d16 Group LUSH-2 coming in June 2023

[martiu]

lush 1 better than lush 2 how about that, yeah, deAL WITH IT

[Scoox]

The mod matrix could be better. For example, it would be dope to be able to have the ADSR modulate oscillator hard sync offset, which ATM can't be done.

[Cuauhtli]

I got it when it was on sale for ~$40 iirc just for the vocal/vowel filter. I like it, but yeah, the gui/workflow could use some work and a sophisticated sequencer would be a welcome addition.

[Nug Wrangler]

Do I need this sound wise or feature wise if I already have Dune 3?

Yes. buy now

[Scoox]

I got it when it was on sale for ~$40 iirc just for the vocal/vowel filter. I like it, but yeah, the gui/workflow could use some work and a sophisticated sequencer would be a welcome addition.

I think developers need to ditch the whole "making software look like hardware" paradigm. It was cool back when hardware was still better than software but now things have changed. In trying to make GUIs resemble hardware, we miss out on more efficient workflows. A good example of a company that understands this is FabFilter (among many others), and it's fine.

[martiu]

Do I need this sound wise or feature wise if I already have Dune 3?

install now

[Touch The Universe]

I got it when it was on sale for ~$40 iirc just for the vocal/vowel filter. I like it, but yeah, the gui/workflow could use some work and a sophisticated sequencer would be a welcome addition.

Haha, yeah the vowel filter in lush is pretty dope. Look up lush 101 vowels on YouTube and hopefully one of my videos pops up, I tweak it and create some very interesting vowel sequences.

[Cuauhtli]

Haha, yeah the vowel filter in lush is pretty dope. Look up lush 101 vowels on YouTube and hopefully one of my videos pops up, I tweak it and create some very interesting vowel sequences.

Just checked it out. Pretty cool. I've just used the arpeggiator with it and haven't gotten as in-depth with it yet.

I think developers need to ditch the whole "making software look like hardware" paradigm. It was cool back when hardware was still better than software but now things have changed. In trying to make GUIs resemble hardware, we miss out on more efficient workflows. A good example of a company that understands this is FabFilter (among many others), and it's fine.

True. The CS-80 emulations are probably the worst.

[martiu]

I got it when it was on sale for ~$40 iirc just for the vocal/vowel filter. I like it, but yeah, the gui/workflow could use some work and a sophisticated sequencer would be a welcome addition.

I think developers need to ditch the whole "making software look like hardware" paradigm. It was cool back when hardware was still better than software but now things have changed. In trying to make GUIs resemble hardware, we miss out on more efficient workflows. A good example of a company that understands this is FabFilter (among many others), and it's fine.

agree 100%

[sqigls]

except fapfilters guis are generally convoluted and getting worse
the lush 2 gui is much easier to use

[Touch The Universe]

Haha, yeah the vowel filter in lush is pretty dope. Look up lush 101 vowels on YouTube and hopefully one of my videos pops up, I tweak it and create some very interesting vowel sequences.

Just checked it out. Pretty cool. I've just used the arpeggiator with it and haven't gotten as in-depth with it yet.

I think developers need to ditch the whole "making software look like hardware" paradigm. It was cool back when hardware was still better than software but now things have changed. In trying to make GUIs resemble hardware, we miss out on more efficient workflows. A good example of a company that understands this is FabFilter (among many others), and it's fine.

True. The CS-80 emulations are probably the worst.

I got like 800 presets for lush, might be worth checking out dozens of vowel ones to take apart