Now you're just being a Troll...and revealing your ignorance as well.........move on.......izonin wrote: Exactly. He didn't spend time developing filters - he used generic ones. He didn't work on a smart solution to reduce aliasing without oversampling. Where is the effort here?
indeedTeksonik wrote:Now you're just being a Troll...and revealing your ignorance as well.........move on.......izonin wrote: Exactly. He didn't spend time developing filters - he used generic ones. He didn't work on a smart solution to reduce aliasing without oversampling. Where is the effort here?
And all I'm trying to say is in my opinion he's wrong. I like the filters. So now what? We keep hitting the ball back and forth across the net or the person who doesn't like the game can go find something else to play...........Liero wrote:I think bmanics only point was to point out that the filter doesn't sound good, to which everyone elses response was "a synth is not all about filters". Well, maybe not but he was only trying to tell you that in his opinion the filter doesn't sound good.
That's rather insulting.Teksonik wrote:Why? Are you incapable of forming your own opinion? The only opinion that matters....good or bad....is your own. Even if for some reason you can't demo Diversion, I can't see using other people's opinions to make a decision whether to purchase or not....rj0 wrote:Especially for new products, I *want* to hear what people like and/or dislike about the product, especially the 'sound'.
Jumping to conclusions again. As said above, I 'do' like Diversion. I also like flexible synths.Teksonik wrote:Just as it makes no sense to me to continue participating in a thread about a synth you don't like....ElectraX was mentioned....I think it sounds like two cats fighting but I don't waste my time posting in ElectraX threads about it because the basic sound will not change....rj0 wrote: It makes no sense to exclude all but positive impressions.
So you're assuming everyone either loves or hates Diversion? Nothing in-between? And that filter variations don't matter? Not to mention (whoops, sorry just did) sches response to me regarding that very note?Teksonik wrote:From what I'm reading it's not subtle variations that are at issue here but the basic bones and flesh structure of the sound....if that changes to please those who don't like it then those who do like it will no longer find it appealing....in other words change the character and you'll simply flip the haters to lovers and lovers to haters....now is it technically possible to change Diversion's sound so it pleases everybody? What do you think the odds are of that being possible or practical?rj0 wrote:Besides, it's not like developers in the past haven't on occasion added more sonic flexibility to their synths by adding a couple of filter variations that allowed one to significantly change the character of the sound.
your black and white summation is not even close to what was said by various people. Maybe try not speaking for others and speak for yourself. Otherwise it is an endless he said/she said with everyone interpreting what others are saying.Liero wrote:I think bmanics only point was to point out that the filter doesn't sound good, to which everyone elses response was "a synth is not all about filters". Well, maybe not but he was only trying to tell you that in his opinion the filter doesn't sound good.
pdxindy wrote:your black and white summation is not even close to what was said by various people. Maybe try not speaking for others and speak for yourself. Otherwise it is an endless he said/she said with everyone interpreting what others are saying.Liero wrote:I think bmanics only point was to point out that the filter doesn't sound good, to which everyone elses response was "a synth is not all about filters". Well, maybe not but he was only trying to tell you that in his opinion the filter doesn't sound good.
I really enjoyed that movie... especially the carrotsIgro wrote:pdxindy wrote:your black and white summation is not even close to what was said by various people. Maybe try not speaking for others and speak for yourself. Otherwise it is an endless he said/she said with everyone interpreting what others are saying.Liero wrote:I think bmanics only point was to point out that the filter doesn't sound good, to which everyone elses response was "a synth is not all about filters". Well, maybe not but he was only trying to tell you that in his opinion the filter doesn't sound good.
... 3dB's..? Wow.hakey wrote:Fwiw, I'm with the naysayers - to my ears the LPF sounds rather boxy and lifeless, worse at high resonance. And the raw oscillator, at least the sawtooth (!), somewhat lacking in body and presence. In comparison with Zebra's saw to achieve the same perceived volume Diversion has to push some 3dB's above Zebra.
Oh well...
Nicely laid out GUI and architecture.
Or is that cheating?
No it's brutally honest......there's a difference. Life sucks get a helmet.......rj0 wrote:That's rather insulting.
Jumping to conclusions that I was talking to you.....obviously the reference to ElectraX was not directed at you. Why so defensive?rj0 wrote: Jumping to conclusions again.
Good advice you should take it.......rj0 wrote:Chill.
And therein lies the key word.......comparison.........why compare it to anything? It brings something new in my opinion and I have plans for it to serve proudly side by side with my Zebra 2 someday.........hakey wrote: In comparison with Zebra's.......
Well we are getting close to the point where Meffy's going to step in....when Monkeys start to throw feces the lock can't be far behind.Crackbaby wrote:Is there no troll moderation on this forum?
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026
