Post by **shamann** » Thu Feb 17, 2005 8:02 pm

sdv wrote:Yep, the debate should be on algorithms vs samples pure & simple. No judgement call on either as Iuse both types of instruments, but there is a difference.

But the point all along was that Rhino had both samples and synthesized oscillators, where as Sytrus had only synthesized oscillators. Besides, algorithm just means a method of performing a task, so sampling is based on algorithms as well.

The debate, if there even is one, is what are the differences between the two synths, whether it be function or sound characteristics, and do the differences warrant a user to get both or stay with just one.

Jaeson Merrill · Post by **Jaeson Merrill** » Thu Feb 17, 2005 9:48 pm

envoy wrote:
Jaeson Merrill wrote:wow, a bit sensitive here.
someone needs some valium.. we're talking about 1s and 0s right?
Yes, he already apologized, and noted that he mis-read the comments...

yes, i saw that, read it.

Forever Sun · Post by **Forever Sun** » Thu Feb 17, 2005 10:21 pm

sdv wrote:
fuego96 wrote:
You could also not listen to that jens crybaby,
No need. It's pretty obvious to me who here knows what a real synth is and who doesn't
Yep, the debate should be on algorithms vs samples pure & simple. No judgement call on either as Iuse both types of instruments, but there is a difference.

And both Cytrus and Rhino have algorithms (being FM synths), hence there's not much sense in your reasoning. Or are you going to prove that Rhino hasn't got any algorithms ? Hmm ?

tony tony chopper · Post by **tony tony chopper** » Thu Feb 17, 2005 10:29 pm

And both Cytrus and Rhino have algorithms

So it does make sense to compare both or their algorithms (which I tried to do building a feature list).

elv · Post by **elv** » Thu Feb 17, 2005 10:39 pm

wow 14 pages and counting......
If I would have knew that this would get so way,way ,way out of hand I would never have asked this question.
But the good new is I found a FM synth I liked more than the other, and bought it. But I think I will just keep it to meself what synth that was.

kodama · Post by **kodama** » Thu Feb 17, 2005 10:41 pm

Operator?

tony tony chopper · Post by **tony tony chopper** » Thu Feb 17, 2005 10:44 pm

I think I will just keep it to meself what synth that was

Probably toxic FM which isn't bad at all.

Operator? That gotta be a joke.

Forever Sun · Post by **Forever Sun** » Thu Feb 17, 2005 10:48 pm

fuego96 wrote:

Never said it was a contra point. It's a great point (read "additional feature"). Which makes the comparison between the two a bit strange. They're clearly different in specs and in sound anyway.

Why would you consider comparing these two as strange ? The idea of comparising is exactly this:
Take two ( or more) products or things and asses their similarities and differences. That's the idea.

Hence , I'm able to compare an apple with a Brazilian samba dancer. Do they share any similarities? Are they edible ? Do they taste the same ? Are they really similar ? Which one would be suitable for a steamy dance routine and which one for breakfast. Etc Etc. We will find out when we compare ( oh , I know ,a childish example, but it works,

)

You can surely compare two completely different things !

However, Cytrus and Rhino ARE NOT completely different. They DO SHARE lot's of similar ideas. So it's not strange at all.

I'm sorry for being anal here, but I'm sick to see comments like - we shouldn't be comparing these - that pop up in threads like this.

Let's compare and learn.

elv · Post by **elv** » Thu Feb 17, 2005 10:50 pm

tony tony chopper wrote:
I think I will just keep it to meself what synth that was
Probably toxic FM which isn't bad at all.

Gol that was so quick its scary

JMC · Post by **JMC** » Thu Feb 17, 2005 10:51 pm

elv wrote:wow 14 pages and counting ...

It's the cheapest way to keep Sytrus on the frontpage of KVR

See ya,

jmc (FL Studio)

elv · Post by **elv** » Thu Feb 17, 2005 10:54 pm

jeanmariecannie wrote:
elv wrote:wow 14 pages and counting ...
It's the cheapest way to keep Sytrus on the frontpage of KVR

See ya,

jmc (FL Studio)

hehe silly me...of course it is.......tell me how many are on the GB now

Sytrus vs Rhino [6 years dead thread bumped; go to page 21]